Simplicidentata: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Joscquin (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mdj1122 (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Group of mammals}}
'''Simplicidenta''' are a group of mammals which contains [[Rodentia|Rodents]] and the extinct group [[Mixodontia]]. Thus, regarding only extant species, Simplicidentata are equivalent to Rodents.
{{Automatic taxobox
| fossil_range = [[Early Paleocene]] to present
| image = Oryzomys palustris in vegetation.jpg
| image_caption = [[Marsh rice rat]] (''Oryzomys palustris'')
| taxon = Simplicidentata
| authority = Weber, 1904
| subdivision_ranks = Orders
| subdivision =
* {{extinct}}[[Mixodontia]]
* [[Rodentia]]
* {{extinct}}[[Sinomylus]]
}}
 
'''Simplicidentata''' is a group of [[mammal]]s that includes the [[rodent]]s (order Rodentia) and their closest extinct relatives. The term has historically been used as an alternative to Rodentia, contrasting the rodents (which have one pair of upper incisors) with their close relatives the [[lagomorph]]s (which have two).<ref>Landry, 1999, p. 286</ref> However, Simplicidentata is now defined as including all members of [[Glires]] (the [[clade]] formed by lagomorphs and rodents) that share a more recent common ancestor with living rodents than with living lagomorphs. Thus, Simplicidentata is a [[total group]] that is more inclusive than Rodentia, a [[crown group]] that includes all living rodents, their last common ancestor, and all its descendants.<ref>Meng et al., 2009, p. 1</ref> Under this definition, the loss of the second pair of upper incisors is a [[synapomorphic]] (shared derived) feature of Simplicidentata.<ref>Meng and Wyss, 1994, p. 201</ref> The loss of the second upper [[premolar]] (P2) has also been considered as synapomorphic for Simplicidentata, but the primitive simplicidentate ''[[Sinomylus]]'' does have a P2.<ref>McKenna and Meng, 2001, p. 565</ref>
==See also==
 
*[[Rodentia]]
This sense of Simplicidentata was introduced by Chuankui Li and colleagues in 1987, who ranked Simplicidentata as a [[superorder]] including Rodentia and the extinct [[Mixodontia]], contrasted with the superorder [[Duplicidentata]] (including Lagomorpha and the extinct [[Mimotonida]]).<ref>Meng and Wyss, 1994, p. 199</ref> In their 1997 book ''Classification of Mammals'', [[Malcolm C. McKenna]] and Susan K. Bell ranked Simplicidentata as a [[mirorder]] within the [[grandorder]] [[Anagalida]] (also including lagomorphs, [[macroscelidea]]ns, and some additional extinct groups). Within Simplicidentata, they recognized the orders Mixodontia (including only the extinct family [[Eurymylidae]] from the [[Paleocene]] and [[Eocene]] of Asia) and Rodentia.<ref>McKenna and Bell, 1997, p. 113</ref> McKenna and Bell's decision to use Simplicidentata was criticized by reviewer Frederick S. Szalay, who preferred to simply place the Mixodontia within Rodentia, which would leave Simplicidentata unnecessary.<ref>Szalay, 1999, p. 194</ref> In ''The Beginning of the Age of Mammals'' (2006), Kenneth Rose recognized a mirorder Simplicidentata, including Mixodontia, Rodentia, and the genus ''Sinomylus'' (not placed in either order), within the superorder Anagalida.<ref>Rose, 2006, pp. 9, 315</ref>
*[[Epitheria]]
 
*[[Mammals]]
==References==
*[[Phylogenetic tree]]
{{Reflist}}
 
==Literature cited==
*Landry, S.O., Jr. 1999. A proposal for a new classification and nomenclature for the Glires (Lagomorpha and Rodentia). Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Zoologische Reihe 75(2):283–316.
*McKenna, M.C. and Bell, S.K. 1997. Classification of Mammals: Above the species level. New York: Columbia University Press, 631&nbsp;pp. {{ISBN|978-0-231-11013-6}}
*McKenna, M.C. and Meng, J. 2001. A primitive relative of rodents from the Chinese Paleocene. ''Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology'' 21(3):565–572.
*Meng, J. and Wyss, A.R. 1994. Enamel microstructure of Tribosphenomys (Mammalia, Glires): Character analysis and systematic implications. ''Journal of Mammalian Evolution'' 2(3):185–203.
*Meng, J. and Wyss, A.R. 2001. The morphology of Tribosphenomys (Rodentiaformes, Mammalia): phylogenetic implications for basal Glires. ''Journal of Mammalian Evolution'' 8(1):1–71.
*Meng, J., Hu, Y. and Li, C. 2003. The osteology of ''Rhombomylus'' (Mammalia, Glires): implications for phylogeny and evolution of Glires. ''Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History'', 275:1–247.
*Meng, J., Kraatz, B.P., Wang, Y., Ni, X., Gebo, D.L. and Beard, K.C. 2009. A new species of Gomphos (Glires, Mammalia) from the Eocene of the Erlian Basin, Nei Mongol, China. ''American Museum Novitates'' 3670:1–11.
*Rose, K.D. 2006. The Beginning of the Age of Mammals. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 428&nbsp;pp. {{ISBN|978-0-8018-8472-6}}
*Szalay, F.S. 1999. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/4523980 <nowiki>[Review of]</nowiki> Classification of Mammals: Above the Species Level] (subscription required). ''Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology'' 19(1):191–195.
 
{{Taxonbar|from=Q7520911}}
 
[[Category:Mammal unranked clades]]