Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App section source |
||
(38 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 2:
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2022}}
The [[United States Department of Justice]] defines '''school resource officers''' ('''SRO''') as "sworn law enforcement officers responsible for the safety and crime prevention in schools".<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2">{{Cite web |url=https://cops.usdoj.gov/supportingsafeschools |title=
SROs typically have additional duties, including mentoring and conducting presentations on youth-related issues. They are not school-based law enforcement officers, who are typically employed by a school district's law enforcement agency rather than local or city law enforcement, though the terms are often used interchangeably.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |title=A Brief History of School-Based Law Enforcement {{!}} Texas School Safety Center |url=https://txssc.txstate.edu/topics/law-enforcement/articles/brief-history |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160504233113/https://txssc.txstate.edu/topics/law-enforcement/articles/brief-history |archive-date=May 4, 2016 |access-date=2018-02-12 |website=txssc.txstate.edu}}</ref>
This article is primarily about SROs in the United States, secondarily in Canada.
==History==
=== United States ===
The first documented SRO was placed in a school in Flint, Michigan in 1953 as a community policing strategy. They strategized that placing police officers in school would improve the relationship between local police and youth. Flint, Michigan considered the program to be a success, and would become a model for future schools that would adopt the SRO program.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Sherling |first1=Kathy |title=History of School Resource Officer Program |url=http://blackfootpolice.org/sro/sro_history.html |work=Blackfoot Police |agency=National Association of School Resource Officers |date=1998}}</ref> Before the first documented SRO, the Los Angeles School Police Department formed their own adaptation of the program in 1948. It was developed to patrol and protect schools while neighborhoods began to desegregate. This is considered to be the first type of policing program in the United States.<ref name=:10>{{cite web |author1=The Center for Public Integrity |title=The history of school policing |url=https://publicintegrity.org/education/criminalizing-kids/the-history-of-school-policing/ |website=The Center for Public Integrity |date=September 8, 2021}}</ref>
After Flint, Michigan, municipalities across the nation implemented SRO programs with the goal of creating stronger community ties between police and the youth and to protect the safety of students. In 1966 The Chicago Police Department set a precedent for the new presence of policing in schools by establishing the first “Officer Friendly” program.<ref name=:10/> Their movement served as an example for several policing programs that would follow including D.A.R.E. (Drug Abuse Resistance Education) and G.R.E.A.T. (Gang Resistance Education and Training).<ref name=:10/> However, these programs did not launch until the 1980s and 1990s. Fresno, California also created a new standard for school policing in 1968 to promote community relationships between the public and law enforcement.<ref>{{cite web |author1=School Resources to Support Military-Connected Students |title=School Resource Officers: Rapid Review |url=https://schoolresources.militaryfamilies.psu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/schoolresources_socialjustice_sro.pdf |website=Pennsylvania State University |date=December 2020}}</ref>
The 1990s mark a period of substantial change to SRO programs in the United States. This change came about after the school shootings at Columbine High School in 1999 where 15 students were fatally shot by a fellow peer, and Jonesboro Middle School in 1998 where four students and one teacher were fatally shot by fellow peers as well. These troubling instances raised concern about school safety leading to the most attention SRO programs had received in country history. Between 1999 and 2005, the federal government awarded more than $750 million dollars to hire nearly 7,000 school resource officers across the country to tackle the new surge of school shootings.<ref name=:10/> Between 1997 and 2007, the number of SROs in schools rose by approximately 6,700.<ref>{{cite news |last1=James |first1=Nathan |last2=McCallion |first2=Gail |title=School Resource Officers: Law Enforcement Officers in Schools |url=https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R43126.pdf |work=Congressional Research Service |type=CRS Report for Congress |date=June 26, 2013}}</ref>
In more recent years, school shootings like Sandy Hook and the Parkland Massacre have continued to bring attention to the need for more safety in schools. This continued to incentivize the funding of SRO programs. In 2013, President Barack Obama announced a plan to prioritize federal grant application from law enforcement agencies that were looking to hire school resources officers.<ref name=:10/> The rise of school shootings is one of the most obvious reasons for the increasing presence of SROs in schools across the nation, but it is not the only one. In the 1980s and early 1990s, there was a rise in juvenile crime that also led to the expansion of the SRO program. In 1994 the Congress passed the Gun-Free Schools Act in fear of the juvenile and gang violence happening across the country. The passage of this act increased SRO presence as well.
===Canada===
Like the United States, many secondary schools in Canada have hired security personnel to enhance the safety of staff and students. Major cities such as [[Calgary]], [[Edmonton]], [[Regina, Saskatchewan|Regina]], [[Vancouver]] and [[Winnipeg]] maintain their SRO programs offered by their local city police, alongside small rural towns mainly in the provinces of [[Western Canada|West Canada]] with their programs offered by the [[Royal Canadian Mounted Police]] due to its rural nature.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Service |first=Calgary Police |title=School Resource Officers (SROs) |url=https://www.calgary.ca/cps/youth-programs-and-resources/school-resources/school-resource-officers.html |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=www.calgary.ca |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=School Resource Officers (SROs) |url=https://www.edmontonpolice.ca/CommunityPolicing/CommunityInitiatives/YouthSupportBranch/SchoolResourceOfficers |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=www.edmontonpolice.ca |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2012-08-21 |title=School Resource Program |url=https://www.reginapolice.ca/about-us/community-services/school-resource/ |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=Regina Police Service |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Canada |first=Public Safety |date=2018-12-21 |title=Crime Prevention Inventory |url=https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/nvntr/dtls-en.aspx?i=10152 |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=www.publicsafety.gc.ca}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=(none) |date=2006-03-31 |title=Operational priorities |url=https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/prior/index-eng.htm?wbdisable=true |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Canada |first=Public Safety |date=2018-12-21 |title=Crime Prevention Inventory |url=https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/cntrng-crm/crm-prvntn/nvntr/dtls-en.aspx?i=10132 |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=www.publicsafety.gc.ca}}</ref> The SRO program in Vancouver is styled as the School Liasion Officer (SLO) Program.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The need for SLOs in our schools |url=https://vpd.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/foi-slo-review-report-2020.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240811084415/https://vpd.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/foi-slo-review-report-2020.pdf |archive-date=11 August 2024 |website=Vancouver Police Department}}</ref>The City of [[Surrey, British Columbia|Surrey]] also maintains its own SRO program, however like small rural towns is offered by the RCMP as it is its primary law enforcement agency in the city.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Government of Canada |first=RCMP |date=2023-03-29 |title=Surrey RCMP - School Resource Officer Program |url=https://bc-cb.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/ViewPage.action?siteNodeId=2177&languageId=1&contentId=78988 |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=bc-cb.rcmp-grc.gc.ca}}</ref> This is set to change when the [[Surrey Police Service]] is fully implemented in November 2024, replacing the currently existing RCMP detachment in Surrey.
Like the United States, many secondary schools in Canada have hired security personnel to enhance the safety of staff and students. School systems, such as in [[Toronto]] and [[Vancouver]], have engaged armed police officers to be in the school throughout the day. In 2008, the [[Toronto District School Board]] (TDSB) and the [[Toronto Catholic District School Board]] (TCDSB), in collaboration with the [[Toronto Police Service]], implemented the SRO Program by permanently placing armed, uniformed police officers in secondary schools. However, in November 2017 the TDSB voted to eliminate the district's SRO program.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.tdsb.on.ca/News/Article-Details/ArtMID/474/ArticleID/1153/Trustees-Vote-to-End-School-Resource-Officer-Program-at-TDSB |title=Trustees Vote to End School Resource Officer Program at TDSB |website=Toronto District School Board |language=en-US |access-date=2018-03-05}}</ref> In April 2021, the [[Vancouver School Board]] also voted to end the program, effective June 2021.<ref>{{cite web |title=Vancouver School Board votes to cancel police liaison program |url=https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/vancouver-school-board-votes-to-cancel-school-liaison-officer-program-1.6002957 |website=CBC News |language=en-CA|access-date=2 November 2022}}</ref>▼
▲
The [[Ottawa Police Service]] and [[Peel Regional Police]]'s SRO programs were also terminated by their respective school board in 2021 and in 2020 amidst the [[George Floyd protests|anti-police movement]] in the United States and Canada. Edmonton and Vancouver also had their SRO programs similarly terminated, but were later brought back citing the importance of these officers for the safety of students.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Edmonton public bringing back school resource officers - Edmonton {{!}} Globalnews.ca |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/10461394/edmonton-public-school-resource-officers-police/ |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=Global News |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=‘A positive presence’: ABC Vancouver reinstating police in schools program {{!}} Globalnews.ca |url=https://globalnews.ca/news/9207853/school-liaison-officers-vancouver/ |access-date=2024-08-11 |website=Global News |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=1 September 2023 |title=School Liaison Officer Program |url=https://www.vsb.bc.ca/page/66725/school-liaison-officer-program |website=Vancouver School Board}}</ref>
== Purpose ==
Different governments, school districts, and professional agencies have varied descriptions for the purpose of SROs. The National Association for School Resource Officers details the SRO's role as threefold: 1) as an educator, 2) as an informal counselor or mentor and 3) as a law enforcement officer.<ref name=":2"
In addition, SROs' are managed by different institutions depending on their location. At school, most SROs are treated as staff and report to the principal or other school administrators. When not at school, they are often managed by a law enforcement agency.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Kiernan Coon |first1=Julie |last2=Travis III |first2=Lawrence |date=October 13, 2011 |title=The role of police in public schools: a comparison of principal and police reports of activities in schools |journal=Police Practice and Research |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=15–30 |doi=10.1080/15614263.2011.589570 |s2cid=143369843}}</ref>
Line 43 ⟶ 49:
=== Prominence ===
In the 2015–16 school year, the following percentages of schools in the U.S.A. reported having one or more SROs at their school at least once per week:<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017122.pdf |title=Crime, Violence, Discipline, and Safety in U.S. Public Schools}}</ref>
* 77% of schools with 1000 or more students
* 47% of schools with 500–999 students
Line 51 ⟶ 57:
=== Juvenile crime reduction ===
It is difficult to tell if the presence of SROs is having an impact on the prevalence of crime in schools and communities, likely because it is difficult to show a causal relationship between the presence of law enforcement and crime rates. For example, in a 2018 study that compared Kentucky high schools that hosted an SRO to Kentucky high schools that did not, there was no statistically significant relationship between reported criminal violation rates and the presence of an SRO.<ref>{{
A 2012 report from the National Association of School Resource Officers cites national statistics that show a general decrease in juvenile crime and the violent-crime index since the early 2000s, when SROs became especially prominent in schools.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web |title=The School Resource Officer and the Prevention of Violence in Schools|work=National Association of School Resource Officers|date=2012|first1=Maurice|last1=Canady|first2=Bernard |last2=James|first3=Janet|last3=Nease |url=https://nasro.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/NASRO-To-Protect-and-Educate-nosecurity.pdf |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150906121933/https://nasro.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/NASRO-To-Protect-and-Educate-nosecurity.pdf |archive-date=September 6, 2015}}</ref> They support this claim with a 2009 study that finds that "when the results were controlled for economic disadvantage, the presence of an SRO led to a 52.3% decrease in the arrest rate for assaults and a 72.9% decrease in arrests involving possession of a weapon on school property."<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Theriot |first=Matthew |year=2009 |title=School resource officers and the criminalization of student behavior |journal=Journal of Criminal Justice |volume=37 |issue=3 |pages=280–287 |doi=10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.04.008}}</ref> While this is true, having an SRO in the school also significantly increases the arrest rate for disorderly conduct, even when controlling for school poverty, a more subjective charge that relies considerably on the discretion of the arresting officer, as opposed to something like an assault or weapons charge that is much more objective. This result lends itself to the idea that the presence of an SRO may increase the criminalization of behaviors that could have been addressed in other ways. Further, the decrease in arrests for assault and weapon possession could be from a result of students avoiding the SROs and taking these activities off campus, not necessarily the result of them failing to commit these crimes at all. In another article, James Swift also refers to the report prepared by the Justice Policy Institute. His writing further indicates that the presence of school resource officers does not lead to a reduction in crime.<ref name="Justice URL" />
=== Teaching and mentorship ===
Line 59 ⟶ 65:
=== Financial costs ===
A 2011 report from the Justice Policy Institute considered the cost of SROs as compared to other full-time employees at secondary schools.<ref name=":5"
== Law and policy ==
Line 66 ⟶ 72:
Because SROs are responsible for a number of tasks outside of normal duties for law enforcement officials, it has become common practice to establish a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the school district and the local law enforcement agency. These MOUs tend to vary in content based on the needs of the school district, but common ideas include the specified mission of the SRO, the organizational structure, and the goals and procedures for the SRO. Other MOUs are more specific and include the day-to-day duties of the SRO, where the SRO would be located in the school building, how an SRO will be selected, who is responsible for training, and chain-of-command issues. The National Association of School Resource Officers provides helpful guidelines and questions that should be reflected in an MOU to ensure the safety of students and to guard against legal action that could be taken against the law enforcement agency and/or the school.<ref name=":4" />
MOUs often fall short
=== Federal policies ===
While the federal government does not have specific laws regarding the use of SROs, the U.S. Department of Education and Department of Justice created the Safe School-based Enforcement through Collaboration, Understanding, and Respect (SECURe) rubrics to help provide guidance to school districts.
Students can, however, file civil rights claims against School Resource Officers. Kerrin Wolf, an assistant professor of law at Stockton University, reviewed a series of Supreme Court decisions that have shaped the federal civil rights of students while in school. In her paper, she explores the ways in which students' rights are limited in three dimensions while in school: rights against search and seizure, interrogation rights, and free speech rights.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Wolf |first=Kerrin |date=2017-09-15 |title=Assessing Students' Civil Rights Claims against School Resource Officers |language=en|journal=Pace Law Review|publisher=Pace University School of Law |location=
* Search and Seizure: [[New Jersey v. T. L. O.|New Jersey v. T.L.O.]] loosened probable cause requirements for school officials in two ways: it required less evidence to justify a search and a school official can suspect a student of breaking a law or a school policy, which covers significantly more actions than just breaking a law. Vernonia School District v. Acton and Board of Education of Pottowatamie School District v. Earls further expanded schools' ability to search students by allowing for random drug testing for all students involved in extracurricular activities. However, [[Safford Unified School District#1 v. Redding]] placed some restrictions on schools by identifying strip searches as too intrusive. Courts remain divided regarding the question of whether school resource officers need probable cause or reasonable suspicion to conduct a search of a student on school grounds because they are agents of a law enforcement agency, not school officials.
* Interrogation: In State v. Barrett, the Louisiana court found that a [[Miranda warning]] was not required by a school official to question a student. As far as how this requirement extends to SROs, In the matter of V.P found that Miranda warnings are not required in an investigation involving an SRO if a school administrator performs the questioning. In re Marquita M. took it a step further by claiming that holding a student in a school office for questioning does not qualify as "in custody" (and, therefore, requires a Miranda warning) because it is not a threatening environment, like a police station, where coercion could occur.
Line 77 ⟶ 83:
=== State laws ===
Only eight U.S. states currently have laws on the books regarding School Resource Officers and/or police in schools.<ref>{{Cite web|author=American Institutes for Research|title=School Discipline Laws & Regulations by Category & State
==Controversies==
The legitimacy of school resource officers is a contentious and complex issue involving education, justice, and safety. Barbara Fedders, Associate Professor of Law at UNC and the Director of Clinical Programs and faculty supervisor of the Youth Justice Clinic, argues against the legitimacy of SROs with the following key points: school community policing policies become informed and prioritized based on the values and motivations of the SRO; SROs create a power imbalance and dominance within the school settings due to their presence; SROs' punitive nature and intimidation are not conducive to a learning environment; the presence of police in schools can undermine trust between students and educators and can erode feelings of safety; SROs authority has been known to impede the principal and teacher's responses to minor infractions, mischievous behavior, and inappropriate actions by students where SROs enforcement of the law escalates to legal consequences for children. <ref>{{Cite web |title=The End of School Policing |url=https://www.californialawreview.org/print/the-end-of-school-policing |access-date=2024-04-24 |website=California Law Review |language=en-US}}</ref> The criminalization of youth behavior before their prefrontal lobe development is problematic. Scholars argue that SROs police unfairly and disproportionately target black and brown students and those with disabilities.
Those arguing in favor of SROs talk about how they deter violence, drug use, criminal behavior, and disruption in schools, the SROs ability to respond to outside emergencies and threats, and the potential for SROs to minimize harm in an active shooter crisis.<ref>{{Cite journal |date=2023 |title=Perceptions of School Resource Officers: Protectors or Prosecutors*? |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/07340168221113352 |access-date=April 25, 2024 |journal=Criminal Justice Review|doi= 10.1177/07340168221113352|last1= Almanza|first1= Matthew|last2= Mason|first2= Makayla|last3= Melde|first3= Chris|volume= 48|issue= 3|pages= 318–338}}</ref> Strategic collaboration with school staff and SROs to improve school environments and increase safety awareness are additional key points by proponents. Positive relationships nurtured by SROs trained in cultural competency and diversity can provide mentorship and support to students and the school community.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Chrusciel |first1=Margaret M. |last2=Wolfe |first2=Scott |last3=Hansen |first3=J. Andrew |last4=Rojek |first4=Jeff J |last5=Kaminski |first5=Robert |date=2015-03-16 |title=Law enforcement executive and principal perspectives on school safety measures: School resource officers and armed school employees |url=https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PIJPSM-11-2014-0115/full/html |journal=Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management |language=en |volume=38 |issue=1 |pages=24–39 |doi=10.1108/PIJPSM-11-2014-0115 |issn=1363-951X}}</ref> Often SROs can be resources for civil duty and community engagement and many may teach subjects related to social studies, legal systems, and political sciences. There is also an argument that SROs helpfully enhance and legitimize the law enforcement agency's position in the local jurisdiction.
=== Police brutality ===
There have also been a number of incidents in the United States in which school resource officers and/or police officers called into schools are reported to have used excessive force against students. Some of those incidents include:
* In May 2017, an in-school police officer with the Dallas Independent School District (ISD) allegedly handcuffed and tasered a 7-year-old special needs student and, in that same week, another in-school officer at another Dallas ISD reportedly body-slammed and pepper sprayed a 12-year-old female student on campus.<ref>{{Cite news |first=E.A.|last=Crunden |work=[[ThinkProgress]]|date=May 18, 2017 |url=https://thinkprogress.org/dallas-police-schools-violence-kids-fd6cd565a8c0/ |title=Dallas school police tased a 7 year old, and then body slammed a 12 year old the next day |access-date=2018-02-14 |language=en-US}}</ref>
* In October 2015, a police officer was filmed body-slamming a 16-year-old girl at her desk in Spring Valley High School in South Carolina.<ref>{{Cite news|first1=Tim |last1=Stelloh|first2=Tracy |last2=Connor|date=October 27, 2015 |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/video-appears-show-cop-body-slamming-student-s-c-classroom-n451896 |title=Video Shows Cop Body-Slamming Female Student in S.C. Classroom |
* Also in October 2015, two police officers were called into Round Rock High School in Texas to break up a fight between students. Students filmed one of the officers choking one of the 14-year-old students involved in the fight.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://cbsaustin.com/news/local/incident-between-round-rock-pd-officer-and-student-caught-on-camera |title=Incident between Round Rock PD officers and student caught on camera |last=Uchida |first=Alex Boyér and Adela |
* A school resource officer for Tolman High School in Rhode Island fell under investigation in 2015 for body-slamming a 14-year-old student, leading to massive protests the following day over the SRO's behavior.<ref>{{Cite news|first=Lynn |last=Arditi|date=October 15, 2015 |url=
* In August 2015, the [[American Civil Liberties Union|ACLU]] filed a lawsuit against a Kentucky school for allowing a school resource officer to handcuff an 8-year-old boy and a 9-year-old girl, both of whom had special needs.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/04/us/aclu-sues-over-handcuffing-of-boy-8-and-girl-9-in-kentucky-school.html |title=A.C.L.U. Sues Over Handcuffing of Boy, 8, and Girl, 9, in Kentucky School |last=Stolberg |first=Sheryl Gay |date=2015-08-03 |work=The New York Times |access-date=2018-02-14 |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref>
These incidents are among many that have caused significant concern over the ability of schools to control the actions of school resource officers and other police officers when they are asked to intervene in student conflicts.{{Citation needed|date=March 2018}}
SRO's are not governed by the school board. They are controlled by the laws of the state in which they work and their agencies' policies and procedures. When the law is broken by a perpetrator and there is a victim of a crime, charges must be brought. It is not the choice of school staff whether a law enforcement officer can act in filing charges.
===Increasing arrests of juveniles===
Student Resource Officers are becoming more commonplace in American and Canadian schools, leading to increasing concerns that their presence in secondary schools could prematurely expose adolescents to the Criminal Justice System.<ref name=":5" /> School districts across the United States are implementing criminal justice system practices in order to achieve a safe schooling environment; however, this comes at the cost of exposing youth/adolescents to the criminal justice system and tarnishing their educational achievements for situations that in the past would likely have been handled through disciplinary action within the school.<ref name=":5" /> This is seen by some as contributing to a phenomenon commonly known as the [[school to prison pipeline]].<ref>
A criticism of school resource officer programs pertains to the rate of juvenile arrests. In a 2011 article by Amanda Petteruti issued by the Justice Policy Institute, information is presented that indicates that school referrals to the juvenile justice system have increased with the presence of SROs. A high percentage of those referrals were for minor offenses that may have been handled by the administration had an SRO not been present. This concern has attracted attention and some studies indicate that the use of the [[Juvenile justice system]] for minor offenses aids in a phenomenon known as the "[[School to prison pipeline]]"
The [[American Civil Liberties Union]] (ACLU) suggests that SRO programs should be designed to provide a different response for disciplinary matters as opposed to criminal offenses that occur on school grounds. This recommendation was intended to ensure that juveniles were not receiving disparate treatment based on the presence of a law enforcement officer within their school.<ref name="ACLU"/> This can be properly handled if there is a solid agreement or memorandum of understanding between the school and the police.
=== Effectiveness ===
The [[Stoneman Douglas High School shooting|February 14, 2018 shooting]] which killed 17 people at [[Stoneman Douglas High School]] brought renewed attention to the topic of police in schools. The police officer assigned to the school resigned shortly after the shooting under criticism of not entering the school building while the student was shooting.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/broward/parkland/florida-school-shooting/fl-florida-shooting-sro-20180222-story.html |title=Stoneman Douglas cop resigns; sheriff says he should have 'killed the killer' |last=Huriash |first=Stephen Hobbs, Scott Travis, Lisa J. |work=Sun-Sentinel |access-date=2018-03-02 |language=en-US}}</ref> Given the frequency with which [[School shooting|school shootings]] occur in the United States, critics of SRO programs are asking if it is necessary to have armed police officers in schools, if they cannot ensure students' safety during crises.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Blad |first1=Evie |title=Impact of School Police: Many Unanswered Questions |journal=Education Week |date=25 January 2017 |url=https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/01/25/impact-of-school-police-many-unanswered-questions.html |access-date=26 March 2018}}</ref> The commission report showed that the counselor and SRO both recommended Cruz, the shooter, be [[Baker Act|Baker Acted]] and the mental health service system did not follow through with their recommendation, so Cruz was allowed to purchase guns after turning 18.
The shooter in Maryland's [[Great Mills High School]] attack on March 20, 2018, was neutralized following swift action by the school's resource officer, Blaine Gaskill.<ref name=hassan>{{cite web |last1=Hassan |first1=Carma |last2=Ahmed |first2=Saeed |title=Lone resource officer's quick action stopped the Maryland school shooter within seconds |url=https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/20/us/maryland-school-shooting-resource-officer-response-trnd/index.html |publisher=CNN |date=March 21, 2018}}</ref> As CNN put it: "Gaskill's response was hailed as an example of exactly what a resource officer is supposed to do in such a circumstance, particularly when contrasted to the actions of the security officer in last month's shooting in Parkland, Florida."<ref name=hassan/> However in the DOJ's Report on the response to the mass shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas, where 19 children and two teachers lost their lives on May 24, 2022, an examination and timeline of the responses by the SRO and law enforcement were determined to be inadequate and ultimately called a failure based on national standards, expectations, and acceptable practices. The comprehensive review consisted of interviews, extensive location study, and collecting and combing through over 14,000 individual data items related to the incident. <ref>{{
The discussion surrounding school resource officers encompasses diverse perspectives and considerations, reflecting ongoing debates regarding their role, effectiveness, and potential impact on school environments, safety measures, and relationships within their communities. Examining the impact of SROs on school climate, student perceptions of safety, sense of belonging, and trust in authority figures considering both positive and negative effects will progress the conversation.
==Further reading==▼
*[https://www.is.fi/oulun-seutu/art-2000006672829.html Oululainen koulupoliisi: Oppilaiden välinen väkivalta on muuttunut aiempaa vakavammaksi – ”Myös puheet ovat raaistuneet”], -Ilta Sanumat (Finnish language)▼
==References==
{{reflist| colwidth=30em | refs=
<!-- <ref name="IFPO Article URL">{{cite web |url=https://www.ifpo.org/resource-links/articles-and-reports/school-security-training/school-resource-security-officers/ |title=School Resource Security Officers: School Protection Officers for Public Schools |author=McNicholas, C. |year=2013}}</ref> -->
<ref name="Justice URL">{{cite web |url=http://jjie.org/school-resource-officers-topic-of-hot-debate-even-prior-sandy-hook/102868 |title=School Resource Officer: A Topic of Hot Debate, Even Prior to Sandy Hook |author=Swift,
<ref name="
<ref name="Thesis">{{cite
<ref name="ACLU">{{cite
}}
Line 125 ⟶ 133:
http://www.schoolsecurity.org/resources/nasro_survey_2004.html}}
-->
▲==Further reading==
▲*[https://www.is.fi/oulun-seutu/art-2000006672829.html Oululainen koulupoliisi: Oppilaiden välinen väkivalta on muuttunut aiempaa vakavammaksi – ”Myös puheet ovat raaistuneet”],
==External links==
|