Sibling: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Formal tone
 
(82 intermediate revisions by 54 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|One of two or more individuals having at least one parent in common}}
{{Close relationships|types}}
{{redirect|Siblings|the television series|Siblings (TV series)|other uses}}
<!--No adding photos to show off your wonderful children, sorry-->
A '''sibling''' is a relative that shares at least one [[parent]] with the subjectother person. A [[male]] sibling is a [[brother]], and a [[female]] sibling is a [[sister]]. A person with no siblings is an [[only child]].
 
[[File:Me and my other brother.jpg|thumb|A [[sister]] (female sibling) carrying her [[brother]] (male sibling).]]
While some circumstances can cause siblings to be raised separately (such as [[foster care]]) most societies have siblings grow up together. This causes the development of strong [[human bonding|emotional bonds]], with siblinghood considered a unique type of relationship unto itself. The emotional bond between siblings is often complicated and is influenced by factors such as parental treatment, [[birth order]], [[Personality psychology|personality]], and personal experiences outside the family.<ref name="psychtoday">{{cite magazine |author=Mersky Leder, Jane |url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19930101-000023.html |title=Adult Sibling Rivalry |magazine=Psychology Today |date=Jan–Feb 1993 |access-date=November 28, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20121211220721/http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19930101-000023.html |archive-date=December 11, 2012 }}</ref>
 
While some circumstances can cause siblings to be raised separately (such as [[foster care]]), most societies have siblings grow up together. This causes the development of strong [[human bonding|emotional bonds]], with siblinghood considered a unique type of relationship unto itself. The emotional bond between siblings is often complicated and is influenced by factors such as parental treatment, [[birth order]], [[Personality psychology|personality]], and personal experiences outside the family.<ref name="psychtoday">{{cite magazine |author=Mersky Leder, Jane |url=http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19930101-000023.html |title=Adult Sibling Rivalry |magazine=Psychology Today |date=Jan–Feb 1993 |access-date=November 28, 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://archive.today/20121211220721/http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/pto-19930101-000023.html |archive-date=December 11, 2012 }}</ref>
Medically, a full sibling is a [[first-degree relative]] and a half sibling is a [[second-degree relative]] as they are related by 50% and 25% respectively.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bcbst.com/mpmanual/First_and_Second_Degree_Relative.htm |title=First, Second and Third Degree Relative |website= www.bcbst.com |publisher=BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.uab.edu/humanresources/home/images/M_images/Relations/PDFS/FAMILY%20MEMBER%20CHART.pdf |title=CONSANGUINITY / AFFINITY CHART |website=[[University of Alabama at Birmingham]]}}</ref>
 
Medically, a full -sibling is a [[first-degree relative]] and a half -sibling is a [[second-degree relative]] as they are related by 50% and 25%, respectively.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.bcbst.com/mpmanual/First_and_Second_Degree_Relative.htm |title=First, Second and Third Degree Relative |website= www.bcbst.com |publisher=BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.uab.edu/humanresources/home/images/M_images/Relations/PDFS/FAMILY%20MEMBER%20CHART.pdf |title=CONSANGUINITY / AFFINITY CHART |website=[[University of Alabama at Birmingham]]}}</ref>
 
==Definitions==
{{more citations needed section|date=April 2023}}
{| class="wikitable floatright" style="font-size: 94%;"
[[File:Haitian brothers.jpg|thumb|Two brothers from [[Haiti]].]]
! Siblings and half siblings
 
The word ''sibling'' was reintroduced in 1903 in an article in ''[[Biometrika]]'', as a translation for the German ''Geschwister'', having not been used since Middle English, specifically 1425.<ref>{{cite journal|year=1903|first1=Karl|last1=Pearson|author-link=Karl Pearson|first2=Alice|last2=Lee|author-link2=Alice Lee (mathematician)|journal=Biometrika|title=On the laws of inheritance in man|volume=2|issue=4|page=369|doi=10.2307/2331507|jstor=2331507|url=https://archive.org/details/blumenzeitung13hssl/page/369|quote=These [calculations] will enable us... to predict the probable character in any individual from a knowledge of one or more parents or brethren (“siblings,” = brothers or sisters).}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/wang_elizabeth_g_200912_ma.pdf|title=Gone But Not Forgotten: Persistence and Revival in the History of English Word Loss|author=Elizabeth Grace Wang|pagepages=35–36|quote=The primary word under consideration in this chapter is sibling, which during the Old English period referred simply to a relation, not necessarily to a brother or sister, as in the modern use of the term. The last recorded use in the Oxford English Dictionary in the relative sense is in 1425. There are no records at all of the word for the next 500 years, although its derivational base sib remained in use throughout those years. It was in fact the term sib which, when employed specifically in the fields of anthropology and genetics, gave rise to the readoption of sibling. Sibling, in the narrower modern sense of describing the relationship between two people sharing a common parent, filled a semantic gap in the English lexicon, as there previously was no term to describe the fraternal relationship that did not specify gender. It is clear from early uses of sibling in the 20th century that the writer did not expect the reader to be familiar with the word, as the translator’s note from a German eugenics book, Human Heredity explains, ‘The word “sib” or “sibling” is coming into use in genetics in the English-speaking world, as an equivalent of the convenient German term “Geschwister” and as a general name for all children born of the same parents, that is to say, to denote brothers and sisters without distinction of sex.’ (Baur 1931: 508 in sibling, OED). Likewise, an article in the journal Biometrika from 1903 contains the clarification, ‘“siblings”=brothers or sisters,’ when employing the term. Thus we observe an interesting phenomenon of a native English word being reintroduced to native English speakers, who clearly have no knowledge of it.}}</ref>
 
{{anchor|Full}}Siblings or '''full -siblings''' ([''full''] ''sisters'' or ''brothers'') share the same biological parents. Full -siblings are also the most common type of siblings.{{Citation needed|date=June 2020}} [[Twin]]s are siblings that are born atfrom the same timepregnancy.<ref>{{Citation needed|datetitle=Junetwin 2020|url=https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/twin |work=The Free Dictionary |access-date=2023-06-22}}</ref> Often, twins with a close relationship will develop a [[twin language]] from infanthood, a language only shared and understood between the two. Studies suggestcorroborate that identical twins appear to display more twin talk than fraternal twins. At about 3 years of age, twin talk usually ends.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hayashi|first1=C|last2=Mikami|first2=H|last3=Nishihara|first3=R|last4=Maeda|first4=C|last5=Hayakawa|first5=K|title=The relationship between twin language, twins' close ties, and social competence|journal=Twin Research and Human Genetics |date=2014|volume=17|issue=1|pages=27–37|doi=10.1017/thg.2013.83|pmid=24330841|s2cid=31514697|urldoi-access=https://semanticscholar.org/paper/f47019eca63e14d7e3826fab745777932ef06b4efree}}</ref> Twins generally share a greater bond due to growing up together and being the same age.
 
{{anchor|Half}}'''Half-siblings''' ('''half-sisters''' or '''half-brothers''') are people who share one parent. They may share the same mother but different fathers (in which case they are known as ''uterine'' siblings or ''maternal half-siblings''), or they may have the same father but different mothers (in which case, they are known as ''agnate'' siblings or ''paternal half-siblings''. In law, the term ''[[Consanguinity|consanguine]]'' is used in place of agnate).{{citation needed|date=June 2020}} In law (and especially [[inheritance]] law), half-siblings have often been accorded treatment unequal to that of full -siblings. Old English [[common law]] at one time incorporated inequalities into the laws of [[Intestacy|intestate succession]], with half-siblings taking only half as much property of their intestate siblings' estates as siblings of full-blood. Unequal treatment of this type has been wholly abolished in [[England]],<ref>{{Cite web|title = Marriage: legitimacy and adoption|url = http://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/private-lives/relationships/overview/legitimacyadoption/|website = UK Parliament|access-date = 2015-08-03}}</ref> but still exists in the U.S. state of Florida.<ref>Fla. Stat. s. 732.105.</ref>
{{anchor|Three-quarter}}'''Three-quarter siblings''' share one parent, while the unshared parents are [[first-degree relativerelatives]]s to each other, for example, if a man has children with two women who are sisters, or a woman has children with a man and his son. In the first case, the children are half-siblings as well as first cousins; in the second, the children are half-siblings as well as an avuncular pair. They are genetically closer than half -siblings but less genetically close than full -siblings,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Graffelman|first1=Jan|last2=Galván Femenía|first2=Iván|last3=de Cid|first3=Rafael|last4=Barceló Vidal|first4=Carles|date=2019|title=A Log-Ratio Biplot Approach for Exploring Genetic Relatedness Based on Identity by State|journal=Frontiers in Genetics|language=English|volume=10|page=341|doi=10.3389/fgene.2019.00341|pmid=31068965|pmc=6491861|issn=1664-8021|doi-access=free}}</ref> a degree of genetic relationship that is rare in humans and little-studied.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Galván-Femenía|first1=Iván|last2=Barceló-Vidal|first2=Carles|last3=Sumoy|first3=Lauro|last4=Moreno|first4=Victor|last5=de Cid|first5=Rafael|last6=Graffelman|first6=Jan|date=15 January 2021|title=A likelihood ratio approach for identifying three-quarter siblings in genetic databases|journal=Heredity|language=en|volume=126|issue=3|pages=537–547|doi=10.1038/s41437-020-00392-8|pmid=33452467|pmc=8027836|issn=1365-2540|doi-access=free}}</ref>
 
[[Dibling]]s, a portmanteau of donor sibling, or donor-conceived sibling, or donor-sperm sibling, are biologically connected through [[Egg donation|donated eggs]] or [[Sperm donation|sperm]].<ref name="guardian-jolly">{{cite news|first1=Alice|last1=Jolly|access-date=2019-08-02|title=Donor siblings: do the ties of blood matter?|url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/jan/21/donor-siblings-do-ties-of-blood-matter|newspaper=The Guardian|date=21 January 2017|issn=0261-3077|via=www.theguardian.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|access-date=2019-08-02|title=What It's Like To... Find Out You Have 40 Brothers and Sisters|url=http://vanmag.com/city/what-its-like-to-find-out-you-have-40-brothers-and-sisters/|date=12 April 2019|website=Vancouver Magazine|archive-date=2019-08-02|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190802024856/http://vanmag.com/city/what-its-like-to-find-out-you-have-40-brothers-and-sisters/|url-status=dead}}</ref> Diblings are biologically siblings though not legally for the purposes of family rights and inheritance. The anonymity of donation is seen to add complication to the process of courtship.
 
===Non -blood relations{{anchor|step}}===<!--This section is linked from [[Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti]]-->
Related through affinity:
* '''[[Stepsibling]]s''' (stepbrothers or stepsisters) are the children of one's [[Stepfamily|stepparent]] from a previous relationship.
* '''Adoptive siblings''' are raised by a person who is the [[adoption|adoptive]] parent of one and the adoptive or biological parent of the other.
* '''[[Sibling-in-law|Siblings-in-law]]''' are the siblings of one's spouse, the spouse of one's sibling, or the spouse of one's spouse's sibling.<ref>{{Cite web|title=brother-in-law|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/brother-in-law|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=sister-in-law|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sister-in-law|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en}}</ref> The spouse of one's spouse's sibling may also be called a '''co-sibling'''.<ref>{{Cite web|title=co-brother|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/co-brother|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=co-sister|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/co-sister|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en}}</ref>
 
Not related:
* '''{{vanchor|Foster}} siblings''' are children who are raised in the same [[foster home]]: foster children of one's parent(s), or the children or foster children of one's foster parent.<ref>{{Cite web|title=foster brother|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english-danish/foster-brother|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Foster sister definition and meaning {{!}} Collins English Dictionary|url=https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/foster-sister|access-date=2021-03-10|website=www.collinsdictionary.com|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=June 2019|title=Sibling Issues in Foster Care and Adoption|url=https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/siblingissues.pdf|url-status=live|website=Child Welfare Information Gateway|publisher=U.S. Department of Health and Human Services}}</ref>
* '''God siblings''' are the children of the [[godparent|godfather or godmother]] or the godchildren of the father or mother.{{citation needed|date=June 2020}}
* '''{{anchor|Milk}}Milk siblings''' are children who have been [[Breastfeeding|nursed]] by the same woman. This relationship exists in cultures with [[milk kinship]] and in [[Islamic law]].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Pelegrino |first=Elton N. |date=2022-01-20 |title=Milk Kinship: What do Islam have to say about this? |url=https://www.nnc.gov.ph//regional-offices/mindanao/region-ix-zamboanga-peninsula/6901-milk-kinship-what-do-islam-have-to-say-about-this |access-date=2023-06-22 |website=www.nnc.gov.ph |language=en-gb}}</ref>
* '''Cross-siblings''' are individuals who share one or more half-siblings; if one person has at least one maternal half-sibling and at least one paternal half-sibling, the maternal and paternal half-siblings are cross-siblings to each other.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/dec/28/shes-my-sister-from-another-mister-cross-siblings|title=She's my sister from another mister! {{!}} Janelle Butterfield|last=Butterfield|first=Janelle|date=2013-12-28|website=the Guardian|language=en|access-date=2018-10-29}}</ref>{{Dubious |Cross siblings?|date=June 2020}}
{| class="wikitable floatleft" style="font-size: 94%; width: 49%;"
! Siblings and half -siblings
|-
|style="border: none;" |
Line 19 ⟶ 44:
{{chart/end}}
|-
|style="font-size:94%; border: none; line-height: 1.4em; max-width: 100px;" |Bryan and Betty are full siblings while Cyrus is their half brother; their relation percentage of consanguinity is 50%.
|}
{| class="wikitable floatright" style="font-size: 94%; width: 49%;"
[[File:Haitian brothers.jpg|thumb|Two brothers from [[Haiti]].]]
! Siblings, half -siblings, and three-quarter siblings
 
The word ''sibling'' was reintroduced in 1903 in an article in ''[[Biometrika]]'', as a translation for the German ''Geschwister'', having not been used since 1425.<ref>{{cite journal|year=1903|first1=Karl|last1=Pearson|author-link=Karl Pearson|first2=Alice|last2=Lee|author-link2=Alice Lee (mathematician)|journal=Biometrika|title=On the laws of inheritance in man|volume=2|issue=4|page=369|doi=10.2307/2331507|jstor=2331507|url=https://archive.org/details/blumenzeitung13hssl/page/369|quote=These [calculations] will enable us... to predict the probable character in any individual from a knowledge of one or more parents or brethren (“siblings,” = brothers or sisters).}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://getd.libs.uga.edu/pdfs/wang_elizabeth_g_200912_ma.pdf|title=Gone But Not Forgotten: Persistence and Revival in the History of English Word Loss|author=Elizabeth Grace Wang|page=35–36|quote=The primary word under consideration in this chapter is sibling, which during the Old English period referred simply to a relation, not necessarily to a brother or sister, as in the modern use of the term. The last recorded use in the Oxford English Dictionary in the relative sense is in 1425. There are no records at all of the word for the next 500 years, although its derivational base sib remained in use throughout those years. It was in fact the term sib which, when employed specifically in the fields of anthropology and genetics, gave rise to the readoption of sibling. Sibling, in the narrower modern sense of describing the relationship between two people sharing a common parent, filled a semantic gap in the English lexicon, as there previously was no term to describe the fraternal relationship that did not specify gender. It is clear from early uses of sibling in the 20th century that the writer did not expect the reader to be familiar with the word, as the translator’s note from a German eugenics book, Human Heredity explains, ‘The word “sib” or “sibling” is coming into use in genetics in the English-speaking world, as an equivalent of the convenient German term “Geschwister” and as a general name for all children born of the same parents, that is to say, to denote brothers and sisters without distinction of sex.’ (Baur 1931: 508 in sibling, OED). Likewise, an article in the journal Biometrika from 1903 contains the clarification, ‘“siblings”=brothers or sisters,’ when employing the term. Thus we observe an interesting phenomenon of a native English word being reintroduced to native English speakers, who clearly have no knowledge of it.}}</ref>
 
{{anchor|Full}}Siblings or '''full siblings''' ([''full''] ''sisters'' or ''brothers'') share the same biological parents. Full siblings are also the most common type of siblings.{{Citation needed|date=June 2020}} [[Twin]]s are siblings that are born at the same time.{{Citation needed|date=June 2020}} Often, twins with a close relationship will develop a [[twin language]] from infanthood, a language only shared and understood between the two. Studies suggest that identical twins appear to display more twin talk than fraternal twins. At about 3 years of age, twin talk usually ends.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Hayashi|first1=C|last2=Mikami|first2=H|last3=Nishihara|first3=R|last4=Maeda|first4=C|last5=Hayakawa|first5=K|title=The relationship between twin language, twins' close ties, and social competence|journal=Twin Research and Human Genetics |date=2014|volume=17|issue=1|pages=27–37|doi=10.1017/thg.2013.83|pmid=24330841|s2cid=31514697|url=https://semanticscholar.org/paper/f47019eca63e14d7e3826fab745777932ef06b4e}}</ref> Twins generally share a greater bond due to growing up together and being the same age.
 
{{anchor|Half}}'''Half-siblings''' ('''half-sisters''' or '''half-brothers''') are people who share one parent. They may share the same mother but different fathers (in which case they are known as ''uterine'' siblings or ''maternal half-siblings''), or they may have the same father but different mothers (in which case, they are known as ''agnate'' siblings or ''paternal half-siblings''. In law, the term ''[[Consanguinity|consanguine]]'' is used in place of agnate).{{citation needed|date=June 2020}} In law (and especially [[inheritance]] law), half-siblings have often been accorded treatment unequal to that of full siblings. Old English [[common law]] at one time incorporated inequalities into the laws of [[Intestacy|intestate succession]], with half-siblings taking only half as much property of their intestate siblings' estates as siblings of full-blood. Unequal treatment of this type has been wholly abolished in [[England]],<ref>{{Cite web|title = Marriage: legitimacy and adoption|url = http://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/transformingsociety/private-lives/relationships/overview/legitimacyadoption/|website = UK Parliament|access-date = 2015-08-03}}</ref> but still exists in the U.S. state of Florida.<ref>Fla. Stat. s. 732.105.</ref>
{| class="wikitable floatright" style="font-size: 94%;"
! Siblings, half siblings, and three-quarter siblings
|-
|style="border: none;" |
Line 40 ⟶ 58:
{{Tree chart/end}}
|-
|style="font-size:94%; border: none; line-height: 1.4em; max-width: 100px;" |Donna and David are full siblings; .<br>Emily is their three-quarter sibling and Frank's half sister.
|}
{| class="wikitable floatright" style="font-size: 94%; width: 100%;"
{{anchor|Three-quarter}}'''Three-quarter siblings''' share one parent, while the unshared parents are [[first-degree relative]]s to each other, for example if a man has children with two women who are sisters, or a woman has children with a man and his son. In the first case, the children are half-siblings as well as first cousins; in the second, the children are half-siblings as well as an avuncular pair. They are genetically closer than half siblings but less genetically close than full siblings,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Graffelman|first1=Jan|last2=Galván Femenía|first2=Iván|last3=de Cid|first3=Rafael|last4=Barceló Vidal|first4=Carles|date=2019|title=A Log-Ratio Biplot Approach for Exploring Genetic Relatedness Based on Identity by State|journal=Frontiers in Genetics|language=English|volume=10|page=341|doi=10.3389/fgene.2019.00341|pmid=31068965|pmc=6491861|issn=1664-8021|doi-access=free}}</ref> a degree of genetic relationship that is rare in humans and little-studied.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Galván-Femenía|first1=Iván|last2=Barceló-Vidal|first2=Carles|last3=Sumoy|first3=Lauro|last4=Moreno|first4=Victor|last5=de Cid|first5=Rafael|last6=Graffelman|first6=Jan|date=15 January 2021|title=A likelihood ratio approach for identifying three-quarter siblings in genetic databases|journal=Heredity|language=en|volume=126|issue=3|pages=537–547|doi=10.1038/s41437-020-00392-8|pmid=33452467|pmc=8027836|issn=1365-2540|doi-access=free}}</ref>
! Siblings, half siblings, three-quarter siblings, and cross siblings
|-
|style="border: none;" |
{{Tree chart/start|align=center|style=border: 1px solid #c8ccd1; background-color: #fff; padding: 5px;}}
{{Tree chart|MAN|y|~|~|~|~|~|~|MOM|y|DAD|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|~|y|WOM| |MOM=Abiga|DAD=Abal|MAN=Egres|WOM=Belina}}
{{Tree chart| |,|-|^|-|.| | | | | | | |)|-|-|-|v|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|.| | | |!| | | | | }}
{{Tree chart|HDAU1| |HSON1|y|WOM2|y|SON| |DAU1|y|MAN2|y|DAU2| |HSON2|y|WOM3|SON=Abram|SON2=Aje|DAU1=Aserna|DAU2=Agnia|HDAU1=Erika|HSON1=Efram|HSON2=Bein|WOM2=Venia|MAN2=Zak|WOM3=Magnolea}}
{{Tree chart| | | | | | | |!| | | |!| | | | | | | |!| | | |!| | | | | | | |!| }}
{{Tree chart| | | | | | |GSON1| |GSON2| | | | | |GDAU1| |GDAU2| | | | | |GSON3|GSON1=Jrake|GSON2=Jaden|GDAU1=Julia|GDAU2=Janine|GSON3=Jakob}}
{{Tree chart/end}}
|-
|style="font-size:94%; border: none; line-height: 1.4em; max-width: 100px;" |Erika and Efram are full siblings; to them, Abram, Aserna, and Agnia are their half-siblings, and Bein is their cross sibling.<br>Julia and Janine were born to one father and two full-sibling mothers, and are thus three-quarter siblings. Jaden is their cousin, while Jrake and Jakob are their half-cousins.<br>Jrake and Jaden were born to one mother and two half-sibling fathers, and are thus three-quarter siblings, however, their actual percentage of genetic relation is 31.25% instead of 37.5%. Jrake and Jakob are cross-cousins.
|}
{{-}}
 
==Consanguinity and genetics==
[[Dibling]]s, a portmanteau of donor sibling, or donor-conceived sibling, or donor-sperm sibling, are biologically connected through [[Egg donation|donated eggs]] or [[Sperm donation|sperm]].<ref name="guardian-jolly">{{cite news|first1=Alice|last1=Jolly|access-date=2019-08-02|title=Donor siblings: do the ties of blood matter?|url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2017/jan/21/donor-siblings-do-ties-of-blood-matter|newspaper=The Guardian|date=21 January 2017|issn=0261-3077|via=www.theguardian.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|access-date=2019-08-02|title=What It's Like To... Find Out You Have 40 Brothers and Sisters|url=http://vanmag.com/city/what-its-like-to-find-out-you-have-40-brothers-and-sisters/|date=12 April 2019|website=Vancouver Magazine}}</ref> Diblings are biologically siblings though not legally for the purposes of family rights and inheritance. The anonymity of donation is seen to add complication to the process of courtship.
[[Consanguinity]] is the measure of how closely people are related.<ref>{{Cite web|last=nivens|date=2015-01-09|title=Consanguinity|url=https://adoption.umn.edu/consanguinity|access-date=2021-03-02|website=Adoption Medicine Clinic – University of Minnesota|language=en|archive-date=2021-03-05|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210305135928/https://adoption.umn.edu/consanguinity|url-status=dead}}</ref> Genetic relatedness measures how many genes a person shares. As all humans share over 99% of the same genes, consanguinity only matters for the small fraction of genes which vary between different personspeople.<ref name="UnderstandingAsk geneticsa Geneticist 2006">{{cite web|last=Dr. Shafer |first=Aaron|title=Understanding genetics|url=httphttps://geneticswww.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/articles/2006/ask166/ |title=How are siblings 50% genetically identical while humans and mice are 85% identical? |website=[[The Tech Interactive]] |publisherseries=StanfordAsk a Geneticist |date=17 March 2006 University|access-date=135 DecemberAugust 20132024}}</ref> Inheritance of genes has a random element to it,<ref name="UnderstandingAsk geneticsa Geneticist 2006"/> and these two concepts are different.<ref name="WhyAsk halfa siblingsGeneticist share 25% of their DNA - Understanding2013">{{cite web |last=Dr.Starr Starr|first=D. Barry|title=Why half siblings share 25% of their DNA – Understanding|url=httphttps://geneticswww.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/why-siblings-share-around-fifty-percent-their-dna/ |title=Why do half-siblings share 25% of their genes? |website=[[The Tech Interactive]] |publisherseries=StanfordAsk a Geneticist |date=5 September 2013 University|access-date=195 JuneAugust 20142024}}</ref> Consanguinity decreases by half for every generation of reproductive separation through their most recent common ancestor. Siblings are 50% related by consanguinity as they are separated from each other by two generation (sibling to parent to sibling), and they share two parents as common ancestors (<math>\left ( \tfrac{1}{2} \right )^2 + \left ( \tfrac{1}{2} \right )^2</math>).
 
A fraternal twin is a sibling and, therefore, is related by 50% consanguinity.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Coefficient of relationship – ISOGG Wiki|url=https://isogg.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_relationship|access-date=2021-03-02|website=isogg.org}}</ref> [[Fraternal twins]] are no more genetically similar than regular siblings. As [[identical twin]]s come from the same zygote, their most recent common ancestor is each other. They areThey’re genetically identical and 100% consanguineous as they arethey’re separated by zero generations (<math>\left ( \tfrac{1}{2} \right )^0</math>).<ref name="UnderstandingAsk a Geneticist genetics2006"/> [[Twin study|Twin studies]] have been conducted by scientists to examine the roles that [[Nature versus nurture|genetics and environment]] play in the development of various traits. Such studies examine how often identical twins possess the same behavioral trait and compare it to how often fraternal twins possess the same trait.{{citation needed|date=June 2020}} In other studies twins are raised in separate families, and studies compare the passing on of a behavioral trait by the family environment and the possession of a common trait between identical twins. This kind of study has revealed that for personality traits which are known to be [[Heritability|heritable]], genetics play a substantial role throughout life and an even larger role during early years.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Plomin|first1=R|last2=Pederson|first2=N.L.|last3=McClearn|first3=G.E.|last4=Nesselroade|first4=J.R.|last5=Bergeman|first5=C.S.|title=EAS temperaments during the last half of the life span: Twins reared apart and twins reared together|journal=Psychology and Aging|date=1988|volume=3|issue=1|pages=43–50|doi=10.1037/0882-7974.3.1.43|pmid=3268242}}</ref>
===Non blood relations{{anchor|step}}===<!--This section is linked from [[Barzan Ibrahim al-Tikriti]]-->
Related through affinity:
* '''[[Stepsibling]]s''' (stepbrothers or stepsisters) are the children of one's [[Stepfamily|stepparent]] from a previous relationship.
* '''Adoptive siblings''' are raised by a person who is the [[adoption|adoptive]] parent of one and the adoptive or biological parent of the other.
* '''[[Sibling-in-law|Siblings-in-law]]''' are the siblings of one's spouse, the spouse of one's sibling, or the spouse of one's spouse's sibling.<ref>{{Cite web|title=brother-in-law|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/brother-in-law|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=sister-in-law|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/sister-in-law|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en}}</ref> The spouse of one's spouse's sibling may also be called a '''co-sibling'''.<ref>{{Cite web|title=co-brother|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/co-brother|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=co-sister|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/co-sister|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en}}</ref>
 
Half-siblings are 25% related by consanguinity as they share one parent and separated from each other by two generations (<math>\left ( \tfrac{1}{2} \right )^2</math>).
Not related:
* '''{{vanchor|Foster}} siblings''' are children who are raised in the same [[foster home]]: foster children of one's parent(s), or the children or foster children of one's foster parent.<ref>{{Cite web|title=foster brother|url=https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english-danish/foster-brother|access-date=2021-03-10|website=dictionary.cambridge.org|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Foster sister definition and meaning {{!}} Collins English Dictionary|url=https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/foster-sister|access-date=2021-03-10|website=www.collinsdictionary.com|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|date=June 2019|title=Sibling Issues in Foster Care and Adoption|url=https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubPDFs/siblingissues.pdf|url-status=live|website=Child Welfare Information Gateway|publisher=U.S. Department of Health and Human Services}}</ref>
* '''God siblings''' are the children of the [[godparent|godfather or godmother]] or the godchildren of the father or mother.{{citation needed|date=June 2020}}
* '''{{anchor|Milk}}Milk siblings''' are children who have been [[Breastfeeding|nursed]] by the same woman. This relationship exists in cultures with [[milk kinship]] and in [[Islamic law]].{{citation needed|date=June 2020}}
* '''Cross-siblings''' are individuals who share one or more half-siblings; if one person has at least one maternal half-sibling and at least one paternal half-sibling, the maternal and paternal half-siblings are cross-siblings to each other.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/dec/28/shes-my-sister-from-another-mister-cross-siblings|title=She's my sister from another mister! {{!}} Janelle Butterfield|last=Butterfield|first=Janelle|date=2013-12-28|website=the Guardian|language=en|access-date=2018-10-29}}</ref>{{Dubious |Cross siblings?|date=June 2020}}
 
==Consanguinity and genetics==
[[Consanguinity]] is the measure of how closely people are related.<ref>{{Cite web|last=nivens|date=2015-01-09|title=Consanguinity|url=https://adoption.umn.edu/consanguinity|access-date=2021-03-02|website=Adoption Medicine Clinic – University of Minnesota|language=en}}</ref> Genetic relatedness measures how many genes a person shares. As all humans share over 99% of the same genes, consanguinity only matters for the small fraction of genes which vary between different persons.<ref name="Understanding genetics">{{cite web|last=Dr. Shafer|first=Aaron|title=Understanding genetics|url=http://genetics.thetech.org/ask/ask166|website=The Tech|publisher=Stanford University|access-date=13 December 2013}}</ref> Inheritance of genes has a random element to it,<ref name="Understanding genetics"/> and these two concepts are different.<ref name="Why half siblings share 25% of their DNA - Understanding">{{cite web|last=Dr. Starr|first=Barry|title=Why half siblings share 25% of their DNA – Understanding|url=http://genetics.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/why-siblings-share-around-fifty-percent-their-dna|website=The Tech|publisher=Stanford University|access-date=19 June 2014}}</ref> Consanguinity decreases by half for every generation of reproductive separation through their most recent common ancestor. Siblings are 50% related by consanguinity as they are separated from each other by two generation (sibling to parent to sibling) and they share two parents as common ancestors (<math>\left ( \tfrac{1}{2} \right )^2 + \left ( \tfrac{1}{2} \right )^2</math>).
 
A person may share more than the standard consanguinity with their sibling if their parents are related (the [[coefficient of inbreeding]] is greater than zero).{{citation needed|date=June 2020}} {{anchor|3quarters}}Interestingly, half -siblings can be related by as "three -quarters siblings" (related by 3/8) if their unshared parents have a consanguinity of 50%. This means the unshared parents are either siblings, making the half -siblings [[cousin]]s, or parent and child, making them half- [[aunt]]-[[uncle]] and [[niece]]-[[nephew]].<ref>{{cite web |last=Benitez |first=Cecil |url=https://geneticswww.thetech.org/ask-a-geneticist/articles/2011/ask430/ |title=UnderstandingHow Geneticsrelated are three-fourths siblings? |date=29 September 2011 |website=genetics.thetech.org[[The Tech Interactive]] |series=Ask a Geneticist |access-date=5 August 2024}}</ref>
A fraternal twin is a sibling and therefore is related by 50% consanguinity.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Coefficient of relationship – ISOGG Wiki|url=https://isogg.org/wiki/Coefficient_of_relationship|access-date=2021-03-02|website=isogg.org}}</ref> [[Fraternal twins]] are no more genetically similar than regular siblings. As [[identical twin]]s come from the same zygote, their most recent common ancestor is each other. They are genetically identical and 100% consanguineous as they are separated by zero generations (<math>\left ( \tfrac{1}{2} \right )^0</math>).<ref name="Understanding genetics"/> [[Twin study|Twin studies]] have been conducted by scientists to examine the roles that [[Nature versus nurture|genetics and environment]] play in the development of various traits. Such studies examine how often identical twins possess the same behavioral trait and compare it to how often fraternal twins possess the same trait.{{citation needed|date=June 2020}} In other studies twins are raised in separate families, and studies compare the passing on of a behavioral trait by the family environment and the possession of a common trait between identical twins. This kind of study has revealed that for personality traits which are known to be [[Heritability|heritable]], genetics play a substantial role throughout life and an even larger role during early years.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Plomin|first1=R|last2=Pederson|first2=N.L.|last3=McClearn|first3=G.E.|last4=Nesselroade|first4=J.R.|last5=Bergeman|first5=C.S.|title=EAS temperaments during the last half of the life span: Twins reared apart and twins reared together|journal=Psychology and Aging|date=1988|volume=3|issue=1|pages=43–50|doi=10.1037/0882-7974.3.1.43|pmid=3268242}}</ref>
 
===Percentage distribution===
Half siblings are 25% related by consanguinity as they share one parent and separated from each other by two generations (<math>\left ( \tfrac{1}{2} \right )^2</math>). There is a very small chance that two half-siblings might not share any genes, if they didn't inherit any of the same chromosomes from their shared parent. This is possible for full siblings as well, though even more unlikely. But because of how [[homologous chromosomes]] swap genes (due to [[chromosomal crossover]] during [[meiosis]]) during the development of an egg or sperm cell, however, the odds of this ever actually occurring are practically non-existent.<ref name="Why half siblings share 25% of their DNA - Understanding"/>
In practice, full siblings do not share exactly 50% of their DNA, as [[chromosomal crossover]] only occurs a limited number of times and, therefore, large chunks of a chromosome are shared or not shared at one time. In fact, the mean DNA fraction shared is 50.28% with a standard deviation of 3.68%,<ref>{{cite journal | pmc=4037293 | year=2013 | last1=Vinkhuyzen | first1=A. A. | last2=Wray | first2=N. R. | last3=Yang | first3=J. | last4=Goddard | first4=M. E. | last5=Visscher | first5=P. M. | title=Estimation and Partitioning of Heritability in Human Populations using Whole Genome Analysis Methods | journal=Annual Review of Genetics | volume=47 | pages=75–95 | doi=10.1146/annurev-genet-111212-133258 | pmid=23988118 }}</ref> meaning approximately 1/4 of sibling pairs share more than 52.76% of their DNA, while 1/4 share less than 47.8%.<ref>Calculated based on the [[Standard deviation#Rules for normally distributed data|normal distribution]]</ref>
 
Half siblings are 25% related by consanguinity as they share one parent and separated from each other by two generations (<math>\left ( \tfrac{1}{2} \right )^2</math>). There is a very small chance that two half-siblings might not share any genes, if they didn't inherit any of the same chromosomes from their shared parent. This is possible for full -siblings as well, though even more unlikely. But because of how [[homologous chromosomes]] swap genes (due to [[chromosomal crossover]] during [[meiosis]]) during the development of an egg or sperm cell, however, the odds of this ever actually occurring are practically non-existent.<ref name="WhyAsk halfa siblings share 25% of their DNA -Geneticist Understanding2013"/>
A person may share more than the standard consanguinity with their sibling if their parents are related (the [[coefficient of inbreeding]] is greater than zero).{{citation needed|date=June 2020}} {{anchor|3quarters}}Interestingly half siblings can be related by as "three quarters siblings" (related by 3/8) if their unshared parents have a consanguinity of 50%. This means the unshared parents are either siblings, making the half siblings [[cousin]]s, or parent and child, making them half [[aunt]]-[[uncle]] and [[niece]]-[[nephew]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://genetics.thetech.org/ask/ask430 |title=Understanding Genetics |website=genetics.thetech.org}}</ref>
 
==Birth order==
{{Main|Birth order}}
[[File:P S Krøyer 1897 - Døtrene Benzon.jpg|thumb|upright|''The Benzon Daughters'' by [[Peder Severin Krøyer]]]]
[[File:Pedro II of Brazil and his sisters 1839.JPG|thumb|upright|Emperor [[Pedro II of Brazil]] with his sisters Princesses [[Princess Francisca of Brazil|Francisca]] and [[Princess Januária of Brazil|Januária]], 1839]]
 
Birth order is a person's rank by age among his or her siblings. Typically, researchers classify siblings as "eldest", "middle child", and "youngest" or simply distinguish between "firstbornfirst-born" and "later-born" children.
 
Birth order is commonly believed in [[pop psychology]] and popular culture to have a profound and lasting effect on psychological development and [[Personality psychology|personality]]. For example, firstborns are seen as conservative and high -achieving, middle children as natural mediators, and youngest children as charming and outgoing. Despite its lasting presence in the public domain, studies have failed to consistently produce clear, valid, and compelling findings.; Thereforetherefore, it has earned the title of a [[Pseudoscience|pseudo-psychology]] amongst the scientific psychological community.<ref name="Psychology Around Us">{{cite book|last1=Comer|first1=Ronald|last2=Gould|first2=Elizabeth|last3=Ogden|first3=Nancy|last4=Boyes|first4=Michael|title=Psychology Around Us|url=https://archive.org/details/psychologyaround0000come|url-access=registration|date=February 2012|publisher=Wiley}}</ref>
 
===History===
Line 79 ⟶ 103:
 
==== Galton ====
In his book ''English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture'' (1874), Galton noted that prominent composers and scientists are over-represented as first-borns.<ref name="intelltheory.com">{{cite web|last1=Esping|first1=Amber|title=Does Birth Order Affect Intelligence?|url=http://www.intelltheory.com/birthOrder.shtml|website=Human Intelligence|access-date=2014-11-15|archive-date=2020-02-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200214171030/http://www.intelltheory.com/birthOrder.shtml|url-status=dead}}</ref> He theorized three main reasons as to why first-borns are generally more eminent:
# [[Primogeniture]] laws: first-borns have access to their parents' financial resources to continue their education.<ref name="intelltheory.com"/>
# First-borns are given more responsibility than their younger siblings and are treated more as companions by their parents.<ref name="intelltheory.com"/>
Line 90 ⟶ 114:
 
=== Contemporary findings ===
Today, the flaws and inconsistencies in birth order research eliminate its validity. It is very difficult to control solely for factors related to birth order, and therefore most studies produce ambiguous results.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Embedded into theories of birth order is a debate of nature versus nurture. It has been disproved that there is something innate in the position one is born into, and therefore creating a preset role. Birth order has no genetic basis.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Wichman|first1=A.L.|last2=Rodgers|first2=J.L.|last3=MacCallum|first3=R.C.|title=A Multilevel Approach to the Relationship Between Birth Order and Intelligence|journal=Society for Personality and Social Psychology Inc|date=2006|volume=32|issue=1|pages=117–127|doi=10.1177/0146167205279581|pmid=16317193|s2cid=5791756|url=https://semanticscholar.org/paper/b416b9512f3c192d467e0eba1338ff38fc8d0afc}}</ref>
 
The social interaction that occurs as a result of birth order however is the most notable. Older siblings often become role models of behaviour, and younger siblings become learners and supervisees. Older siblings are at a developmental advantage both cognitively and socially. The role of birth order also depends greatly and varies greatly on family context. Family size, sibling identification, age gap, modeling, parenting techniques, gender, class, race, and temperament are all confounding variables that can influence behaviour and therefore perceived behaviour of specific birth categories.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Eckstein|first1=D.|last2=Kaufman|first2=J.A.|title=The Role of Birth Order in Personality: An Enduring Intellectual Legacy of Alfred Adler|journal=The Journal of Individual Psychology|date=2012|volume=68|issue=1|pages=60–61}}</ref> The research on birth order does have stronger correlations, however, in areas such as intelligence and physical features, but are likely caused by other factors other than the actual position of birth. Some research has found that firstborn children have slightly higher [[IQ]]s on average than later born children.<ref>{{cite news |author=Carey, Benedict |url=http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/21/africa/siblings.php |title=Family dynamics, not biology, behind higher IQ |newspaper=International Herald Tribune |date=June 21, 2007 |access-date=July 15, 2007}}</ref> However, other research finds no such effect.<ref>Rodgers, J.L., Cleveland, H.H., van den Oord, E. and Rowe, D. (2000). Resolving the Debate Over Birth Order, Family Size and Intelligence. ''American Psychologist'', Vol. 55.</ref> It has been found that first-borns score three points higher compared to second borns and that children born earlier in a family are on average, taller and weigh more than those born later.<ref name="Psychology Around Us"/> However, it is impossible to generalize birth order characteristics and apply them universally to all individuals in that subgroup.
Line 115 ⟶ 139:
 
==Regressive behavior at birth==
{{unreferenced section|date=July 2008}}
[[File:Trio Of Boys (54780902).jpeg|thumb|A [[newborn]] and his brothers]]
[[File:Four Sisters MET DP72050.jpg|thumb|Four Sisters ([[Frank Eugene]], about 1900)]]
The arrival of a new baby is especially stressful for firstborns and for siblings between 3 and 5 years old. Regressive behavior and aggressive behavior, such as handling the baby roughly, can also occur. All of these symptoms are considered to be typical and developmentally appropriate for children between the ages of 3–5.{{Citation needed|date=June 2008}} While some can be prevented, the remainder can be improved within a few months. Regressive behavior may include demand for a bottle, thumb sucking, requests to wear diapers (even if toilet-trained), or requests to carry a [[security blanket]].
 
Regressive behaviors are the child's way of demanding the parents' love and attention.
 
The arrival of a new baby is especially stressful for firstborns and for siblings between 3 and 5 years old. RegressiveIn such situations, regressive behavior andmay be accompanied by aggressive behavior, such as handling the baby roughly, can also occur. All of these symptoms are considered to be typical and developmentally appropriate for children between the ages of 3–5.{{Citation3 needed|date=Juneand 2008}}5. While some can be prevented, the remainder can be improved within a few months. Regressive behavior may include demand for a bottle, thumb sucking, requests to wear diapers (even if toilet-trained), or requests to carry a [[security blanket]].
The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] suggests{{Citation needed|date=July 2008}} that instead of protesting or telling children to act their age, parents should simply grant their requests without becoming upset. The affected children will soon return to their normal routine when they realize that they now have just as important a place in the family as the new sibling. Most of the behaviors can be improved within a few months.
 
The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] suggests{{Citation needed|date=July 2008}} that instead of protesting or telling children to act their age, parents should simply grant their requests without becoming upset. The affected children will soon return to their normal routine when they realize that they now have just as important a place in the family as the new sibling. Most of the behaviors can be improved within a few months.
 
The [[University of Michigan Health System]] advises{{Citation needed|date=July 2008}} that most occurrences of regressive behavior are mild and to be expected; however, it recommends parents to contact a pediatrician or child psychologist if the older child tries to hurt the baby, if regressive behavior does not improve within 2 or 3 months, or if the parents have other questions or concerns.
 
==Rivalry==
{{Main|Sibling rivalry}}
[[File:Sir Joshua Reynolds 004- Lady Cockburn and Her Three Eldest Sons (1773-1775).jpg|thumb|upright|''[[Portrait of Lady Cockburn and her Three Eldest Sons]]'' (1773–1775) by [[Joshua Reynolds]]]]
 
"Sibling rivalry" is a type of competition or animosity among brothers and sisters. It appears to be particularly intense when children are very close in age or of the same gender.<ref>[http://www.sylviarimm.com/article13.html The Effects of Sibling Competition] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070701155521/http://www.sylviarimm.com/article13.html |date=2007-07-01 }} Syliva B. Rimm, Educational Assessment Service, 2002.</ref> Sibling rivalry can involve [[aggression]]; however, it is not the same as [[sibling abuse]] where one child victimizes another.
 
Sibling rivalry usually starts right after, or before, the arrival of the second child. While siblings will still love each other, it is not uncommon for them to bicker and be malicious to each other.<ref name= "newbaby">[http://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/yourchild/newbaby.htm New Baby Sibling] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200807085406/http://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/yourchild/newbaby.htm |date=2020-08-07 }} University of Michigan Health System, June 2006</ref> Children are sensitive from the age of 1 year to differences in parental treatment and by 3 years they have a sophisticated grasp of family rules and can evaluate themselves in relation to their siblings.<ref name="psychtoday"/> Sibling rivalry often continues throughout childhood and can be very frustrating and stressful to parents.<ref name="michigan">[http://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/yourchild/sibriv.htm Sibling Rivalry] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170630010831/http://www.med.umich.edu/1libr/yourchild/sibriv.htm |date=2017-06-30 }} University of Michigan Health System, October 2006</ref> One study found that the age group 10–15 reported the highest level of competition between siblings.<ref name="mcnerney">[http://jrscience.wcp.muohio.edu/humannature01/FinalArticles/SiblingRivalryinDegreeand.html Sibling Rivalry in Degree and Dimensions Across the Lifespan] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171015222353/http://jrscience.wcp.muohio.edu/humannature01/FinalArticles/SiblingRivalryinDegreeand.html |date=2017-10-15 }} Annie McNerney and Joy Usner, 30 April 2001.</ref> Sibling rivalry can continue into adulthood and sibling relationships can change dramatically over the years. Approximately one-third of adults describe their relationship with siblings as rivalrous or distant. However, rivalry often lessens over time and at least 80% of siblings over age 60 enjoy close ties.<ref name="psychtoday"/>
 
Each child in a family competes to define who they are as persons and want to show that they are separate from their siblings. Sibling rivalry increases when children feel they are getting unequal amounts of their parents' attention, where there is stress in the parents' and children's lives, and where fighting is accepted by the family as a way to resolve conflicts.<ref name="michigan"/> [[Sigmund Freud]] saw the sibling relationship as an extension of the [[Oedipus complex]], where brothers were in competition for their mother's attention and sisters for their father's.<ref>[{{Cite web |url=http://www.freud-museum.at/e/inhalt/wissenJulietMitchell2003.html |title=Freud Lecture: Juliet Mitchell, 2003] |access-date=2007-07-15 |archive-date=2012-02-04 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120204101639/http://www.freud-museum.at/e/inhalt/wissenJulietMitchell2003.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> [[Evolutionary psychologist]]s explain sibling rivalry in terms of [[parental investment]] and [[kin selection]]: a parent is inclined to spread resources equally among all children in the family, but a child wants most of the resources for him or herself.<ref name="mcnerney"/>
 
==Relationships==
Line 150 ⟶ 176:
 
====Parental effect====
Children are more jealous of the interactions between newborns and their mothers than they are with newborns and their fathers.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> This is logical as up until the birth of the infant, the first-born child had the mother as his or hertheir primary care-giver all to his or herselfthemselves. Some research has suggested that children display less jealous reactions over father-newborn interactions because fathers tend to punish negative [[emotion]] and are less tolerant than mothers of clinginess and visible distress, although this is hard to generalize.<ref name="ReferenceB"/>
 
Children that have parents with a better marital relationship are better at regulating their jealous emotions.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> Children are more likely to express jealousy when their parents are directing their attention to the sibling as opposed to when the parents are solely interacting with them.<ref name="ReferenceB"/> Parents who are involved in good marital communication help their children cope adaptively with jealousy. They do this by modelling problem-solving and conflict resolution for their children. Children are also less likely to have jealous feelings when they live in a home in which everyone in the family shares and expresses love and happiness.<ref name="ReferenceB"/>
Line 171 ⟶ 197:
===Warmth===
 
Sibling warmth is a term for the degree of affection and companionship shared by siblings. Sibling warmth seems to have an effect on siblings. Higher sibling warmth is related to better [[social skill]] and higher perceived social competence. Even in cases where there is a high level of sibling conflict if there is also a high level of sibling warmth then social skills and competence remain unaffected.<ref name="ReferenceE">{{cite journal|last1=Buist|first1=Kirsten L.|last2=Vermande|first2=Marjolijn|title=Sibling Relationship Patterns and Their Associations with Child Competence and Problem Behavior|journal=Journal of Family Psychology|date=2014|volume=28|issue=4|pages=529–537|doi=10.1037/a0036990|pmid=24866727|s2cid=44281287|url=https://semanticscholar.org/paper/776b0e834c1ffe259c925d10c8c5a561f7473023}}</ref>
 
===Negative effects of conflict===
[[File:Sibling Conflict.jpg|thumb|Sibling physical conflict]]
The saying that people "fight like siblings" shows just how charged sibling conflict can be and how well recognized sibling squabbles are. In spite of how widely acknowledged these squabbles can be, sibling conflict can have several impacts on the sibling pair. It has been shown that increased levels of sibling conflict are related to higher levels of anxiety and depression in siblings, along with lower levels of self-worth and lower levels of academic competence. In addition, sibling warmth is not a protective factor for the negative effects of [[anxiety]], [[Depression (mood)|depression]], lack of [[self-worth]] and lower levels of academic competence. This means that sibling warmth does not counteract these negative effects.<ref name="ReferenceE"/> Sibling conflict is also linked to an increase in more risky behavior including: smoking cigarettes, skipping days of school, contact with the police, and other behaviors in Caucasian sibling pairs with the exception of firstborns with younger brothers. Except for the elder brother in this pair sibling conflict is positively correlated with risky behavior, thus sibling conflict may be a [[Risk factor (disambiguation)|risk factor]] for behavioral problems.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Solmeyer|first1=Anna|last2=McHale|first2=Susan|last3=Crouter|first3=Ann|title=Longitudinal Associations Between Sibling Relationship Qualities and Risky Behavior Across Adolescence|journal=Developmental Psychology|date=February 2014|volume=50|issue=2|pages=600–610|doi=10.1037/a0033207|pmid=23772819|pmc=3797172}}</ref>
A study on what the topic of the fight was (invasion of personal domain or inequality) also shows that the topic of the fight may have a result on the effects of the conflict. This study showed that sibling conflict over personal domain were related to lower levels of self-esteem, and sibling conflict over perceived inequalities seem to be more related to depressive symptoms. However, the study also showed that greater depressive and anxious symptoms were also related to more frequent sibling conflict and more intense sibling conflict.<ref name="ReferenceD"/>
 
Line 198 ⟶ 224:
* [[List of sibling groups]]
* [[Sibling relationship]]
* [[Sibling estrangement]]
* [[Siblings Day]]
* [[Sladdbarn]]
Line 217 ⟶ 244:
 
==Further reading==
* {{cite book|authorfirst1=Jeffrey |last1=Kluger|isbn=978-1594486111|title=The Sibling Effect: What the Bonds Among Brothers and Sisters Reveal About Us|year=2012|publisher=Penguin|url=https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Sibling_Effect.html?id=XbxacWS369kC}}
 
==External links==