Hemp Farming Act of 2018: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Per WP:HOWTOSD
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
Tag: Reverted
Line 11:
 
==History==
HempHHemp production in the United States essentially ceased in the 1950s due to market conditions and federal regulations.{{sfn|Johnson|2017|p=7}}{{sfn|Shepherd|1999}}{{sfn|Hopkins|2015|pp=193–208}} Since the mid-1990s, there has been a resurgence of interest in the United States in producing industrial hemp.{{sfn|Johnson|2017|p=14}}<!-- verbatim --> Executive Order 12919 (1994) identified hemp as a strategic national product that should be stockpiled.<ref>[https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/15714 Executive Order 1219], Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)</ref><ref>{{citation|title=About Industrial Hemp |publisher=New Mexico Legislature|url=https://www.nmlegis.gov/lcs/handouts/ERDT%20090214%20Item%209%20Facts%20About%20Industrial%20Hemp.pdf|access-date=2017-04-14}}</ref>
 
The 2018 legislation was preceded by a failed Industrial Hemp Farming Act (109th Congress [House] and 114th Congress [Senate]) and a hemp- and CBD-related attempt to amend to the Controlled Substances Act (114th Congress);{{sfn|Johnson|2017|p=Summary}} and the [[Agricultural Act of 2014]], which created a regulated, national agricultural hemp pilot program under which states could create their own pilot program regulations. There existed "ongoing tension between federal and state authorities over state hemp policies" due to non-cooperation of the DEA with state programs,{{sfn|Johnson|2017|p=17}} and lawsuits brought or threatened by farmers and states against the DEA.<ref name=Barrett>{{citation|title=Farmers, Drug Enforcement Administration at odds over hemp|author=Rick Barrett|newspaper=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel |date=February 15, 2018|url=https://www.jsonline.com/story/money/business/2018/02/15/wisconsin-farmers-ready-grow-hemp-again-but-some-products-challenged-drug-enforcement-officials/342585002/}}</ref><ref>{{citation|newspaper=[[The News & Observer]]|location=Raleigh, NC|title=NC hemp commission considers joining lawsuit against DEA|author=Rachel Chason|date=April 4, 2017 |url=http://www.newsobserver.com/news/business/article142568559.html}}</ref> The DEA and conflicting Federal court decisions regarding "low THC content [hemp] and marijuana of greater THC content"{{sfn|Johnson|2017|p=19}} left a perplexing environment for would-be producers with "general uncertainty about how federal authorities will respond to production in states where state laws allow cultivation", especially after the Justice Department's 2018 recission of the 2013 [[Cole Memorandum]].{{sfn|Johnson|2017|p=21}} By 2018, groups calling for [[Removal of cannabis from Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act|de-scheduling of hemp]] included the [[American Farm Bureau Federation]], the [[National Association of State Departments of Agriculture]], the [[National Farmers Union (United States)|National Farmers Union]] and the [[National Conference of State Legislatures]].<ref name=Barrett/>