Royal assent: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m Undid edits by 2603:6080:E5F0:9F0:D162:F3FC:BADC:F336 (talk) to last version by Sunsetside: nonconstructive edits
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 16:
{{See also|Royal Assent Act 1967}}
 
Before the [[Royal Assent by Commission Act 1541]] allowed for delegation of the power to [[Lords Commissioners]], assent was always required to be given by the Sovereign in person before Parliament.<ref>{{cite book |last=Carroll |first=Alex |date=1998 |title=Constitutional and Administrative Law |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FU1KAQAAIAAJ |location=London |publisher=Financial Times/Prentice Hall |page=207 |isbn=978-0273625711}}</ref> The last time it was given by the Sovereign in person in Parliament was during the reign of [[Queen Victoria]] at a [[Prorogation in the United Kingdom|prorogation]] on 12 August 1854.<ref>{{cite book |date=1976 |editor-first=David |editor-last=Lidderdale |title=[[Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice|Erskine May's Treatise on The Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament]] |edition=19th |isbn=0-406-29102-0 |page=564|publisher=Butterworths }}</ref>{{efn|This was also the last occasion on which Parliament was prorogued by the monarch in person<ref>{{cite book |date=1976 |editor-first=David |editor-last=Lidderdale |title=[[Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice|Erskine May's Treatise on The Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament]] |edition=19th |isbn=0-406-29102-0 |page=261|publisher=Butterworths }}</ref>}} The Act was repealed and replaced by the [[Royal Assent Act 1967]]. However section 1(2) of that Act does not prevent the Sovereign from declaring assent in person if he or she so desires.
 
Royal assent is the final step required for a parliamentary bill to become law. Once a bill is presented to the Sovereign, he or she has the following formal options:
Line 25:
The last bill that was refused assent was the [[Scottish Militia Bill]] during [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Queen Anne's]] reign in 1708.<ref>''Lords' Journals'' ''(1705–1709),'' p. 506</ref>
 
[[Erskine May]]'s ''[[Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice|Parliamentary Practice]]'' advises "...and from that sanction they cannot be legally withheld", meaning that bills must be sent for royal assent, not that it must be given.<ref>{{cite book |date=1976 |editor-first=David |editor-last=Lidderdale |title=[[Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice|Erskine May's Treatise on The Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament]] |edition=19th |isbn=0-406-29102-0 |page=562|publisher=Butterworths }}, citing Hats. p. 339, 13 ''Lords' Journals'', p. 756</ref> However, some authorities have stated that the Sovereign no longer has the power to withhold assent from a bill ''against'' the advice of ministers.<ref>{{cite book |author-link=John Campbell, 1st Baron Campbell |first=John |last=Campbell |title=Lives of the Chancellors |volume=III |page=354}}</ref><ref>[[Gilbert Burnet]], ''A History of my Own Time'', vol. II (1734), p. 274.</ref>
 
Under modern constitutional conventions, the Sovereign generally acts on, and in accordance with, the advice of his or her ministers.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/SN03861.pdf | title=The Royal Prerogative | publisher=House of Commons Library | date=30 December 2009 | access-date=26 August 2014 | author1=Gay, Oonagh |author2=Maer, Lucinda}}</ref> However, there is some disagreement among scholars as to whether the monarch should withhold royal assent to a bill if advised to do so by his or her ministers.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/22/robert-craig-could-the-government-advise-the-queen-to-refuse-royal-assent-to-a-backbench-bill/ |title=Robert Craig: Could the Government Advise the Queen to Refuse Royal Assent to a Backbench Bill? |date=22 January 2019 |access-date=3 February 2019 |archive-date=3 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190203143536/https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/22/robert-craig-could-the-government-advise-the-queen-to-refuse-royal-assent-to-a-backbench-bill/ |url-status=live }}</ref>
Line 50:
Carafano suggests that William III considered the royal veto "his personal legislative tool".<ref name="carafano"/> By contrast, the last Stuart monarch, [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Anne]], withheld her assent from a bill just once. On 11 March 1708, she vetoed the [[Scottish Militia Bill]] on the advice of her ministers. No monarch has since withheld royal assent on a bill passed by Parliament.<ref>{{cite web|title=House of Lords Journal Volume 18: 11 March 1708|url=http://www.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol18/pp504-506#h3-0015/|website=www.british-history.ac.uk|access-date=30 April 2017|archive-date=10 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171210015954/http://www.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol18/pp504-506#h3-0015/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=parliament.uk FAQs|url=http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/parliamentary-archives/search-finding-aids-to-online-collections-/archives-faqs/records-frequently-asked-questions/#jump-link-6|website=www.parliament.uk|access-date=30 April 2017|archive-date=3 October 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171003052237/http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/parliamentary-archives/search-finding-aids-to-online-collections-/archives-faqs/records-frequently-asked-questions/#jump-link-6|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
During the rule of the succeeding [[House of Hanover|Hanoverian dynasty]], power was gradually exercised more by Parliament and the government. The first Hanoverian monarch, [[George I of Great Britain|George I]], became heir presumptive and then king late in life. Speaking English as a second language and being at first unfamiliar with British politics and customs, he relied on his ministers to a greater extent than had previous monarchs. Later Hanoverian monarchs attempted to restore royal control over legislation: [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]] and [[George IV of the United Kingdom|George IV]] both openly opposed [[Catholic Emancipation]]<ref>{{cite web |last=Conway |first=Stephen. |title=Book Review: George III: An Essay in Monarchy |url=http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/paper/conwayS2.html Book Review: George III: An Essay in Monarchy |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927210054/http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/paper/conwayS2.html |archivedate=27 September 2007 |publisher=The Institute of Historical Research |date=February 2003 |access-date=12 April 2007}}</ref><ref name=Giv>"[https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/george_iv_king.shtml George IV (1762–1830)] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191225203809/http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/historic_figures/george_iv_king.shtml |date=25 December 2019 }}". BBC History. Retrieved 12 April 2007.</ref> and asserted that to grant assent to a Catholic emancipation bill would violate the [[Coronation of the British monarch|Coronation Oath]], which required the sovereign to preserve and protect the established [[Church of England]] from papal domination, and would grant rights to individuals who were in league with a foreign power which did not recognise their legitimacy. However, George IV reluctantly granted his assent upon the advice of his ministers.<ref name=Giv /> Thus, as the concept of ministerial responsibility has evolved, the power to withhold royal assent has fallen into disuse, both in the United Kingdom and in the other Commonwealth realms.
 
In 1914, [[George V]] took legal advice on withholding royal assent from the [[Home Rule Act 1914|Government of Ireland Bill]]; then highly contentious legislation that the [[Liberal Party (UK)|Liberal]] government intended to push through Parliament by means of the [[Parliament Act 1911]]. He decided to not to withhold assent without "convincing evidence that it would avert a national disaster, or at least have a tranquillising effect on the distracting conditions of the time".<ref>{{cite book |title=Constitutional and Administrative Law |pages=243 |edition=13th |last1=Bradley |first1=A. W. |last2=Ewing |first2=K. D. |name-list-style=amp |year=2003 |publisher=Longmans |location=London |isbn=0-582-43807-1 }}</ref>
 
It has been mooted that, in modern times, the government could advise the monarch to withhold royal assent, but that elected politicians should strive to avoid such a scenario.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Craig|first=Robert|date=22 January 2019|title=Could the Government Advise the Queen to Refuse Royal Assent to a Backbench Bill?|url=https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/22/robert-craig-could-the-government-advise-the-queen-to-refuse-royal-assent-to-a-backbench-bill|access-date=12 March 2021|website=UK Constitutional Law Association|archive-date=3 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303095139/https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/22/robert-craig-could-the-government-advise-the-queen-to-refuse-royal-assent-to-a-backbench-bill/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Line 105:
===United Kingdom===
[[File:Reform Act 1832 First Page.jpg|thumb|Start of the parchment roll of the [[Reform Act 1832]], with the clerk's record of the royal assent of King [[William IV]] written above the bill, reading in full ''Le Roy le Veult. Soit baillé aux Seigneurs. A cette Bille avecque des amendemens les Seigneurs sont assentuz. A ces Amendemens les Communes sont assentuz.'']]
In the United Kingdom, a bill is presented for royal assent after it has passed all the required stages in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Under the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, the House of Commons may, under certain circumstances, direct that a bill be presented for assent despite lack of passage by the House of Lords.<ref>"Once a bill has completed all the parliamentary stages in both Houses, it is ready to receive royal assent", ''Bill becomes an Act of Parliament'' [http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/passage-bill/lords/lrds-royal-assent/] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131013202804/http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/passage-bill/lords/lrds-royal-assent/ |date=13 October 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/money-bills/|title=Money bills – Glossary page|website=UK Parliament|access-date=21 October 2013|archive-date=21 October 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131021205022/http://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/money-bills/|url-status=live}}</ref>
 
A list of all bills that have thus passed Parliament is drawn up by the [[Clerk of the Crown in Chancery]]; this list is then approved by the [[Clerk of the Parliaments]]. (The Prime Minister, other ministers, and Privy Counsellors do not normally have any involvement in drawing up the list.) The Clerk of the Crown then prepares [[letters patent]] listing all the relevant bills, which are then signed by the monarch.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Veiled Sceptre: Reserve Powers of Heads of State in Westminster Systems |first=Anne |last=Twomey |author-link=Anne Twomey (academic) |pages=627–628 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |isbn=9781107056787|date=12 April 2018 }}</ref>
Line 111:
Officially, assent is granted by the sovereign or by [[Lords Commissioners]] authorised to act by [[letters patent]]. Royal assent may be granted in parliament or outside parliament; in the latter case, each house must be separately notified before the bill takes effect.
 
The [[Clerk of the Parliaments]], anthe chief official of the House of Lords, traditionally statespronounces a formula in [[Anglo-Norman language|Anglo-Norman]] [[Law French]], indicating the sovereign's decision. The granting of royal assent to a [[supply bill]] is indicated with the words "Le Roy remercie ses bons sujets, accepte leur benevolence, et ainsi le veult",<ref name="bennion1981" /> translated as "The King thanks his good subjects, accepts their bounty, and so wills it." For other public or [[private bill]]s, the formula is simply "[[Le Roy le veult]]" ("the King wills it"). For [[Local and personal Acts of Parliament in the United Kingdom|personal bill]]s, the phrase is "Soit fait comme il est désiré" ("let it be done as it is desired"). The appropriate formula for withholding assent is the euphemistic "Le Roy s'avisera" ("the King will consider it").<ref>{{citation|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FVwEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA271 |title=The Assembled Commons; or, Parliamentary Biographer, with an abstract of the law of election and the usages of Parliament|author=A member of the Middle Temple|year=1838|publisher=Scott, Webster and Geary|location=London|page=271}}</ref>
 
When the sovereign is female, ''Le Roy'' is replaced by ''La Reyne''.
Line 129:
</ref>
 
Independently of the method used to signify royal assent, it is the responsibility of the [[Clerk of the Parliaments]], once the assent has been duly notified to both houses, not only to endorse the act in the name of the monarch with the formal Norman French formula, but to certify that assent has been granted.<ref>{{citation| url=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/Geo3/33/13| title=Acts of Parliament (Commencement) Act 1793| publisher=[[UK Statute Law Database]]| access-date=4 December 2014| archive-date=10 May 2019| archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190510203300/http://www.legislation.gov.uk/apgb/Geo3/33/13| url-status=live}}</ref> The Clerk signs one authentic copy of the bill and inserts the date (in English) on which the assent was notified to the two houses after the title of the act.<ref>[https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1967/mar/02/royal-assent-bill-hl#column_1191 Hansard] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231016033458/https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1967/mar/02/royal-assent-bill-hl#column_1191 |date=16 October 2023 }}, House of Lords, 2 March 1967, column 1191</ref>
 
=== Australia and New Zealand ===