Talk:Rhodesian Front: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Zimbabwe|class=start|importance=high|Rhodesia=yes|Rhodesia-importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Africa|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Politics | political-parties=yes| political-parties-importance=high|class=start|importance=}}
{{WikiProject British Empire|class= }}
}}
}}
 
Line 23 ⟶ 22:
 
I would like to know what these 15 principles are. If they can not be put in the article, could we have a link to them? [[Special:Contributions/66.201.56.88|66.201.56.88]] ([[User talk:66.201.56.88|talk]]) 00:30, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 
:The founding principles state explicitly that the Rhodesian Front was a white supremacist party. While this was not contentious at the time, the references to furthering domination of the European race in Rhodesia at the expense of Native races is making some contributors nervous. [[User:MTM-2k|MTM-2k]] ([[User talk:MTM-2k|talk]]) 14:38, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 
== Dissolved ==
Line 59 ⟶ 60:
The RfC above was closed with a clear consensus: {{tq|The consensus is that "White supremacy" should be included in the "Ideology" list of the infobox based on how reliable sources have described the political party.}} This was implemented 16 May. One month later, two editors again edit to remove it, using edit summaries like {{tq|the Rhodesian Front is not a white supremacist party}}. In a last version, they accept including "White interests", which hardly can be described as an ideology.
 
The outcome of the RfC was clear. I have explained [[WP:RS]] and [[WP:CONSENSUS]] to {{u|Neddyfram}} in their talk page and given them the chance to self revert, but they have not been active for more than a week after their last revert. Now it is time to implement the consensus again. --[[User:TU-nor|T*U]] ([[User talk:TU-nor|talk]]) 07:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)\
 
There obviously is no consensus above, per the Weak Oppose and Oppose sections. I propose we replace "White Supremacy" with "White Interests" [[Special:Contributions/2001:56A:FA44:C100:B4A7:9202:3268:8A89|2001:56A:FA44:C100:B4A7:9202:3268:8A89]] ([[User talk:2001:56A:FA44:C100:B4A7:9202:3268:8A89|talk]]) 23:06, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 
The Rhodesian Front was a self proclaimed white supremacist organisation, this view was unambiguously espoused within rank and file of the party and existed in the Rhodesian Front's own Principles and Policies (1962) manifesto. Why is this being contested? [[User:MTM-2k|MTM-2k]] ([[User talk:MTM-2k|talk]]) 22:18, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 
:{{ping|MTM-2k}} Why then it had a lot of Black members? --[[Special:Contributions/95.24.66.180|95.24.66.180]] ([[User talk:95.24.66.180|talk]]) 02:27, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
::hi. Do you have a source where we can read that? [[User:Babakathy|Babakathy]] ([[User talk:Babakathy|talk]]) 05:14, 16 January 2024 (UTC)