German nuclear program during World War II: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 117:
Nine of the prominent German scientists who published reports in ''Kernphysikalische Forschungsberichte'' as members of the ''Uranverein''{{sfn|Walker|1993|loc=pp. 268–74 and Reference n. 40 on p. 262}} were picked up by [[Operation Alsos]] and incarcerated in England at Farm Hall in a bugged house under [[Operation Epsilon]]: [[Erich Bagge]], [[Kurt Diebner]], [[Walther Gerlach]], [[Otto Hahn]], [[Paul Harteck]], [[Werner Heisenberg]], [[Horst Korsching]], [[Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker]], and [[Karl Wirtz]]. Also incarcerated was [[Max von Laue]], although he had nothing to do with the nuclear weapon project. [[Samuel Goudsmit|Goudsmit]], the chief scientific advisor to Operation Alsos, thought von Laue might be beneficial to the postwar rebuilding of Germany and would benefit from the high level contacts he would have in England.{{sfn|Bernstein|2001|pp=50, 363–65}}
 
In 1992 the transcripts were declassified. Several physicists have analyzed the transcripts, particularly the section immediately after the German scientists were informed about the Hiroshima bombing. In the transcript, Heisenberg acts with disbelief, and argues that it would require "about a ton" of enriched uranium to make such a bomb. In justifying his reasoning, he gives a brief explanation of how one would calculate the critical mass for an atomic bomb which contained serious errors. Two scientists on the Manhattan Project, [[Edward Teller]] and [[Hans Bethe]], concluded after reading the transcripts that Heisenberg had never done the calculation before. Heisenberg himself, in the transcript, said that, "quite honestly I have never worked it [the critical mass calculation for an atomic bobbomb] out as I never believed one could get pure [uranium-]'235.'" A week later, Heisenberg gave a more formal lecture to his colleagues on the physics of the atomic bomb, which corrected many of his early mistakes and indicated a much smaller critical mass. Historians have cited Heisenberg's error as evidence of the degree to which his role in the project had been confined almost entirely to reactors, as the original equation is much more similar to how a reactor work than to an atomic bomb.{{sfn|Bernstein|2001|pp=129-131, 171, 191-207}}<ref>{{Cite web |last=POPP |first=Manfred |date=2017-01-04 |title=Darum hatte Hitler keine Atombombe |url=https://www.zeit.de/wissen/geschichte/2016-12/ns-zeit-adolf-hitler-atombombe-entwicklung-werner-heisenberg-kernphysik/komplettansicht |website=Die Zeit.}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |last=Teller |first=Edward |title=Heisenberg, Bohr and the atomic bomb |url=https://www.webofstories.com/people/edward.teller/34?o=SH |access-date=2023-08-02 |language=en}}</ref>
 
====Oranienburg plant====