|
ADD A NEW ENTRY BELOW THIS LINE IN THE FORMAT: {{subst:Newdelrev|pg=ARTICLE_NAME|reason=UNDELETE_REASON}} ~~~~ -->
====[[:Robyn Dawkins]] and [[:Gavin Clinton-Parker]] (closed)====
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;"
|-
! style="background-color: #f2dfce; font-weight:normal;" |
* '''[[:Robyn Dawkins]] and [[:Gavin Clinton-Parker]]''' – Deletion endorsed – [[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 00:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC) <!--*-->
|-
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The following is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the article above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>''
|-
| style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white;" |
====[[:Robyn Dawkins]] and [[:Gavin Clinton-Parker]]====
This isn't a hard discussion to close. There are living people involved here who have had no part in what happened to them--they were days old at the time. The arguments that say essentially "this subject should be covered" are valid. But we also have a policy on [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Biographies of living persons]] and its guiding principle is that of the hippocratic oath: first, do no harm. This subject, that of the terrible damage caused by hospital mishaps, can be covered adequately without creating articles about individuals who have been the subject of such mistakes and must live with them. Wikipedia is a top ten website, and such entries would follow these blameless people wherever they might go.
Numerically there is already a clear consensus to endorse the deletion. Morally, and I do not use that word lightly, there are unimpeachable reasons to endorse without prejudice to the information being used, sensitively and with due attention to balance and privacy, in other article. But we do not have the material to write a biography. These are private individuals.
In the name of Wikipedia and in the spirit of the [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|Biographies of living persons]] policy, this deletion stands. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 00:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
:{{la|Robyn Dawkins}} <tt>(</tt>[[Special:Undelete/Robyn Dawkins|restore]]<tt>|</tt><span class="plainlinks">[http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:{{fullurl:Robyn Dawkins}} cache]</span><tt>|</tt>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robyn Dawkins|AfD]]<tt>)</tt>
*'''overturn and list at afd''' [[WP:CSD|CSD A7]] states "assertion of notability" this article clearly does that and thus is not speedyable. It is also not deletable under BLP, it is sourced, there is no negative coverage. When will you people relise that unilateral action like this simply pisses off the community and causes a shitstorm of complaints. Take it through the proper deletion process and you will get none of the above. [[User:Viridae|Viridae]][[User talk:Viridae|<small><sup>Talk</sup></small>]] 00:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
|-
| style="text-align:center;" | ''The above is an archived debate of the [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] of the article above. <span style="color:red;">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>''
|}
====[[Frog and the Peach]] (closed)====
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align: left; border: 0px; margin-top: 0.2em;"
| 