National debt of the United States: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
SiennaVue (talk | contribs)
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 313:
 
===Chinese holdings of U.S. debt===
According to a 2013 [[Forbes]] article, many American and other [[Financial analyst|economic analysts]] have expressed concerns on the amount of United States government debt the People's Republic of China is holding as part of their reserves.<ref>[https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2013/01/23/is-chinas-ownership-of-u-s-debt-a-national-security-threat/#41479958afa3 "Is China's Ownership Of U.S. Debt A National Security Threat?"] by Kenneth Rapoza, ''[[Forbes]]'', 23 January 2013</ref><ref name="cnn">"... Should Americans be concerned that China has started dumping some of its Treasury holdings? After all, it raises serious questions about whether China will keep lending Washington money to help finance the federal deficit in the future.": From [https://money.cnn.com/2015/09/10/investing/china-dumping-us-debt "China is dumping U.S. debt"], CNN.com, September 11, 2015.</ref> as part of their reserves. The [[National Defense Authorization Act]] of FY2012 included a provision requiring the [[United States Secretary of Defense|Secretary of Defense]] to conduct a "national security risk assessment of U.S. federal debt held by China." The department issued its report in July 2012, stating that "attempting to use U.S. Treasury securities as a coercive tool would have limited effect and likely would do more harm to China than to the United States.” {{citation needed|date=April 2024}} An August 19, 2013 [[Congressional Research Service]] report said that the threat is not credible and the effect would be limited even if carried out. The report said that the threat would not offer "China deterrence options, whether in the diplomatic, military, or economic realms, and this would remain true both in peacetime and in scenarios of crisis or war."<ref name="labonte">[https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL34314.pdf Report] on "China's Holdings of U.S. Securities: Implications for the U.S. Economy" by Wayne M. Morrison & Marc Labonte, [[Congressional Research Service]], 19 August 2013</ref>
 
A 2010 article by [[James K. Galbraith]] in ''[[The Nation]]'', defends deficits and dismisses concerns over foreign holdings of United States government debt denominated in U.S. dollars, including China's holdings.<ref name="james">: "...&nbsp;What about indebtedness to foreigners?&nbsp;... To acquire [U.S. gov't bonds], China must export goods to us, not offset by equivalent imports. That is a cost to China. It's a cost [[Government of China|Beijing]] is prepared to pay, for its own reasons: export industries promote learning, technology transfer and product quality improvement, and they provide jobs to migrants from the countryside. But that's China's business. For China, the bonds themselves are a sterile [[hoard]]. There is almost nothing that Beijing can do with them;&nbsp;... its stock of T-bonds will just go on growing. And we will pay interest on it, not with real effort but by typing numbers into computers. There is no burden associated with this; not now and not later." From [http://www.thenation.com/article/defense-deficits/ "In Defense of Deficits"] by [[James K. Galbraith]], ''[[The Nation]]'', March 4, 2010.</ref> In 2010, [[Warren Mosler]], wrote that "When[ever] the Chinese redeem those T-securities, the money is transferred back to China's checking account at the Fed. During the entire purchase and redemption process, the dollars never leave the Fed."<ref name="mosler">"...&nbsp;The Chinese buy U.S. T-securities by transferring U.S. dollars (not yuan) from their checking account at the Federal Reserve Bank to China's T-security account, also at the Federal Reserve Bank. When[ever] the Chinese redeem those T-securities, the money is transferred back to China's checking account at the Fed. During the entire purchase and redemption process, the dollars never leave the Fed." [http://moslereconomics.com/2010/09/23/what-policies-for-global-prosperity/ "What Policies for Global Prosperity?"] by [[Warren Mosler]], September 23, 2010.</ref> Australian economist [[Bill Mitchell (economist)|Bill Mitchell]] argued that the United States government had a "nearly infinite capacity...to spend."<ref name="mitchell">[[Bill Mitchell (economist)|Mitchell, Bill]], [[University of Newcastle (Australia)]]. [http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=18813 "The nearly infinite capacity of the US government to spend"] (March 28, 2012); [http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/?p=25161 "The US government can buy as much of its own debt as it chooses"] (August 27, 2013)</ref> Against the backdrop of escalating Sino-U.S. tensions in 2020, Yuzo Sakai, a manager at Ueda Totan Forex Ltd., said that if China undertakes a massive sales of U.S. bonds, investors may flock to the [[Japanese yen]] as a safe-haven currency. Since 2018, China had been gradually decreasing its holdings of U.S. federal debt, bringing the total to $1.07 trillion in June 2020, behind Japan who became the biggest foreign creditor of the United States. Stephen Nagy, a professor at the [[International Christian University]], said a sell-off by China "might damage the United States in the short term" but also cause "critical economic instability" in the Chinese and global economy. [[Jeff Kingston]], a professor and director of Asian Studies at [[Temple University, Japan Campus|Temple University, Japan]], echoed the view, adding that dumping would lower the price of U.S. bonds, making it more attractive to other countries. According to an [[institutional investor]], however, it may be difficult for Japan to boost its already large holdings of U.S. government debt, as such a move could be seen as "currency manipulation".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Tachikawa |first=Tomoyuki |date=Aug 20, 2020 |title=Fears grow over China's possible massive sales of U.S. debt as weapon |url=https://english.kyodonews.net/news/2020/08/fb165250518a-focus-fears-grow-over-chinas-possible-massive-sales-of-us-debt-as-weapon.html |website=Kyodo News+}}</ref>
Line 349:
The [[Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget]] estimated that the budget deficit for fiscal year 2020 would increase to a record $3.8&nbsp;trillion (~${{Format price|{{Inflation|index=US-GDP|value=3800000000000|start_year=2020}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US-GDP}}), or 18.7% GDP.<ref name="CRFB_CARES1">{{Cite web |title=NYT-Reuters-U.S. Deficit to Soar to Record $3.8 Trillion in 2020, Budget Watchdog Group Says-April 13, 2020 |url=https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/04/13/us/13reuters-health-coronavirus-usa-budget.html |website=[[The New York Times]]}}</ref> For scale, in 2009 the budget deficit reached 9.8% GDP ($1.4&nbsp;trillion nominal dollars) in the depths of the [[Great Recession]]. CBO forecast in January 2020 that the budget deficit in FY2020 would be $1.0&nbsp;trillion (~${{Format price|{{Inflation|index=US-GDP|value=1000000000000|start_year=2020}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US-GDP}}), prior to considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic or CARES.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 28, 2020 |title=The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2020 to 2030 &#124; Congressional Budget Office |url=https://www.cbo.gov/publication/56020 |website=www.cbo.gov}}</ref> CFRB further estimated that the national debt would reach 106% of U.S. GDP in September 2020, a record since the aftermath of World War II.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Lynch |first1=David J. |date=18 April 2020 |title=Record government and corporate debt risks 'tipping point' after pandemic passes |language=en |newspaper=[[The Washington Post]] |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2020/04/18/record-government-corporate-debt-risk-tipping-point-after-pandemic-passes/ |access-date=19 April 2020}}</ref>
 
[[President Biden]] also allocated significant amounts of money towards relief of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]]. According to a May 2021 report, Biden has or plans to spend $5.72 (~${{Format price|{{Inflation|index=US-GDP|value=5720000000000|start_year=2021}}}} in {{Inflation/year|US-GDP}}) trillion dollars toward this effort and others such as climate change including providing stimulus checks and serving schools and low-income children.<ref>{{cite news |last=Tankersley |first=Jim |date=April 9, 2021 |title=Biden's Budget Includes $1.52 Trillion in Federal Spending |work=[[The New York Times]] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/04/09/us/biden-news-today}}</ref> Many economists have agreed that this unprecedented level of spending from the [[Presidency of Joe Biden|Biden Administration]] has, in part, contributed to the [[2021–20222021–2023 inflation surge|inflation surge offrom 2021 andto 20222023]] as a result of increasing the money supply in the economy.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Morgan |first=David |date=2021-11-01 |title=Explainer: Republicans blame Biden for inflation, but are they right? |language=en |work=[[Reuters]] |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/us/republicans-blame-biden-inflation-are-they-right-2021-11-01/ |access-date=2022-03-24}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Tolliver |first=Sandy |date=2022-02-25 |title=Runaway inflation discredits Democrats' fiscal and monetary policy |url=https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/595019-runaway-inflation-discredits-democrats-fiscal-and-monetary-policy |access-date=2022-03-24 |website=[[The Hill (newspaper)|The Hill]] |language=en}}</ref>
 
==Appendix==
Line 583:
===Foreign holders of U.S. Treasury securities===
{{main|United States Treasury security#International}}
The following is a list of the top foreign holders <!--(>$150 billion)--> of Treasury securities as listed by the Federal Reserve Board (revised by MarchApril 2024 survey):<ref>{{cite web |url=https://ticdata.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/tic/Documents/slt_table5.html |title=Major Foreign Holders of Treasury Securities |publisher=Department of the Treasury/Federal Reserve Board |date=MayJune 1518, 2024}}</ref>
{| class=wikitable
! colspan=3|{{nowrap|Leading foreign holders of U.S. Treasury securities as of MarchApril 2024}}
|-
! Country or region!!{{center|Billions of<br/>dollars (est.)}}!!{{center|% change since<br/>MarchApril 2023}}
|-
| {{JPN}} || {{center|1,187150.83}} || {{center|+ 92%}}
|-
| {{CHN}} || {{center|767770.47}} || {{center|{{fontcolor|red|−12−11%}}}}
|-
| {{GBR}} || {{center|728710.12}} || {{center|+ 314%}}
|-
| {{LUX}} || {{center|399384.34}} || {{center|+2216%}}
|-
| {{CAN}} || {{center|359338.12}} || {{center|+4637%}}
|-
| {{IRLCYM}} || {{center|317319.84}} || {{center|+2616%}}
|-
| {{BEL}} || {{center|317312.14}} || {{center|{{fontcolor|red|− 67%}}}}
|-
| {{CYMIRL}} || {{center|302307.96}} || {{center|+ 526%}}
|-
| {{FRA}} || {{center|283276.15}} || {{center|+5448%}}
|-
| {{CHE}} || {{center|262272.90}} || {{center|{{fontcolor|red|−14− 9%}}}}
|-
| {{TWN}} || {{center|259257.03}} || {{center|+ 85%}}
|-
| {{IND}} || {{center|240233.65}} || {{center|+{{fontcolor|red|− 12%}}}}
|-
| {{BRA}} || {{center|227223.16}} || {{center|+{{fontcolor|red|− 13%}}}}
|-
| {{SGPHKG}} || {{center|208220.09}} || {{center|+{{fontcolor|red|− 71%}}}}
|-
| {{HKGSGP}} || {{center|202207.25}} || {{center|{{fontcolor|red|−+ 93%}}}}
|-
| '''other''' || {{center|2,029033.45}} || {{center|+1011%}}
|-
! {{left|Total}} || {{center|8,091018.80}} || {{center|+ 7%}}
|}