Nursing Times: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
reformatting
FrescoBot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: link syntax and minor changes
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 34:
Founded by Macmillan and Co Ltd, the first edition of Nursing Times was published on Saturday 6 May, 1905. The print edition of Nursing Times is currently published on a monthly basis, having been published weekly until January 2017. As well as the 2017 relaunch, Nursing Times underwent a previous major redesign in March 2009.<ref name="sbro">{{cite news|author=Stephen Brook|date=31 March 2009|title=Nursing Times relaunches with new design|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/media/2009/mar/31/nursing-times-relaunches|accessdate=7 January 2017}}</ref>
 
''Nursing Times'' has regularly run campaigns on issues affecting nurses including most recently Time Out for Training (2008), A Seat on the Board (2010-20112010–2011), Speak Out Safely (2013-20142013–2014) and Covid-19: Are You OK (2020-2020–).
 
In 2018, ''Nursing Times'' was inducted into the International Academy of Nursing Editors’ [https://nursingeditors.com/inane-nursing-journal-hall-of-fame/ Nursing Journal Hall of Fame]. It was named Special Interest Magazine of the Year at the 2019 Periodical Press Association Awards (PPAs).  
 
From July 2004 to July 2005 ''Nursing Times'' sold nearly 72,166 copies. The magazine had a circulation of 30,923 copies in 2008.
Line 55:
 
=== ''Nursing Times'' between 1905 and 1910 ===
''Nursing Times'' <ref>{{cite web |last1=Shuttleworth |first1=Anne |title=Nursing Times between 1905 and 1910 |url=https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/history-of-nursing/a-history-of-nursing-in-britain-1905-1910-19-11-2021/ |access-date=17 January 2024 |website=Nursing Times |publisher=emap}}</ref> did not so much burst on the scene as tap on the door and wait to be invited in. Publishing was a genteel business in 1905, and this was very much the tone of the early ''Nursing Times''.
 
The editor for the first 21 years was Swanhilde Bulan, a German-born journalist. Preferring anonymity, she was never identified on ''Nursing Times''’ pages.
Line 71:
Readers’ wider interests were also catered for with holiday reports, recipes and information on modern hobbies such as photography and cycling.
 
=== ''Nursing Times'' during 1911-201911–20 ===
Recognising the practical nature of its readers, in 1912 ''Nursing Times'' <ref>{{cite web |last1=Shuttleworth |first1=Anne |title=A history of nursing in Britain: the 1910s |url=https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/history-of-nursing/a-history-of-nursing-in-britain-the-1910s-11-10-2021/ |access-date=17 January 2024 |website=Nursing Times |publisher=emap}}</ref> organised one of its earliest competitions – for inventions and ideas. The journal had a stall at the London Nursing and Midwifery Exhibition, on which it planned to display inventions by nurses, midwives, masseuses and [[Health visitor|health visitors]].
 
In order to attract submissions for the exhibition, it offered prizes for the best entries in two classes. Class I, was for ‘any invention not yet on the market or any clever device or idea’ and had a first prize of £10 and a gold medal, while the first prize for Class II (any invention already on the market) was £5 and a gold medal.
Line 104:
 
=== ''Nursing Times'' during the 1930s ===
After 35 years in which its appearance had barely changed, ''Nursing Times'' <ref>{{cite web |last1=Shuttleworth |first1=Anne |title=A history of nursing in Britain: the 1930s |url=https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/history-of-nursing/a-history-of-nursing-in-britain-the-1930s-26-08-2021/ |access-date=17 January 2024 |website=Nursing Times |publisher=emap}}</ref> updated its look in 1939. The staid front covers filled with long editorial comment and full-page advertisements were replaced by a black and white photograph and blue surround.
 
An editorial comment in 1932 argued against a paper presented at the National Association for the Prevention of [[Tuberculosis]] conference. The speaker had claimed that recreation and lack of sleep put young people at risk of TB. ''Nursing Times'' was unconvinced. ‘An occasional late night spent at the cinema or in the dance-hall hurts nobody – on the contrary it supplies a needed mental fillip.’
Line 121:
 
=== ''Nursing Times'' during the 1940s ===
War brought new clinical challenges to health professionals – mainly in the shape of traumatic injuries they would rarely if ever see in peacetime. Like their medical colleagues nurses needed to learn quickly how to care for these injuries, and ''Nursing Times'' <ref>{{cite web |last1=Shuttleworth |first1=Anne |title=A history of nursing in Britain: the 1940s |url=https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/history-of-nursing/a-history-of-nursing-in-britain-the-1940s-26-08-2021/ |access-date=17 January 2024 |website=Nursing Times |publisher=emap}}</ref> was on hand to support them with its clinical material.
 
An article in 1941 discussed the treatment of war burns, explaining the pathological processes involved in burn injuries and the shock precipitated in many severely burned patients. It also advised how to care for patients in primary shock: ‘Patients are often very apprehensive. They think they are going to die or be disfigured for life. A sympathetic, tactful and firm nurse will often quickly overcome these fears and enable the patient to get some sleep.’
Line 142:
''Nursing Times'' became available at newsagents for the first time in 1951 and its price rose by 50% to 6d (2.5p) and an average issue now contained 90 pages.
 
In 1957, ''Nursing Times'' editor Marjorie Wenger contributed to a lively debate over the role of nursing which had been discussed in ''[[The Lancet]]''. She said that real nursing involved the ‘care of a patient as a whole person and is not necessarily confined to the bedside’.
 
The image of nursing in the 1950s still caught the public attention as it does now. In 1958, the [[Department of Health and Social Care|Ministry of Health]] launched a training film about lifting that featured nurses dressed in swimming costumes so that the ‘movements and strains on the limbs are seen clearly’.
Line 179:
 
=== ''Nursing Times'' during the 1980s ===
''Nursing Times'' <ref>{{cite web |last1=O'Dowd |first1=Adrian |title=A history of nursing in Britain: the 1980s |url=https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/history-of-nursing/a-history-of-nursing-in-britain-the-1980s-11-10-2021/ |access-date=17 January 2024 |website=Nursing Times |publisher=emap}}</ref> decade started with a ‘Save It’ campaign aimed at nurses looking for ways to save the NHS money, so that more could be spent on better patient care.
 
This prompted many interesting suggestions including dispensing with nurses’ paper caps, reducing spending on advertising for nurses, and lists to be given to ward sisters with prices of all supplies and cheaper alternatives to them.
Line 197:
In the midst of nationwide industrial action taking place in 1988, a ''Nursing Times'' editorial by [[Niall Dickson]] said: ‘Action must involve not a few thousand but hundreds of thousands and, above all, it must be targeted at the government without so much as harming a hair on a single patient’s head.’
 
=== Nursing Times''Nursing Times'' during the 1990s and early 2000s ===
The 1990s and 2000s saw ''Nursing Times'' <ref>{{cite web |last1=O'Dowd |first1=Adrian |title=A history of nursing in Britain: the 1990s to 2005 |url=https://www.nursingtimes.net/news/history-of-nursing/a-history-of-nursing-in-britain-the-1990s-to-2005-26-08-2021/ |access-date=17 January 2024 |website=Nursing Times |publisher=emap}}</ref> run many campaigns. In 1992 ''Nursing Times'' launched the Mind Your Back campaign, calling for nurses to have the right to be protected from back injury caused by inappropriate lifting and for full implementation of new EC rules on manual handling. Up to 3,600 nurses were leaving their jobs every year because of back injuries, at a loss of 1.3 million working days. ''Nursing Times'' editor John Gilbert said: ‘The scandal of nurses leaving the profession in pain and with their lives and careers in tatters must end.’
 
''Nursing Times'' launched Open Learning in 1991, the distance learning package for enrolled nurse conversion.
Line 208:
A [[Ipsos MORI|MORI]] survey carried out in late 1999 by ''Nursing Times'' and the RCN about the public’s attitude to nurses revealed that, compared to the very same questions posed in a survey in 1984, nurses had an enhanced public image as better educated, more likely to challenge doctors, and more feisty when it came to campaigning on pay.
 
Early in the new millennium Nursing Times''Nursing Times''’ 2001 Save Nurses from Stalkers campaign was a response to new legislation allowing the public to demand nurses’ home addresses. This was widely branded as a ‘stalkers’ charter’ and 7,000 ''Nursing Times'' readers signed a petition demanding this part of the legislation be changed. The threat was removed as the final legislation said a nurse’s home address would not be published or given without their permission.
 
In 2004 ''Nursing Times'' ran a Fairness on Fees campaign to force the NMC to think again on its proposal to increase the three-year registration fee from £60 to £144. Around 13,000 nurses wrote to ''Nursing Times'' in support of the campaign and these were presented to the NMC. The fee rise was reduced to £129 as a result, an estimated saving of £10m for the nursing workforce.
Line 220:
==External links==
*{{Official website|https://www.nursingtimes.net/}}
{{Nursing in the United Kingdom}}
 
[[Category:1905 establishments in the United Kingdom]]
[[Category:Ascential]]