Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 May 23: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
El Sandifer (talk | contribs) |
→[[:Crystal Gail Mangum]]: endorse |
||
Line 246:
*'''undelete''' the amount of interest and coverage at Wikipedia alone speaks for itself. --[[User:Cumbrowski|'''roy''']]<sac> [[User talk:Cumbrowski|<font color="red"><b><sup>Talk!</sup></b></font>]] .oOo. 15:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
*'''Keep deleted''' - I am unconvinced that there is any persuasive reason to keep this separately from the scandal article. What about her is significant that is not something that would be covered in a well-written article on the scandal? [[User:Phil Sandifer|Phil Sandifer]] 15:40, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
* '''Endorse deletion''' per [[WP:CSD#G10]], pages that serve no purpose but to disparage their subject. It is abundandtly clear form the content and history of this article and [[2006 Duke University lacrosse team scandal]] thast both have always exiosted primarily as a vendetta against this individual, pursued zealously by the team and their supporters. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 15:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
====[[:Connections Academy]] (closed)====
| |||