Bob Goodlatte: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
This article was categorized under Christian Scientists, but no source or information was given in the body of the article.
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 62:
During a secret meeting on the night before the start of the [[115th United States Congress|115th Congress]], Goodlatte led an attempt by House Republicans to reduce the reach of the independent [[Office of Congressional Ethics]]. The Office was created in 2008 after numerous infractions involving Republican lobbyist [[Jack Abramoff]], resulting in the imprisonment of House member [[Bob Ney]].<ref name="twsNYT4849">{{cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/us/politics/with-no-warning-house-republicans-vote-to-hobble-independent-ethics-office.html?_r=0|title=With No Warning, House Republicans Vote to Gut Independent Ethics Office|date=January 3, 2017|work=The New York Times|quote=...Goodlatte announced on Monday that the House Republican Conference had approved a change to weaken the Office of Congressional Ethics...|author=Eric Lipton|access-date=January 3, 2017}}</ref> The proposed amendment to House Rules, spearheaded by Goodlatte, gave the [[House Ethics Committee]] - made up of partisan elected officials - oversight of what would be the renamed Office and power to stop inquiries that had the potential to lead to criminal charges. It would have also blocked the Office's staff from speaking with reporters and other news media members.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/jan/03/house-gops-ethics-vote-what-was-all-about-anyway/|title=The House GOP's ethics vote: What was that about, anyway?|last=Jacobson|first=Louis|date=2017-01-03|newspaper=PolitiFact|access-date=2017-01-04}}</ref>
 
The amendment passed during the secret meeting, but its fortunes were reversed once news of the measure leaked out. The proposed changes immediately drew strong criticism from prominent figures on both sides of the aisle, including House Minority Leader [[Nancy Pelosi]], President-elect [[Donald Trump]], and even Abramoff himself.<ref name=":0" /><ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/house-ethics-panel-jack-abramoff-233126|title=Jack Abramoff slams GOP over House ethics changes|last=Goldmacher|first=Shane|date=2016-01-03|newspaper=Politico|access-date=2017-01-04}}</ref> Additionally, social media catalyzed a swift reaction from constituents, with [[Google]] reporting that searches for "Who is my representative" surged in the hours following the public unveiling of the mooted changes to the Office.<ref>{{Cite news|url=httphttps://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/312547-google-reports-jump-in-who-is-my-representative-search-after/|title=Google searches for 'who is my representative' spike|last=Calfas|first=Jennifer|date=2017-01-03|newspaper=The Hill|access-date=2017-01-04}}</ref> Representatives received thousands of calls demanding they cease their support for the amendment.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/republicans-house-ethics-backlash-233152|title=Inside the House GOP ethics debacle|last1=Bade|first1=Rachael|date=2017-01-03|last2=Bresnahan|first2=John|newspaper=Politico|last3=Cheney|first3=Kyle|access-date=2017-01-04}}</ref> In less than 24 hours, Goodlatte and his fellow Republicans scrapped the proposal.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/03/us/politics/trump-house-ethics-office.html|title=House Republicans, Under Fire, Back Down on Gutting Ethics Office|last1=Lipton|first1=Eric|date=2017-01-03|last2=Flegenheimer|first2=Matt|newspaper=The New York Times|issn=0362-4331|access-date=2017-01-04}}</ref>
 
====Budget====
One of Goodlatte's legislative initiatives was his constitutional amendment to require a balanced [[United States federal budget|federal budget]]. Goodlatte wrote and put forward both the "clean" [[Balanced Budget Amendment]] which had a higher chance of actually passing the House and the Senate as well as a version that makes it harder to increase taxes by requiring a two-thirds majority vote in both chambers to raise taxes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.atr.org/conservatives-congress-vote-weak-balanced-budget-a6580|title=Conservatives to Congress: Vote NO on a Weak Balanced Budget Amendment|author=Mattie Duppler|date=2011-11-09|access-date=2012-06-03|publisher=Americans for Tax Reform}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=httphttps://thehill.com/blogspolicy/on-the-moneyfinance/budget/192699178221-gopsponsor-favorssays-clean-balanced-budget-amendment-sponsorhas-saysedge-for-floor-vote/ |title=Sponsor says 'clean' balanced budget amendment has edge for floor vote |publisher=TheHill |date=2014-06-23 |access-date=2014-08-08}}</ref> However, Representatives [[Paul Ryan]], [[Justin Amash]], [[David Dreier]] and [[Louie Gohmert]] voted against the "clean" amendment because it could have allowed taxes to be raised on Americans. Ryan released a statement after the vote, saying: "I'm concerned that this version will lead to a much bigger government fueled by more taxes. Spending is the problem, yet this version of the Balanced Budget Amendment makes it more likely taxes will be raised, government will grow, and economic freedom will be diminished. Without a limit on government spending, I cannot support this Amendment."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/why-ryan-voted-against-balanced-budget-amendment|title=Washington Examiner|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111120045534/http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/why-ryan-voted-against-balanced-budget-amendment#|archive-date=2011-11-20|url-status=dead}}</ref>
 
====National security====
Line 97:
 
* Congressional Internet Caucus (Co-Chair)
* Congressional Civil Justice Caucus (Co-Chair)<ref>{{cite web |url=http://goodlatte.house.gov/pages/civil-justice-caucus |title=Bob Goodlatte – Virginia 6th District :: Civil Justice Caucus |publisher=Goodlatte.house.gov |access-date=2014-08-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140918195217/http://goodlatte.house.gov/pages/civil-justice-caucus# |archive-date=2014-09-18 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* Congressional Pro Life Caucus<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite web |url=http://goodlatte.house.gov/pages/family-values |title=Bob Goodlatte – Virginia 6th District :: Family Values |publisher=Goodlatte.house.gov |access-date=2014-08-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140730154245/http://goodlatte.house.gov/pages/family-values# |archive-date=2014-07-30 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* Congressional Prayer Caucus<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
* Congressional Caucus on Adoption
Line 109:
* Iraq Fallen Heroes Caucus
* Shipbuilding Caucus
* Air Force Caucus<ref>{{cite web |url=http://goodlatte.house.gov/pages/national-defense |title=Bob Goodlatte – Virginia 6th District :: Military/National Defense |publisher=Goodlatte.house.gov |access-date=2014-08-08 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140805113608/http://goodlatte.house.gov/pages/national-defense# |archive-date=2014-08-05 |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* Congressional Cement Caucus
* [[Republican Study Committee]]<ref>{{cite web|title=Member List|url=https://rsc-walker.house.gov/|publisher=Republican Study Committee|access-date=17 November 2017|archive-date=1 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190101195017/https://rsc-walker.house.gov/|url-status=dead}}</ref>
Line 454:
 
==Personal life==
Goodlatte has been married since 1974; he and his wife have two children.<ref>{{cite web|title=About Goodlatte – Family|url=http://www.goodlatte.house.gov/pages/about-bob|access-date=2014-12-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141205195632/http://goodlatte.house.gov/pages/about-bob#|archive-date=2014-12-05|url-status=dead}}</ref> He is a [[Christian Scientist]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Members of Congress: Religious Affiliations |url=https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2015/01/05/members-of-congress-religious-affiliations/ |website=Pew Research |publisher=Pew Research Center |access-date=22 April 2024 |date=5 January 2015}}</ref>
 
== References ==