Joel Chandler Harris: Difference between revisions

 

Some 21st-century scholars have argued that the Uncle Remus tales satirized the very "plantation school" that some readers believed his work supported. Critic Robert Cochran noted: "Harris went to the world as the trickster Brer Rabbit, and in the trickster Uncle Remus he projected both his sharpest critique of things as they were and the deepest image of his heart's desire."<ref>{{cite journal |author=Cochran, Robert|title=Black father: the subversive achievement of Joel Chandler Harris |journal=African American Review|year= 2004|volume= 38|issue=1|pages=21–34|jstor=1512229}}</ref> Harris omitted the Southern plantation house, disparaged the white Southern gentleman, and presented [[miscegenation]] in positive terms. He violated social codes and presented an ethos that would have otherwise shocked his reading audience.<ref>Pamplin, Claire (2006). "Plantation Makeover: Joel Chandler Harris's Myths and Violations", pp. 33–51 in ''The great American makeover: television, history, nation''. Palgrave Macmillan. {{ISBN|1403974845}}.</ref> These recent acknowledgements echo early observations from [[Walter Hines Page]], who wrote in 1884 that Harris "hardly conceals his scorn for the old aristocracy" and makes "a sly thrust at the pompous life of the Old South."<ref>Hendrick, Burton J., ed. (1928). ''The Training of an American: The Earlier Life and Letters of Walter H. Page, 1855–1913''. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.</ref>

 

=== Influence ===