Wright brothers patent war: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 120:
In January 1914, a U.S. [[United States courts of appeals|Circuit Court of Appeals]] upheld the verdict in favor of the Wrights against the Curtiss company, which continued to avoid penalties through legal tactics.
 
In light of these setbacks and to discredit the Wright brothers, Glenn Curtiss in 1914 helped the head of the Smithsonian, [[Charles Doolittle Walcott]], secretly make major modifications to a failed aerodrome built in 1903 by Professor [[Samuel Langley]] in 1903 to make it appear to be able to fly. After the flight demonstrations, Walcott ordered the Langley machine be restored to its 1903 condition to cover up the deception before it was put on display.<ref>https://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_sic_2907</ref><ref>https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/daav/appendix-c.htm</ref> It took until 1928 for the Smithsonian Board of Regents to pass a resolution acknowledging that the Wright brothers deserved the credit for "the first successful flight with a power-propelled heavier-than-air machine carrying a man."<ref>{{Cite book|last=McCullough, David G.|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/897424190|title=The Wright brothers|year=2015|isbn=978-1-4767-2874-2|edition=First Simon & Schuster hardcover|location=New York|pages=259|oclc=897424190}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last=Smithsonian Institution|first=National Air and Space Museum|date=2020|title=The Wright-Smithsonian Feud The Wright Flyer: From Invention to Icon|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221118063845/https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/wright-brothers/online/icon/feud.cfm|website=The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum}}</ref>
 
Beginning in 2011, Russell Klingaman—a prominent Wisconsin aviation/patent attorney, aviation law journalist, and instructor in Aviation Law at [[Marquette University Law School]]<ref name="klingaman_2016_waco_museum">[http://www.wacoairmuseum.org/avls-wrights-vs-curtiss.html "Aviation Lecture Series: Wrights vs. Curtis - The Patent Wars,"] 2016, WACO Air Museum, retrieved December 4, 2017</ref><ref name="klingaman_bio_2016_06_midwest_flyer">[https://issuu.com/midwestflyer/docs/mfm_junejuly2016_web Klingaman bio note] in ''Midwest Flyer'' June–July 2016, as archived at [[issuu.com]], retrieved December 4, 2017</ref><ref name="klingaman_univ_wisconsin_alumni">[http://alumnius.net/university_of_wiscon-9690-944 "Russell Klingaman,"] ''Alumni,'' [[University of Wisconsin]], retrieved December 4, 2017</ref>—researched, prepared and delivered a series of lectures, at major aviation events and lawyers' organizations, analyzing and decrying the events and outcomes of the Wright-Curtiss lawsuit, citing numerous examples of error or misconduct by various parties to the suit, including attorneys and the judge. Klingaman found that the judge in the case allowed the Wrights' attorney to make his case in a private ("[[ex-parte]]") hearing with the judge, without the opposing side present, and discovered other misconduct which he believes led to a legally inappropriate outcome.<ref name="klingaman_2014_airventure">Klingaman, Russell, "The Aileron Patent Wars: How Attorney Misconduct and Bad Business Decisions Ruined Fortunes and Cost Lives with a Negative Impact on Allied Power in the First World War," EAA AirVenture Oshkosh, [[Oshkosh, Wisconsin]], July 2014.</ref><ref name="eaa_klingaman_lecture_item">[https://www.eaa.org/eaa/event/Wrights_v_Curtiss_Patent_Wars?id=316492F1103541E1AA632616FC6DBC4B "Wrights v Curtiss Patent Wars.mht"] itenerary, for [[AirVenture]], [[Experimental Aircraft Association]]</ref><ref name="klingaman_cv">[https://www.hinshawlaw.com/attorneys-Russell-Klingaman.html#Presentations "Russell Klingaman: Presentations"], HinshawLaw.com</ref>