Content deleted Content added
m Moving from Category:1971 in law to Category:1971 in American law using Cat-a-lot |
→1990s to present: update with SB 522 passage |
||
Line 106:
==== Fraudulent redemption of out-of-state containers ====
Redemption of out-of-state containers is considered a fraud and prohibited by the bottle bill. Retailers and redemption centers may refuse to accept containers when they have reasonable grounds to believe they were purchased outside of Oregon. Staff at some locations near the state border request receipts proving the containers being redeemed were purchased in Oregon.<ref name="ofaq" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.bottledropcenters.com/About/FAQ|title=BottleDrop Oregon Redemption Centers FAQ|access-date=May 2, 2019|quote=No, bringing any amount of out of state purchased cans and bottles in to Oregon for a refund is fraudulent per the Oregon Bottle Bill. A person does not have to be an Oregon resident to redeem containers in Oregon, but only beverage containers that were purchased in Oregon may legally be redeemed in Oregon. If you live out of state and purchase deposit eligible containers in Oregon, we advise to keep those receipts to present to BottleDrop staff upon request.}}</ref> Fraudulent redemption has been a problem according to [[KATU (TV)|KATU]] news. As told to KATU reporter by a coop (OBRC) representative, the redemption center staff at [[Delta Park]] near the state boundary catches about 50 people per day from Washington.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://katu.com/news/local/oregon-recycling-centers-seeing-more-non-redeemable-containers-from-washington|title=Oregon recycling centers seeing more non-redeemable containers -- from Washington|last=English|first=Joe|date=December 8, 2018|work=KATU|access-date=May 2, 2019}}</ref> [[C-Tran (Washington)|C-TRAN]] which operates public transit service that traverses between [[Vancouver, Washington]] and [[Portland, Oregon|Portland]] have banned the carrying of empty beverage containers on their service for safety and sanitation reasons created by people who carry cans across the state line on their service to redeem them in Portland.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.columbian.com/news/2018/sep/14/c-tran-to-ban-empty-bottles-and-cans/|title=C-Tran to ban empty bottles and cans|date=2018-09-14|website=The Columbian|language=en|access-date=2019-05-02}}</ref> Jules Bailey speaking on behalf of the OBRC states he does not know the magnitude of the problem, but that it is mostly an issue with Washington containers around the Columbia corridor and minimal issues with California or Idaho.<ref>http://oregon.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?clip_id=26771 House Committee On Energy and Environment 2019-05-02 1PM, Jules Bailey (OBRC) 23:20</ref> Senate Bill 522 sponsored by senator [[Betsy Johnson (politician)|Betsy Johnson]] from [[Scappoose, Oregon|Scappoose]] fines those who bring out-of-state containers.
In the November 2020 State audit, the report says OBRC claims that the cost of cross-border fraud is "upwards of $10 million" however, the [[Oregon Secretary of State]]'s Audits Division could not validate OBRC's claim.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Withycombe|first=Claire|date=November 10, 2020|title=Audit: 50 years on, Oregon can do more to boost environmental effects of bottle deposit|url=https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/politics/2020/11/10/audit-oregon-bill-environmental-goals-recycling-center/6229830002/|access-date=2020-11-15|website=Statesman Journal|language=en-US}}</ref> In preparing the report, representatives from the Audits Division visited two BottleDrop redemption centers near the Washington border and they reported observing numerous people arriving in vehicles with Washington license plates or without any plates.<ref name=":15">{{Cite web|last=Jaquiss|first=Nigel|date=November 10, 2020|title=State Audit of Oregon's Iconic Bottle Bill Notes Cross-Border Fraud, Missed Opportunity in Wine, Liquor Redemption|url=https://www.wweek.com/news/state/2020/11/10/state-audit-of-oregons-iconic-bottle-bill-notes-cross-border-fraud-opportunity-in-wine-liquor-redemption/|access-date=2020-11-15|website=Willamette Week|language=en-US}}</ref>
Line 249:
The next change came into effect in January 2018, when additional categories of beverages were required to have a deposit.<ref name="FAQs" />
January 2020: The act of returning containers fraudulent became a violation effective January 1, 2020.<ref name=":21" /> The OLCC announced the addition of 4oz to 1.5 liter sized Kefir, drinkable yogurt, milk-based smoothies and other beverages which are mostly milk or milk substitute with additions of other ingredients. Milk and plant-based milk substitutes are not covered,<ref name="2019c" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://ktvz.com/news/oregon-northwest/2019/12/20/oregon-bottle-bill-changes-additions-coming-in-new-year/|title=Oregon Bottle Bill changes, additions coming in new year|last=Lerten|first=Barney|date=2019-12-21|website=KTVZ|language=en-US|access-date=2019-12-24}}</ref> however, the same agency announced it was withdrawing the decision<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.oregon.gov/OLCC/Pages/bottle_bill.aspx|title=The Bottle Bill & Redemption Centers|website=OLCC Bottle Bill|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200212030600/https://www.oregon.gov/OLCC/Pages/bottle_bill.aspx|archive-date=2020-02-12}}</ref> on February 5, 2020 due to the concerns caused by spilt milk in the OBRC's back-end.<ref name=":9" /> In the 2018 expansion, Kefir was exempt from having a refund value.<ref name="FAQs" />
A 2020 audit conducted by the state recommends shifting some or all of unclaimed deposit to the state. Throughout the history of Oregon Bottle Bill, these funds have been kept by the beverage industry.<ref name=":13">{{Cite web|date=November 2020|title=Oregon Has an Opportunity to Modernize Groundbreaking Bottle Bill on Its 50th Anniversary (Report 2020-36)|url=https://sos.oregon.gov/audits/Documents/2020-36.pdf|publisher=Audits Division, State of Oregon}}</ref><ref name=":14" /> The 2020 Secretary of State audit recommends all or portions of unredeemed deposit to be remitted to the state for recycling or environmental program as done in all states with bottle deposit except Oregon and Iowa instead of letting OBRC keep it.<ref name=":14" />
|