Parts-per notation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Add table
m change U+00B5 to U+03BC (μ) per Unicode standard and MOS:NUM#Specific units - see Unicode compatibility characters (via WP:JWB)
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Set of units to describe small values}}
{{Redirect|Parts per billion|the film|Parts per Billion{{!}}''Parts per Billion''}}
[[File:Fluorescein (2).jpg|thumb|upright|[[Fluorescein]] aqueous solutions, diluted from 1 to 10,000 to 1 parts-per-million]] in intervals of 10 fold dilution.
 
 
At 1 ppm the solution is a very pale yellow. As the concentration increases the colour becomes a more vibrant yellow, then orange, with the final 10,000 ppm a deep red colour.]]
 
In [[science]] and [[engineering]], the '''parts-per notation''' is a set of pseudo-units to describe small values of miscellaneous [[dimensionless quantity|dimensionless quantities]], e.g. [[mole fraction]] or [[mass fraction (chemistry)|mass fraction]]. Since these [[fraction (mathematics)|fractions]] are quantity-per-quantity measures, they are pure numbers with no associated [[units of measurement]]. Commonly used are '''parts-per-million''' ('''ppm''', {{nowrap|10<sup>−6</sup>}}), '''parts-per-billion''' ('''ppb''', {{nowrap|10<sup>−9</sup>}}), '''parts-per-trillion''' ('''ppt''', {{nowrap|10<sup>−12</sup>}}) and '''parts-per-quadrillion''' ('''ppq''', {{nowrap|10<sup>−15</sup>}}). This notation is not part of the [[International System of Units]] (SI) system and its meaning is ambiguous.
 
==Overview Applications ==
Parts-per notation is often used describing dilute solutions in [[chemistry]], for instance, the relative abundance of dissolved minerals or pollutants in [[water]]. The quantity "1 ppm" can be used for a mass fraction if a water-borne pollutant is present at one-millionth of a [[gram]] per gram of sample solution. When working with [[aqueous solutionssolution]]s, it is common to assume that the density of water is 1.00  g/mL. Therefore, it is common to equate 1  kilogram of water with 1 L of water. Consequently, 1  ppm corresponds to 1 mg/L and 1 ppb corresponds to 1 μg/L.
 
Similarly, parts-per notation is used also in [[physics]] and [[engineering]] to express the value of various proportional phenomena. For instance, a special metal alloy might expand 1.2&nbsp;[[micrometre|micrometers]] per [[metre|meter]] of length for every [[Celsius|degree Celsius]] and this would be expressed as {{nobr|"''[[coefficient of thermal expansion|{{mvar}}]]''&nbsp; {{=&nbsp;}} 1.2&nbsp; ppm/°C".}} Parts-per notation is also employed to denote the change, stability, or [[standard deviation|uncertainty]] in measurements. For instance, the accuracy of land-survey distance measurements when using a [[laser rangefinder]] might be 1&nbsp;millimeter per kilometer of distance; this could be expressed as "[[Accuracy and precision|Accuracy]]&nbsp;=&nbsp;1&nbsp;ppm."<ref>{{efn|
This is a simplified explanation. Laser rangefinders typically have a measurement [["granularity]]" of one to ten millimeters; thus, the complete specification for distance measurement accuracy might read as follows:&nbsp; "Accuracy: {{nobr|±(1&nbsp; mm&nbsp; +&nbsp; 1&nbsp; ppm)".}} Consequently, a distance measurement of only a few meters would still have an accuracy of ±1&nbsp;mm in this example.</ref>
|}}
 
Parts-per notations are all dimensionless quantities: in mathematical expressions, the units of measurement always cancel. In fractions like "2&nbsp;nanometers per meter" {{nobr|(2&nbsp; n <s>m</s> / <s>m</s>&nbsp; {{=}} 2&nbsp; nano&nbsp; {{=}} 2&nbsp;×&nbsp;2×{{10<sup>^|−9</sup>&nbsp;}} {{=}} 2&nbsp; ppb&nbsp; {{=}} 2&nbsp; ×&nbsp; {{val|0.000,000,001}}),}} so the [[quotient]]s are pure-number [[coefficient]]s with positive values less than or equal to&nbsp;1. When parts-per notations, including the [[percent]] symbol (%), are used in regular prose (as opposed to mathematical expressions), they are still pure-number dimensionless quantities. However, they generally take the literal "parts per" meaning of a comparative ratio (e.g. "2&nbsp;ppb" would generally be interpreted as "two parts in a billion parts").<ref name="BIPM">{{cite web |title=Stating values of dimensionless quantities, or quantities of dimension one |at=§&nbsp;5.3.7 |website=BIPM: [|url=http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section5-3-7.html 5.3.7 ''Stating values of dimensionless quantities, or quantities of dimension one]''].}}</ref>
 
Parts-per notations may be expressed in terms of any unit of the same measure. For instance, the [[coefficient of thermal expansion|expansion coefficient]] of a certainsome [[brass]] alloy, ''{{nobr|[[coefficient of thermal expansion|{{mvar|α''&nbsp;}}]] {{=&nbsp;}} 18.7&nbsp; ppm/°C,}} may be expressed as 18.7&nbsp;([[micrometre|µmμm]]/[[meter|m]])/°C, or as 18.7&nbsp;(µμ [[inch|in]]/[[inch|in]])/°C; the numeric value representing a relative proportion does not change with the adoption of a different unit of length.<ref>{{efn|
In the particular case of coefficient of thermal expansion, the change to inches (one of the [[United States customary units|U.S. customary units]]) is typically also accompanied by a change to [[Fahrenheit|degrees Fahrenheit]]. Since a Fahrenheit-sized interval of temperature is only 5/{{sfrac| 5 |9}} that of a Celsius-sized interval, the value is typically expressed as {{nobr|10.4&nbsp; (µμ [[inch|in]]/[[inch|in]])/°F}} rather than {{nobr|18.7&nbsp; (µμ [[inch|in]]/[[inch|in]])/°C.</ref> }}
}}
Similarly, a [[metering pump]] that injects a trace chemical into the main process line at the proportional flow rate ''{{nobr|[[volumetric flow rate|{{mvar|Q}}]]<{{sub>|p</sub>''&nbsp;}} {{=&nbsp;125&nbsp;}} 12 ppm,}} is doing so at a rate that may be expressed in a variety of volumetric units, including {{nobr|125&nbsp;µ μ[[litre|L]]/[[litre|L]],}} {{nobr|125&nbsp;µ μ [[Gallon|gal]] / [[Gallon|gal]],}} 125&nbsp;cm<sup>3</sup>/[[cubic metre|m<sup>3</sup>]], etc.
 
In [[nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy]] (NMR), [[chemical shift]] is usually expressed in ppm. It represents the difference of a measured frequency in parts per million from the reference frequency. The reference frequency depends on the instrument's magnetic field and the element being measured. It is usually expressed in [[MHz]]. Typical chemical shifts are rarely more than a few hundred Hz from the reference frequency, so chemical shifts are conveniently expressed in ppm ([[Hertz (unit)|Hz]]/MHz). Parts-per notation gives a dimensionless quantity that does not depend on the instrument's field strength.
===In nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy===
In [[nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy]] (NMR), [[chemical shift]] is usually expressed in ppm. It represents the difference of a measured frequency in parts per million from the reference frequency. The reference frequency depends on the instrument's magnetic field and the element being measured. It is usually expressed in [[MHz]]. Typical chemical shifts are rarely more than a few hundred Hz from the reference frequency, so chemical shifts are conveniently expressed in ppm (Hz/MHz). Parts-per notation gives a dimensionless quantity that does not depend on the instrument's field strength.
 
==Parts-per expressions==<!-- This specific section is linked from [[Uranium]] and other articles; please do not rename this section. In the following equivalencies, it is assumed that one xxxx of water has a volume of 0.05 ml (20 xxxx per milliliter).-->
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:85%;line-height:0.9;text-align:center;margin-left:1ex;float:right;"
!style="padding:0 1px;"|1 of &rarr;<br />= &#11112;<br />of &darr; &nbsp;
!per<br />cent<br />(%)
!per<br />1&thinsp;000mille<br />(‰)
!per<br />10&thinsp;,000<br />(‱)
!per<br />100&thinsp;,000<br />(pcm)
!per<br />million<br />(ppm)
!per<br />billion<br />(ppb)
|-
!%
|1||0.1||0.01||0.001||0.0001||{{10^|-7}}
|-
!‰
|10||1||0.1||0.01||0.001||{{10^|-6}}
|-
!‱
|100||10||1||0.1||0.01||{{10^|-5}}
|-
!pcm
|1,000||100||10||1||0.1||0.0001
|-
!ppm
|10,000||1,000||100||10||1||0.001
|-
| 2 !ppb
|{{10^|7}}||{{10^|6}}||{{10^|5}}||10,000||1,000||1
|}
{{visualisation_parts_per.svg}}
*''One part per [[100 (number)|hundred]]'' is generally represented by the [[percent sign]] (%) and denotes [[percentage|one part [[percentage|per 100 ({{10^|2}}) parts]], one part in 10<sup>2</sup>, and a value of 1&nbsp;×&nbsp;{{10<sup>−2</sup>^|-2}}. This is equivalent to about fifteenfourteen minutes out of one day.
{{anchor|Thousand}}
*''One part per [[1000 (number)|thousand]]'' should generally be spelled out in full and '''not''' as "ppt" (which is usually understood to represent "parts per [[trillion (short scale)|trillion]]"). It may also be denoted by the [[per mille|permille]] sign (‰). Note however, that specific disciplines such as oceanography, as well as educational exercises, do use the "ppt" abbreviation. "One part per thousand" denotes one part per 1000 parts1,000 one part in ({{10<sup>^|3</sup>}}) parts, and a value of 1&nbsp;×&nbsp;{{10<sup>−3</sup>^|-3}}. This is equivalent to about one and a halfninety minutesseconds out of one day.
*''One part per [[ten thousand]]'' is denoted by the [[permyriad]] sign (‱). Although rarely used in science (ppm is typically used instead), one permyriad has an unambiguous value of one part per 10,000 ({{val10^|100004}}) parts, one part in 10<sup>4</sup>, and a value of 1&nbsp;×&nbsp;{{10<sup>−4</sup>^|-4}}. This is equivalent to about nine seconds out of one day. <br/>In contrast, in [[finance]], the [[basis point]] is typically used to denote changes in or differences between percentage interest rates (although it can also be used in other cases where it is desirable to express quantities in hundredths of a percent). For instance, a change in an interest rate from 5.15% per annum to 5.35% per annum could be denoted as a change of 20 basis points (per annum).<!--NOTE TO EDITORS:
 
Unlike the % symbol, which constitutes a formatting exception to the rule of the SI, a space goes between the value and both the permille and permyriad symbols (‰ and {{unicode|‱}}). Besides adhering to the rule of the SI, this is also good technical writing practice as it helps to distinguish these two less-common symbols from the percent symbol.
 
--> As with interest rates, the words "per annum" (or "per year") are often omitted. In that case, the basis point is a quantity with a dimension of (time<sup>−1</sup>).<ref>{{citeCite web |url=https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/financefixed-income/basis-points-bps-definition/|title=What are Basis Points (BPS)?|website=Corporate Finance Institute}}</ref>
* ''One part per [[100,000|hundred thousand]]'', ''[[per cent mille]]'' ('''pcm''') or ''milli-percent'' denotes one part per {{val|100000}} parts100, one part in 10<sup>5</sup>, {{sfrac|{{val|100000}}}} × 100% = 0.001%000 (or 1% = {{val10^|10005}} pcm) parts, and a value of 1&nbsp;×&nbsp;{{10<sup>−5</sup>^|-5}}. It is commonly used in [[epidemiology]] for mortality, crime and disease prevalence rates, and nuclear reactor engineering as a unit of reactivity. In [[time measurement]] it is equivalent to about 5 minutes out of a year; in [[distance measurement]], it is equivalent to 1&nbsp;cm of error per km of distance traversed.
{{anchor|ppm}}
* ''One part per [[1,000,000|million]]'' ('''ppm''') denotes one part per {{val|1000000}} parts1, one part in 10<sup>6</sup>000, {{sfrac|{{val|1000000}}}} × 100% = 0.0001%000 (or 1% = {{val10^|100006}} ppm) parts, and a value of 1&nbsp;×&nbsp;{{10<sup>−6</sup>^|-6}}. It is equivalent to about 32 seconds out of a year or 1&nbsp;mm of error per km of distance traversed. In [[mining]], it is also equivalent to one [[gram]] per [[metric ton]], expressed as g/t.
{{anchor|ppb}}
* ''One part per [[1000000000 (number)1,000,000,000|billion]]'' ('''ppb''') denotes one part per {{val|1000000000}} parts1, one part in 10<sup>9</sup>000, {{sfrac|{{val|1000000000}}}} × 100% = {{val|0.0000001}}%000,000 (or 1% = {{val10^|100000009}} ppb) parts, and a value of 1&nbsp;×&nbsp;{{10<sup>−9</sup>^|-9}}. This is equivalent to about three seconds out of a [[century]].
{{anchor|ppt}}
* ''One part per [[Orders of magnitude (numbers)#1012|trillion]]'' ('''ppt''') denotes one part per 1,000,000,000,000 ({{val10^|100000000000012}}) parts, one part in 10<sup>12</sup>, and a value of 1&nbsp;×&nbsp;{{10<sup>−12</sup>^|-12}}. This is equivalent to about thirty seconds out of every million years.
{{anchor|ppq}}
* ''One part per [[Orders of magnitude (numbers)#1015|quadrillion]]'' ('''ppq''') denotes one part per 1,000,000,000,000,000 ({{val10^|100000000000000015}}) parts, one part in 10<sup>15</sup>, and a value of 1&nbsp;×&nbsp;{{10<sup>−15</sup>^|-15}}. This is equivalent to about two and a half minutes out of the [[age of the Earth]] (4.5 billion years). Although relatively uncommon in analytical chemistry, measurements at the ppq level are sometimes performed.<ref>
Measurements of [[Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins|dioxin]] are routinely made at the ''sub''-ppq level. The [[United States Environmental Protection Agency|U.S. Environmental Protection Agency]] (EPA) currently sets a hard limit of 30&nbsp;ppq for dioxin in drinking water but once recommended a voluntary limit of 0.013&nbsp;ppq. Also, radioactive contaminants in drinking water, which are quantified by measuring their radiation, are often reported in terms of ppq; 0.013&nbsp;ppq is equivalent to the thickness of a sheet of paper versus a journey of {{val|146000}} trips around the world.<sub>&nbsp;</sub></ref> <!-- EDITORS NOTE REGARDING {{val|146000}} TRIPS AROUND THE WORLD:
 
The analogy of paper thickness vs. 146k trips around the world may be so wildly counterintuitive that the statement might seemingly be in error, but please do not change the statement without first understanding the below math (shown here with excess precision):
 
Paper thickness = 0.0030 inch = 0.0000762 m (0.003 × 25.4 mm/inch ÷ 10001,000 mm/m)
Earth's mean circumference = 40,041,470 m
 
Line 74 ⟶ 86:
 
== Criticism ==
Although the [[International Bureau of Weights and Measures]] (an international standards organization known also by its [[France|French]]-language initials BIPM) recognizes the use of parts-per notation, it is not formally part of the [[International System of Units]] (SI).<ref name="BIPM" /> Note that although "[[Percentage|percent]]" (%) is not formally part of the SI, both the BIPM and the [[International Organization for Standardization]] (ISO) take the position that ''"in mathematical expressions, the internationally recognized symbol % (percent) may be used with the SI to represent the number 0.01"'' for dimensionless quantities.<ref name="BIPM" /><ref>''Quantities and units''. Part 0: ''General principles'', ISO 31-0:1992.</ref> According to [[International Union of Pure and Applied Physics|IUPAP]], ''"a continued source of annoyance to unit purists has been the continued use of percent, ppm, ppb, and ppt"''.<ref name="IUPAP">{{cite web |title=Report on Recent Committee Activities on Behalf of IUPAP to the 1999 IUPAP General Assembly |first=Brian W. |last=Petley |date=September 1998 |url=http://archive.iupap.org/commissions/interunion/iu14/ga-99.html |access-date=2017-08-15 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815113700/http://archive.iupap.org/commissions/interunion/iu14/ga-99.html |archive-date=2017-08-15}}</ref> Although [[#SI-compliant expressions|SI-compliant expressions]] should be used as an alternative, the parts-per notation remains nevertheless widely used in technical disciplines. The main problems with the parts-per notation are set out below.
 
=== Long and short scales ===
{{main|Long and short scales}}
Because the [[names of large numbers|named numbers]] starting with a "[[Long and short scales|billion]]" have different values in different countries, the BIPM suggests avoiding the use of "ppb" and "ppt" to prevent misunderstanding. The U.S. [[National Institute of Standards and Technology]] (NIST) takes the stringent position, stating that ''"the language-dependent terms [...] are not acceptable for use with the SI to express the values of quantities"''.<ref>NIST: ''[http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec07.html#7.10.3 Rules and Style Conventions for Expressing Values of Quantities: 7.10.3 ppm, ppb, and ppt]''.</ref>
 
=== Thousand vs. trillion ===
Line 84 ⟶ 96:
 
=== Mass fraction vs. mole fraction vs. volume fraction ===
Another problem of the parts-per notation is that it may refer to [[Mass fraction (chemistry)|mass fraction]], [[mole fraction]] or [[volume fraction]]. Since it is usually not stated which quantity is used, it is better to write the units out, such as kg/kg, mol/mol or m<sup>3</sup>/m<sup>3</sup>, even though they are all dimensionless.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Schwartz |first1=S.E. |last2=Warneck |first2=P. |title=Units for use in atmospheric chemistry (IUPAC Recommendations 1995) |journal=Pure and Applied Chemistry |date=1995 |volume=67 |issue=8–9 |pages=1377–1406 |doi=10.1351/pac199567081377|url=http://www.iupac.org/publications/pac/1995/pdf/6708x1377.pdf| s2cid = 7029702}}</ref> The difference is quite significant when dealing with gases, and it is very important to specify which quantity is being used. For example, the conversion factor between a mass fraction of 1&nbsp;ppb and a mole fraction of 1&nbsp;ppb is about 4.7 for the greenhouse gas [[CFC-11]] in air. For volume fraction, the suffix "V" or "v" is sometimes appended to the parts-per notation (e.g. ppmV, ppbv, pptv).<ref>{{cite web |title=EPA Onon-line Toolstools for Sitesite Assessmentassessment Calculationcalculation: Indoor Airair Unitunit Conversion |publisher=[[Environmental Protection Agency]] |url=http://www.epa.gov/athens/learn2model/part-two/onsite/ia_unit_conversion.html |publisher=[[Environmental Protection Agency]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Beychok, Milton R. Beychok|year=2005 |article=Air dispersion modeling conversions and formulas |title=Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion |urledition=https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofst0000beyc |article=Air Dispersion Modeling Conversions and Formulas4th |publisher=Milton R. Beychok |edition=4th |isbn=0964458802 |yearurl=2005https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofst0000beyc |url-access=registration}}</ref> UnfortunatelyHowever, ppbv and pptv are also often used for mole fractions (which is identical to volume fraction only for ideal gases).
Another problem of the parts-per notation is that it may refer to [[Mass fraction (chemistry)|mass fraction]], [[mole fraction]] or [[volume fraction]]. Since it is usually not stated which quantity is used, it is better to write the unit as kg/kg, mol/mol or m<sup>3</sup>/m<sup>3</sup> (even though they are all dimensionless).<ref>
{{Cite journal
| last = [http://www.ecd.bnl.gov/steve/schwartz.html Schwartz] and Warneck
| title = Units for use in atmospheric chemistry
| journal = Pure Appl. Chem.
| volume = 67
| issue =
| pages = 1377–1406
| year = 1995
| url = http://www.iupac.org/publications/pac/1995/pdf/6708x1377.pdf
| doi = 10.1351/pac199567081377
| accessdate = March 9, 2011}}
</ref> The difference is quite significant when dealing with gases, and it is very important to specify which quantity is being used. For example, the conversion factor between a mass fraction of 1&nbsp;ppb and a mole fraction of 1&nbsp;ppb is about 4.7 for the greenhouse gas [[CFC-11]] in air. For volume fraction, the suffix "V" or "v" is sometimes appended to the parts-per notation (e.g. ppmV, ppbv, pptv).<ref>{{cite web |title=EPA On-line Tools for Site Assessment Calculation: Indoor Air Unit Conversion |url=http://www.epa.gov/athens/learn2model/part-two/onsite/ia_unit_conversion.html |publisher=[[Environmental Protection Agency]]}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author=Milton R. Beychok|title=Fundamentals of Stack Gas Dispersion |url=https://archive.org/details/fundamentalsofst0000beyc |article=Air Dispersion Modeling Conversions and Formulas |publisher=Milton R. Beychok |edition=4th |isbn=0964458802 |year=2005 |url-access=registration}}</ref> Unfortunately, ppbv and pptv are also often used for mole fractions (which is identical to volume fraction only for ideal gases).
 
To distinguish the mass fraction from volume fraction or mole fraction, the letter "w" (standing for "weight") is sometimes added to the abbreviation (e.g. ppmw, ppbw).<ref>{{cite web |title=Units |series=Introduction to Greengreen Engineeringengineering |date=2012-08-23 |df=dmy-all |publisher=[[University of Virginia]] |url=https://pages.shanti.virginia.edu/CE_2050_F12/2012/08/23/units/}}</ref>
 
The usage of the parts-per notation is generally quite fixed insidewithin mosteach specific branchesbranch of science, but often in a way that is inconsistent with its usage in other branches, leading some researchers to draw the conclusionassume that their own usage (mass/mass, mol/mol, volume/volume, mass/volume, or others) is thecorrect onlyand correctthat oneother usages are incorrect. This, inassumption turn,sometimes leads them to not specify the details of their own usage in their publications, and others may therefore misinterpret their results. For example, [[electrochemistry|electrochemists]] often use volume/volume, while [[Chemical engineering|chemical engineers]] may use mass/mass as well as volume/volume, while [[chemist]]s, the field of [[occupational safety]] and the field of [[permissible exposure limit]] (e.g. permitted [[gas]] exposure limit in [[air]]) may use mass/volume. Unfortunatelly, Manymany academic publications of otherwise excellent level fail to specify their usageuse of the parts-per notation, which irritates some readers, especially those who are not experts in the particular fields in those publications, because parts-per-notation, without specifying what it stands for, can mean anything.{{Citation needed|date=October 2021}}
 
== SI-compliant expressions ==
SI-compliant units that can be used as alternatives are shown in the chart below. Expressions that the BIPM explicitly does not recognize as being suitable for denoting dimensionless quantities with the SI are shownmarked inwith <span style="color:darkred;">red text'''!'''</span>.
 
{|class="wikitable" style="font-size: 95%;"
Line 117:
|align="center"|2 [[Centimetre|cm]]/[[metre|m]]
|align="center"|2 parts per hundred
|align="center"|&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2%<ref>Compliance with the SI regarding the percent symbol (%) is limited in this chart. According to the BIPM’s [http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section5-3-37.html BIPM's SI brochure: Subsection 5.3.3, ''Formatting the value of a quantity''], a space is always used to separate the unit symbol from the numeric value. Notable exceptions are the unit symbols for degree, minute, and second for plane angle, °, ′, and ″ (e.g. a latitude of {{nowrap|47°&thinsp;38′&thinsp;8.8″).}} However, according to [http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/section5-3-7.htmlsection 5.3.7 ''Stating values of dimensionless quantities, or quantities of dimension one]'', the exception does not apply to the "%" symbol; it states as follows: ''"When it [the percent symbol] is used, a space separates the number and the symbol %."'' This practice has not been well adopted with regard to the % symbol, is [[WP:%|contrary to Wikipedia’sWikipedia's ''Manual of Style'']], and is not observed here.<sub>&nbsp;</sub></ref>
|align="center"|2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−2</sup>
|-
Line 123:
|align="center"|2 [[Milli-|m]]V/V
|align="center"|2 parts per thousand
|align="center"|2 ‰ <span style="color:darkred;">2 ‰'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−3</sup>
|-
Line 129:
|align="center"|0.2 mV/V
|align="center"|2 parts per ten thousand
|align="center"|2 ‱ <span style="color:darkred;">2 ‱'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−4</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A sensitivity of...
|align="center"|2 [[Micro-|µμ]]V/V
|align="center"|2 parts per million
|align="center"|2 ppm
Line 140:
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A sensitivity of...
|align="center"|2 [[Nano-|n]]V/V
|align="center"|2 parts per billion <span style="color:darkred;">2 parts per billion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2 ppb <span style="color:darkred;">2 ppb'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A sensitivity of...
|align="center"|2 [[Pico-|p]]V/V
|align="center"|2 parts per trillion <span style="color:darkred;">2 parts per trillion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2 ppt <span style="color:darkred;">2 ppt'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−12</sup>
|-
Line 157:
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A mass fraction of...
|align="center"|2&nbsp;µgμg/kg<!--NOTE TO EDITORS: SI convention is to use the base unit kilogram in formulas and equalities. However, whenever an SI prefix, like milli (m) or micro (m or µμ), is used with the unit of mass, the unit gram (symbol g) is used. This results in a mix of units, such as mg (a thousandth of a gram) over a kilogram (a thousand grams). Thus, one microgram divided by one kilogram is one ppb.-->
|align="center"|2 parts per billion <span style="color:darkred;">2 parts per billion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2 ppb <span style="color:darkred;">2 ppb'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A mass fraction of...
|align="center"|2 ng/kg
|align="center"|2 parts per trillion <span style="color:darkred;">2 parts per trillion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2 ppt <span style="color:darkred;">2 ppt'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−12</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A mass fraction of...
|align="center"|2 pg/kg
|align="center"|2 parts per quadrillion <span style="color:darkred;">2 parts per quadrillion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2 ppq <span style="color:darkred;">2 ppq'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−15</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A volume fraction of...
|align="center"|5.2 µLμL/L
|align="center"|5.2 parts per million
|align="center"|5.2 ppm
Line 181:
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A mole fraction of...
|align="center"|5.24 µmolμmol/mol
|align="center"|5.24 parts per million
|align="center"|5.24 ppm
Line 188:
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A mole fraction of...
|align="center"|5.24 nmol/mol
|align="center"|5.24 parts per billion <span style="color:darkred;">5.24 parts per billion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|5.24 ppb <span style="color:darkred;">5.24 ppb'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|5.24&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A mole fraction of...
|align="center"|5.24 pmol/mol
|align="center"|5.24 parts per trillion <span style="color:darkred;">5.24 parts per trillion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|5.24 ppt <span style="color:darkred;">5.24 ppt'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|5.24&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−12</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A stability of...
|align="center"|1 (µAμA/A)/[[minute|min]]
|align="center"|1 part per million per minute
|align="center"|1 ppm/min
Line 206:
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A change of...
|align="center"|5 nΩ/Ω
|align="center"|5 parts per billion <span style="color:darkred;">5 parts per billion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|5 ppb <span style="color:darkred;">5 ppb'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|5&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| An uncertainty of...
|align="center"|9 µgμg/kg
|align="center"|9 parts per billion <span style="color:darkred;">9 parts per billion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|9 ppb <span style="color:darkred;">9 ppb'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|9&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A shift of...
|align="center"|1 nm/m
|align="center"|1 part per billion <span style="color:darkred;">1 part per billion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|1 ppb <span style="color:darkred;">1 ppb'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|1&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A strain of...
|align="center"|1 µmμm/m
|align="center"|1 part per million
|align="center"|1 ppm
Line 229:
|-
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A [[temperature coefficient]] of...
|align="center"|0.3 (µHzμHz/Hz)/°C
|align="center"|0.3 part per million per °C
|align="center"|0.3 ppm/°C
Line 236:
|style="background:#f2f2f2" align="right"| A frequency change of...
|align="center"|0.35&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup> ƒ
|align="center"|0.35 part per billion <span style="color:darkred;">0.35 part per billion'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|0.35 ppb <span style="color:darkred;">0.35 ppb'''!'''</span>
|align="center"|0.35&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>
|}
 
Note that the notations in the "SI units" column above are allfor the most part [[Dimensionless quantity|dimensionless quantities]]; that is, the units of measurement factor out in expressions like "1&nbsp;nm/m" (1&nbsp;n<s>m</s>/<s>m</s>&nbsp;= 1&nbsp;nano&nbsp;= 1&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>) so the [[quotientratio]]s are pure-number [[coefficient]]s with values less than 1.
 
==Uno (proposed dimensionless unit){{anchor|Uno}}==
==Uno==
Because of the cumbersome nature of expressing certain dimensionless quantities per SI guidelines, the [[International Union of Pure and Applied Physics]] (IUPAP) in 1999 proposed the adoption of the special name "uno" (symbol: U) to represent the number 1 in dimensionless quantities.<ref name="IUPAP" /> ThisIn symbol2004, isa notreport to bethe confused[[International withCommittee thefor always-italicizedWeights symboland forMeasures]] (CIPM) stated that the variableresponse "uncertainty"to (symbol:the ''U'').proposal Thisof unitthe nameuno "unohad been almost entirely negative", and itsthe symbolprincipal couldproponent be"recommended useddropping inthe combinationidea".<ref>{{cite withweb |title=Report of the [[SI16th prefix]]esmeeting (13–14 May 2004) to expressthe International Committee for Weights and Measures, of the valuesInternational Bureau of dimensionlessWeights quantitiesand thatMeasures are|author=Consultative muchCommittee less—orfor evenUnits ''greater''—than|date=13–14 oneMay 2004 |url=http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CCU16.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140310054340/http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CCU16.pdf |archive-date=2014-03-10}}</ref>Certain mathematicalTo functionsdate, canthe produceuno proportionalhas quantitiesnot withbeen valuesadopted greaterby thanany 1[[standards organization]].<sub>&nbsp;</sub></ref>
 
Common parts-per notations in terms of the uno are given in the table below.
 
{| class="wikitable"
|+ IUPAP's "uno" proposal
|-
! Coefficient
! Name
! Parts-per<br>example
! Uno<br>equivalent
! Symbol<br>form
! Value of<br>quantity
|-
| 10<sup>−2</sup>
| Percent
| 2%
| 2 centiuno
| 2 cU
| 2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−2</sup>
|-
| 10<sup>−3</sup>
| Permille
| 2 ‰<!-- NOTE TO EDITORS: Unlike the % symbol, which constitutes a formatting exception to the rule of the SI, a space goes between the value and both the permille and permyriad symbols (‰ and ‱). Besides adhering to the rule of the SI, this is also good technical writing practice as it helps to distinguish these two, less-common symbols from the percent symbol so as to avoid confusion.-->
| 2 milliuno
| 2 mU
| 2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−3</sup>
|-
| 10<sup>−4</sup>
| Per ten thousand
| 2 ‱<!-- NOTE TO EDITORS: Unlike the % symbol, which constitutes a formatting exception to the rule of the SI, a space goes between the value and both the permille and permyriad symbols (‰ and ‱). Besides adhering to the rule of the SI, this is also good technical writing practice as it helps to distinguish these two, less-common symbols from the percent symbol so as to avoid confusion.-->
| 0.2 milliuno
| 0.2 mU
| 2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−4</sup>
|-
| 10<sup>−6</sup>
| Parts per million
| 2 ppm
| 2 microuno
| 2 µU
| 2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−6</sup>
|-
| 10<sup>−9</sup>
| Parts per billion
| 2 ppb
| 2 nanouno
| 2 nU
| 2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>
|-
| 10<sup>−12</sup>
| Parts per trillion
| 2 ppt
| 2 picouno
| 2 pU
| 2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−12</sup>
|-
| 10<sup>−15</sup>
| Parts per quadrillion
| 2 ppq
| 2 femtouno
| 2 fU
| 2&nbsp;×&nbsp;10<sup>−15</sup>
|}
 
==Footnotes==
In 2004, a report to the [[International Committee for Weights and Measures]] (CIPM) stated that response to the proposal of the uno "had been almost entirely negative", and the principal proponent "recommended dropping the idea".<ref>{{cite web |title=Report of the 16th meeting (13–14 May 2004) to the International Committee for Weights and Measures, of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures |author=Consultative Committee for Units |date=13–14 May 2004 |url=http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CCU16.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140310054340/http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/pdf/CCU16.pdf |archive-date=2014-03-10}}</ref> To date, the uno has not been adopted by any [[standards organization]], and it appears unlikely that it will ever become an officially sanctioned way to express low-value (high-ratio) dimensionless quantities. The proposal was instructive, however, as to the perceived shortcomings of the current options for denoting dimensionless quantities.
{{notelist}}
 
==See also==
Line 325 ⟶ 264:
{{wiktionary|ppm|ppb|ppt|ppq}}
* {{Commonscatinline}}
* [https://www.nist.gov/ National Institute of Standards and Technology] (NIST): [https://www.nist.gov/ Home page]
* [https://www.bipm.org/en/ International Bureau of Weights and Measures] (BIPM): [http://www.bipm.org/en/home/ Home page]
 
[[Category:Analytical chemistry]]