Talk:Vicky Kaushal: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Talk header|search=yes}}
{{GA|08:03, 7 April 2019 (UTC)|page=1|topic=Media and drama|oldid=891338108}}
{{Top 25 report|Dec 5 2021|Dec 12 2021}}
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|listas=Kaushal, Vicky
{{WikiProject banner shell|living=yes|class=GA|listas=Kaushal, Vicky|1=
|filmbio-priority=Low|filmbio-work-group=yes|class=GA}}
{{WikiProject IndiaBiography|class=GA|importancefilmbio-priority=Low|delhifilmbio-work-group=yes|maharashtra-importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject India|importance=Mid|delhi=yes|mumbai=yes|mumbai-importance=LowMid|delhi-importance=Mid|assess-date=January 2022}}
}}
{{Press
| subject = page
| author = Samadder, Tulika
| title = বিয়ের আগেই উইকিপিডিয়া বিয়ে দিয়ে দিল ভিকি-ক্যাটের! হাসির খোরাক পেল সোশ্যাল মিডিয়া
| org = [[Hindustan Times]] ''(Bengali edition)''
| url = https://bangla.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/katrina-kaif-and-vicky-kaushal-s-wikipedia-pages-updated-with-spouse-name-fans-are-laughing-31638968472632.html
| date = 2021-12-08
| quote = {{translation}} - Katrina Kaif and Vicky Kaushal's Wikipedia pages updated with spouse name, fans are laughing.
| archiveurl =
| archivedate =
| accessdate = 2021-12-08
 
Line 22 ⟶ 21:
|title2 = Katrina Kaif And Vicky Kaushal's Wikipedia Pages Updated Ahead Of Wedding. Then...
|org2 = [[NDTV]]
|archiveurl2 = https://web.archive.org/web/20211208125049/https://www.ndtv.com/entertainment/katrina-kaif-and-vicky-kaushals-wedding-the-wikipedia-mystery-spouse-tab-updated-then-undone-2642270
|archivedate2 = 2021-12-08
|accessdate2 = 2021-12-08
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{Top 25 report|Dec 5 2021|Dec 12 2021}}
|maxarchivesize = 130K
== Awards ==
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 3
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Vicky Kaushal/Archive %(counter)d
}}
 
== Lead has too many minor details ==
{{Ping|DarpSinghh}} Re: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicky_Kaushal&diff=822655836&oldid=815599111 this edit], I've removed the Films of India Online Awards. There are thousands of minor awards "organisations" across the globe, many of them run by regular people, like bloggers, or even people who work for marketing groups who just want to promote their clients in some way. We simply can't entertain these non-notable awards, lest every article about an actor or film would be stuffed with meaningless accolades. We only care about established awards from notable organisations. As a general rule, if an awards organisation doesn't have a well-established article at Wikipedia (where someone has already gone through the effort of demonstrating [[WP:GNG|notability]]) that has survived community scrutiny for a few years, then we should ignore that organisation. Thanks for understanding, [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 06:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 
{{u|Meryam90}} Would you explain why you reverted me [[Special:Diff/1068687322|here]]? There is no reason why films like Manmarziyan/Love per sq ft, which literally have two lines of text in the body, need to be mentioned '''thrice''' - once in the lead, once in body and once in filmography. [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 03:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
== Semi-protected edit request on 31 January 2019 ==
 
I respect your point of view but the edit you have made has completely cut the lead by half and deleted several informations that were mention worthy: informations that were approved on the lead section during the GA review itself. You took it from three paragraphs to one and completely undermined previews edits/work, that was not acceptable.
{{edit semi-protected|Vicky Kaushal|answered=yes}}
Add the fact Kaushal wins Supporting Actor for Sanju for the 4th FOI awards
 
Making improvements is welcomed but completely deleting major points that are valid like education/forbes rankings, that was for me an impulsive edit on your part. So I reverted to the previous version and as you can see I totally agree to the rest of changes you made to the body of the article. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User: Meryam90| Meryam90]] ([[User talk: Meryam90#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ Meryam90|contribs]]) 2022-01-30T03:32:35 (UTC)</span>
https://www.foionlineawards.com/4th-foi-online-awards [[User:Correctoryamum|Correctoryamum]] ([[User talk:Correctoryamum|talk]]) 21:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> appears like a non notable award, being added for Promotional purposes ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 18:51, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
 
:{{u|Meryam90}}, To clarify, I did not remove any information in that edit; they are all still in the body text. I've reverted you since you seem to have misunderstood that edit.
== Uri ==
 
:Coming to the issue, I am questioning why things like schooling, supporting roles etc need to be mentioned in the lead. As you can see, [[Special:Permalink/891338108|the GA approved version]] had a lead of '''two''' paragraphs, half the length before my edit (GA version itself had too many unnecessary details). What is the necessity of mentioning some minor films '''thrice''' in the article? [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 05:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Not sure where [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicky_Kaushal&type=revision&diff=884211551&oldid=884208368 this hostility] is coming from, {{u|Cyphoidbomb}}, but I'm only following what [https://www.bollywoodhungama.com/news/box-office-special-features/box-office-uri-surgical-strike-breaks-top-15-time-highest-grossers-just-30-days-amavas-doesnt-grow/ the source says]. Also, I fail to see why writing something negative about a person makes the article "balanced" but writing something positive about a person is automatically seen as "puffery" by some people. If sources are reporting a film's incredible box office performance, then the article needs to reflect that. Period. [[User:Krimuk2.0|Krimuk2.0]] ([[User talk:Krimuk2.0|talk]]) 06:13, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
:{{ping|Krimuk2.0}} It's not intended as hostility toward you, but your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vicky_Kaushal&diff=next&oldid=880809188 first submission] described it as a "top grosser" which implies it was #1, when it clearly was not when compared against the history of top grossers. That looked very much like puffery, even if you didn't mean it to be. "Balanced" would have been saying that it placed Nth among Hindi language film releases in 2019, for instance. And where is the official top 25 highest-grossing Indian films list as published by the majority of proper sources, so that we can accurately assign a placement of this film against those from history? Not surprisingly, the Indian entertainment machine has failed us again by neglecting to do their own ranking, but we should not be using Wikipedia's ranking for this purpose, so I don't know why we keep pointing to [[:List of highest-grossing Indian films]] as though that's an official list. Anyway, again, it was nothing personal, but we need to be more careful about how these "records" are presented. [[User:Cyphoidbomb|Cyphoidbomb]] ([[User talk:Cyphoidbomb|talk]]) 06:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
::"top-grossing" doesn't indicate number 1 at all. It indicates a high level of commercial success, but if there's a better way to say it, I'm all for it. Sources describe ''Uri''{{'s}} [https://www.timesnownews.com/entertainment/box-office/article/uri-box-office-collection-day-28-vicky-kaushal-starrer-hits-a-double-century-earns-rs-200-07-crore/362286 success as "historic"]. Using a word like that would be puffery, but we do need to stress on how big of a hit it is, which is what I was trying to do. No way was I trying to "inflate the film's success", and I absolutely do not appreciate being blamed for something like that after contributing so much on Wikipedia for almost 8 years now. [[User:Krimuk2.0|Krimuk2.0]] ([[User talk:Krimuk2.0|talk]]) 06:39, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 
please refrain from reverting back for now till this discussion is resolved. A bit of restrain a maturity would be appreciated here. Ok?
{{Talk:Vicky Kaushal/GA1}}
 
As for you understanding of my explanation, I said you have shortened the lead TOO MUCH and it is no longer a representation of the body of the article. Because you don't see the point of why some tings are mentioned is not enough reason to take them out. And like you said, the GA version had a substantial lead paragraphs, contrary to the bleak version you have left after your edit. And his career has expanded since so more info have been added. If you have a look at most autobiographies especially those of Featured and good articles of Bollywood actors, mentioning all those notable achievements is a recurrence. Absolutely nothing odd about it.
== Personal life ==
 
if you have removed the names of the films you have an issue with, sure no problem, but you went on an accessible trim that completely undermined the lead section. If you want us to work on it to see where we can agree on the parts that need to be removed, I am more than happy to do so, but the length and quality of the version of your edit is not suitable for the quality of the article or the subject matter at all.<!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Meryam90|Meryam90]] ([[User talk:Meryam90#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Meryam90|contribs]]) 2022-01-30T05:32:37 (UTC)</span>
The article ahs seen an number of recent unsourced attempts to variously claim that he is engaged to [[Katrina Kaif]], or that he has already married her. Please don't add claims that he is engaged, or even already married. I've taken a quick look for sources, and what I see are social media and tabloid rumours and speculation, none of which can be considered reliable sources. It is a [[WP:BLP]] violation to make such claims without reliable sources, let alone without any sources. [[User:Meters|Meters]] ([[User talk:Meters|talk]]) 20:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
: Instead of subjective notions of "undermining", "bleak" etc, can you answer a specific question - why should schooling, support roles be mentioned '''twice''' or '''thrice''' in an encyclopaedic article? Please don't say look at [[WP:OSE|other articles]] (GA can and is known to be gamed); but do point to a single FA that mentions an award twice in lead and again twice in body. Lead is supposed to be a summary, not a total repeat of the body. [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 05:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 
{{od}}
== Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2021 ==
the lead section is a summary to the whole article. Where has the education or Forbes or his movies contribution been mentioned thrice? All those points have been mentioned in their respective sections and summarized in the lead as per wiki policies. Are you suggesting that what is mentioned in the article cannot be in the body? lol. I am not new here, I've been editing wikipedia since 2010. I am well aware of the editing policies for bios.
 
One example comes to mind: [[Priyanka Chopra]] (and mind you, her aspiration for an education has been mentioned not even the actual degree she obtained) . So again, I don't understand why you see the need to shorten the lead section so miserably based on your subjective POV. All points that have been mentioned in the lead are the BIG highlights of the career of the actor so far.
{{edit semi-protected|Vicky Kaushal|answered=yes}}
Vicky kaushal is not married yet [[Special:Contributions/2601:586:8200:640:206E:3C93:DE51:5141|2601:586:8200:640:206E:3C93:DE51:5141]] ([[User talk:2601:586:8200:640:206E:3C93:DE51:5141|talk]]) 21:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 21:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
::I removed her as a spouse in the infobox. [[User:ScottishFinnishRadish|ScottishFinnishRadish]] ([[User talk:ScottishFinnishRadish|talk]]) 21:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
::: Thanks. News media is [https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/vicky-kaushal-katrina-kaif-are-already-married-wikipedia-is-here-for-proof-4531769.html mocking this page ] though {{emoji|1F601}} <span style="font-family:Segoe Script">[[User:Jay| Jay]]</span> [[User talk:Jay|(''talk'')]] 07:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 
Also, GA are what? gamed? we are into conspiracy theories now? if you have so little faith in the integrity of wikipedia and its processes...then, excuse me but I STRONLY disagree with that statement of yours as well...an other example of you undermining yet something else wikipedia related.... <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Meryam90|Meryam90]] ([[User talk:Meryam90#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Meryam90|contribs]]) </span>
== Lead has too many minor details ==
 
:Please sign your statements. How about the following then?
{{u|Meryam90}} Would you explain why you reverted me [[Special:Diff/1068687322|here]]? There is no reason why films like Manmarziyan/Love per sq ft, which literally have two lines of text in the body, need to be mentioned '''thrice''' - once in the lead, once in body and once in filmography. [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 03:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
{{quotebox|'''Vicky Kaushal''' ({{IPA-hns|ˈʋɪkːi ˈkɔːʃəl|pron}}; born 16 May 1988) is an Indian actor who works in [[Bollywood|Hindi films]].
 
After graduating with an engineering degree, Kaushal assisted [[Anurag Kashyap]] in the crime drama ''[[Gangs of Wasseypur]]'' (2012) and went on to play minor roles in two of Kashyap's productions. His first leading role was in ''[[Masaan]]'' (2015). He rose to prominence in 2018 with supporting roles in ''[[Raazi]]'' and ''[[Sanju]]'', two of the highest-grossing [[List of Bollywood films of 2018|Hindi films of the year]]. For ''[[Sanju]]'', he won the [[Filmfare Award for Best Supporting Actor]].
I respect your point of view but the edit you have made has completely cut the lead by half and deleted several informations that were mention worthy: informations that were approved on the lead section during the GA review itself. You took it from three paragraphs to one and completely undermined previews edits/work, that was not acceptable.
 
A starring role as a military officer in ''[[Uri: The Surgical Strike]]'' established him as a leading Bollywood actor. He won the [[National Film Award for Best Actor]] for his role. His portrayal of [[Udham Singh]] in [[Shoojit Sircar]]'s biopic ''[[Sardar Udham]]'' won widespread praise. }}
Making improvements is welcomed but completely deleting major points that are valid like education/forbes rankings, that was for me an impulsive edit on your part. So I reverted to the previous version and as you can see I totally agree to the rest of changes you made to the body of the article. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User: Meryam90| Meryam90]] ([[User talk: Meryam90#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ Meryam90|contribs]]) 2022-01-30T03:32:35 (UTC)</span>
:Specific awards are mentioned. I don't think IIFA/Screen awards are prominent enough to be in lead. There's absolutely no need to mention Manmarziyaan and Love per Sq Ft. Celebrity endorsements are so common that even body text need not have that line. [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 07:13, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 
:: Just add the bit about him being married to Katrina Kaif and we're good to go I say. [[User:KyloRen3|<span style="background:#4b5320; color:white; font-family:Stencil; border-radius:15px; padding:2px;">&nbsp;Kylo&nbsp;Ren&nbsp;III&nbsp;</span>]] ([[User talk:KyloRen3|talk ☎️]]) 07:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
:{{u|Meryam90}}, To clarify, I did not remove any information in that edit; they are all still in the body text. I've reverted you since you seem to have misunderstood that edit.
 
:Coming to the issue, I am questioning why things like schooling, supporting roles etc need to be mentioned in the lead. As you can see, [[Special:Permalink/891338108|the GA approved version]] had a lead of '''two''' paragraphs, half the length before my edit (GA version itself had too many unnecessary details). What is the necessity of mentioning some minor films '''thrice''' in the article? [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 05:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 
please refrain from reverting back for now till this discussion is resolved. A bit of restrain a maturity would be appreciated here. Ok?
 
::: I respect this process of opening a discussion for collaboration instead of whose version of the section is right. I agree with your comment regarding the awards and also the endorsements and I made the appropriate edits. for love per, it is considered a stepping stone for Bollywood's entry into the OTT world hence the worthiness of the mention. for Manmarziyaan I don't care much about it it was added to round up the reasoning why 2018 was a breakthrough year for him <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Meryam90|Meryam90]] ([[User talk:Meryam90#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Meryam90|contribs]]) </span>
As for you understanding of my explanation, I said you have shortened the lead TOO MUCH and it is no longer a representation of the body of the article. Because you don't see the point of why some tings are mentioned is not enough reason to take them out. And like you said, the GA version had a substantial lead paragraphs, contrary to the bleak version you have left after your edit. And his career has expanded since so more info have been added. If you have a look at most autobiographies especially those of Featured and good articles of Bollywood actors, mentioning all those notable achievements is a recurrence. Absolutely nothing odd about it.
 
{{od}}
 
Here, I have reworked it a little bit:
{{tqb|'''Vicky Kaushal''' ({{IPA-hns|ˈʋɪkːi ˈkɔːʃəl|pron}}; born 16 May 1988) is an Indian actor who works in [[Bollywood|Hindi films]]. He is the recipient of a National Film Award and a Filmfare Award, and is married to actress [[Katrina Kaif]].
After graduating with an engineering degree, Kaushal assisted [[Anurag Kashyap]] in the 2012 crime drama ''[[Gangs of Wasseypur]]'' and went on to play minor roles in two of Kashyap's productions. His first leading role was in the 2015 drama ''[[Masaan]]''. He rose to prominence in 2018 with supporting roles in ''[[Raazi]]'' and ''[[Sanju]]'', two of the highest-grossing [[List of Bollywood films of 2018|Hindi films of the year]]. For the latter, he won the [[Filmfare Award for Best Supporting Actor]].
A starring role as a military officer in the 2019 action war film ''[[Uri: The Surgical Strike]]'' established him as a leading Bollywood actor. He won the [[National Film Award for Best Actor]] for his role. His portrayal of [[Udham Singh]] in [[Shoojit Sircar]]'s 2021 biopic ''[[Sardar Udham]]'' won widespread praise.
Kaushal has also appeared in ''[[Forbes India]]''{{'s}} [[Forbes Celebrity 100|Celebrity 100]] list of 2019 and was featured in their [[Forbes 30 Under 30|30 Under 30]] list of 2018.}}
[[User:KyloRen3|<span style="background:#4b5320; color:white; font-family:Stencil; border-radius:15px; padding:2px;">&nbsp;Kylo&nbsp;Ren&nbsp;III&nbsp;</span>]] ([[User talk:KyloRen3|talk ☎️]]) 07:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 
 
lol I am sorry but why mention his marriage first? it isn't related to his work and career which should be taking centre stage and also, his Forbes wins are really necessary <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Meryam90|Meryam90]] ([[User talk:Meryam90#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Meryam90|contribs]]) </span>
 
:Yep, {{noping|KyloRen3}} that's much better. [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 07:48, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 
:: {{u|Meryam90}}, the marriage is mentioned in the first paragraph, after the awards. I think that suffices. The first line should accurately summarise both his life and career since it appears on Google search. And I'm not too sure about the Forbes wins since they're usually just promotional. [[User:KyloRen3|<span style="background:#4b5320; color:white; font-family:Stencil; border-radius:15px; padding:2px;">&nbsp;Kylo&nbsp;Ren&nbsp;III&nbsp;</span>]] ([[User talk:KyloRen3|talk ☎️]]) 08:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
::: Yeah, [[Forbes India]], owned by Swarajya (a blacklisted site) is different from [[WP:FORBES]]. Forbes lists might merit mention, but not lists from Forbes India. [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 08:56, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
:::: They're the same site {{u|Hemantha}}. {{u|Meryam90}}, I have updated my proposal for the lead and added Forbes at the bottom, since it is not as significant as the National or Filmfare Awards. [[User:KyloRen3|<span style="background:#4b5320; color:white; font-family:Stencil; border-radius:15px; padding:2px;">&nbsp;Kylo&nbsp;Ren&nbsp;III&nbsp;</span>]] ([[User talk:KyloRen3|talk ☎️]]) 09:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
::::: No, they aren't the same. See [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_334#Forbes_India_Brand_Connect|this]] as well as the page on [[Forbes India]]. I was wrong about Swarajya owning it though; Swarajya editor became its chief. For example, [https://www.forbes.com/30-under-30/2018/ Forbes 30 under 30 2018 list] doesn't have Kaushal's name at all. That list might be covered under [[WP:FORBES]] entry on [[WP:RSP]] but Forbes India lists aren't noteworthy at all (even for the body, I think, but won't argue about that now). [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 09:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
::::::: I've updated the lead, leaving Forbes India out for now, as per the points listed by you. [[User:KyloRen3|<span style="background:#4b5320; color:white; font-family:Stencil; border-radius:15px; padding:2px;">&nbsp;Kylo&nbsp;Ren&nbsp;III&nbsp;</span>]] ([[User talk:KyloRen3|talk ☎️]]) 09:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
{{od}}
==== Word length inflation is insulting to the subject ====
{{u|Meryam90}}, please read [[MOS:LEAD]] once and then justify [[Special:Diff/1069737408|this revert]]. An unsuccessful movie rarely makes someone established, so "commercially and critically successful" (identified as [[WP:PEACOCK]] by [[MOS:INTRO]] as well) is redundant. How could you say "garnered further widespread praise" (more peacock words) when none of the previous sentences say anything about praise? Your idea of quality seems unnecessarily focused on word length. [[User:Hemantha|hemantha]] ([[User talk:Hemantha|brief]]) 01:58, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 
== Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2022 ==
 
{{Edit semi-protected|Vicky Kaushal|answered=yes}}
Sardar Udham , Lust Stories and Love per Square feet are direct OTT movies , there was no theatrical release for them , mention the ott platform of these movies in notes [[User:Rhea786656|Rhea786656]] ([[User talk:Rhea786656|talk]]) 20:55, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Aaron Liu|Aaron Liu]] ([[User talk:Aaron Liu|talk]]) 23:46, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 
== Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2023 ==
 
{{Edit semi-protected|Vicky Kaushal|answered=yes}}
if you have removed the names of the films you have an issue with, sure no problem, but you went on an accessible trim that completely undermined the lead section. If you want us to work on it to see where we can agree on the parts that need to be removed, I am more than happy to do so, but the length and quality of the version of your edit is not suitable for the quality of the article or the subject matter at all.
Adding information about his parents and his brother sunny [[User:Yunik.salvi|Yunik.salvi]] ([[User talk:Yunik.salvi|talk]]) 19:23, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> [[User:Lightoil|Lightoil]] ([[User talk:Lightoil|talk]]) 03:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)