Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 May 18: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Doc glasgow (talk | contribs) rv - we've done this to death. You can't have endless debates |
|||
Line 11:
ADD A NEW ENTRY BELOW THIS LINE IN THE FORMAT: {{subst:Newdelrev|pg=ARTICLE_NAME|reason=UNDELETE_REASON}} --~~~~ -->
====[[:Qian Zhijun]] (closed)====
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;"
|-
! style="background-color: #f2dfce; font-weight:normal;" |
* '''[[:Qian Zhijun]]''' – Close made ot perfectly plain that the procedural grounds for relisting was flawed, and that the content violates policy. A fight not worth having. – <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 15:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC) <!--*-->
|-
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The following is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the article above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>''
|-
| style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |
:{{la|Qian Zhijun}} <tt>(</tt>[[Special:Undelete/Qian Zhijun|restore]]<tt>|</tt><span class="plainlinks">[http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:{{fullurl:Qian Zhijun}} cache]</span><tt>|</tt>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qian Zhijun|AfD]]|[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qian Zhijun (second nomination)|2nd AfD]]<tt>)</tt>
Okay. Page originally AfD'd and relisted by [[User:Daniel Bryant]], and then [[User:Drini]] (I think) reversed that closure and deleted it. The DRV occurred 5 days ago and the decision was to overturn the deletion. The AfD was then closed by [[User:Thebainer]] as delete, pointing at the discussions that already showed a lack of consensus. This article meets every relevant guideline and policy, the subject is not a BLP issue given his role in the proceedings, and this needs to be undeleted. [[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 14:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
|-
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The above is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the article above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>''
|}
====[[:Template:Fur]]====
Line 42 ⟶ 52:
*::CoolCat - there are 1.5 million wikipedians or something - and you can't get a debate up? Could be that no-one but you cares?--[[User talk:Doc glasgow|Doc]]<sup>g</sup> 14:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
*:::Thats exactly correct. Out of the 1.5 million wikipedians no one is bothering to comment (people are however revert waring). "Could be that no-one but you cares?" comment is not a cfd criteria. Please avoid idle and useless comments as that one. --<small> [[User:Cool Cat|Cat]]</small> <sup>[[User talk:Cool Cat|chi?]]</sup> 14:44, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
*::::''"Could be that no-one but you cares?" comment is not a cfd criteria'' - No, it's an explanation as to why out of the 1.5 million wikipedians no one is bothering to comment. --[[User:Calton|Calton]] | [[User talk:Calton|Talk]] 15:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
| |||