Aerospace manufacturer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Fix cite date error
Tags: AWB Reverted
Restored revision 1155054004 by 2001:14BA:4664:2900:8427:4EF8:A1B9:F1D0 (talk): Remove apparent spam citations with no connection to the article
Line 92:
Following are Texas, [[Georgia (U.S. state)|Georgia]], [[Arizona]] and [[Colorado]].<ref name=PwCsep2018/>
 
In the US, the [[United States Department of Defense|Department of Defense]] and [[NASA]] are the two biggest consumers of aerospace technology and products.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Sims |first=Eleni Myerscitation needed|date=MarchJanuary 2009 |title=The Department of Defense Space Test Program: Come fly with us |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aero.2009.4839351 |journal=2009 IEEE Aerospace conference |publisher=IEEE |doi=10.1109/aero.2009.4839351}}</ref> The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States reported that the aerospace industry employed 444,000 wage and salary jobs in 2004, many of which were in Washington and California,{{citation needed|date=January 2009}} this marked a steep decline from the peak years during the [[Reagan Administration]] when total employment exceeded 1,000,000 aerospace industry workers.<ref>Parker, Dana T. ''Building Victory: Aircraft Manufacturing in the Los Angeles Area in World War II,'' pp. 131-2, Cypress, CA, 2013.</ref>
 
{{more citations needed|section|date=January 2023}}
Line 110:
Several consolidations took place in the aerospace and defense industries over the last few decades.
 
[[BAE Systems]] is the successor company to numerous British aircraft manufacturers which merged throughout the second half of the 20th century. Many of these mergers followed the [[1957 Defence White Paper]].<ref>{{Citation needed|titlereason=TheSpecific 1957claim defence White Paperrequires source|date=2014-07-11February |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315768205-26 |work=Britain and the World since 1945 |pages=218–218 |access-date=2023-07-04 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-315-76820-52021}}</ref>
 
[[Airbus]] prominently illustrated the European airliner manufacturing consolidation in the late 1960s.<ref name=AvWeek12jul2018/>
Line 154:
|}
 
The OctoberOct. 16, 2017 announcement of the [[CSeries]] partnership between [[Airbus]] and [[Bombardier Aerospace]] could trigger a daisy chain of reactions towards a new order.<!--<ref name=AvWeek18oct2017/>-->
Airbus gets a new, efficient model at the lower end of the [[narrowbody]] market which provides the bulk of [[airliner]] profits and can abandon the slow selling [[Airbus A319|A319]] while Bombardier benefits from the growth in this expanded market even if it holds a smaller residual stake.<!--<ref name=AvWeek18oct2017/>-->
Boeing could forge a similar alliance with either [[Embraer]] with its [[E-jet E2]] or [[Mitsubishi Heavy Industries]] and its [[Mitsubishi Regional Jet|MRJ]].<ref name=AvWeek18oct2017>{{cite news |url= http://aviationweek.com/commercial-aviation/opinion-c-series-deal-ends-aerospace-status-quo |title= Opinion: C Series Deal Ends Aerospace Status Quo |date= Oct 18, 2017 |author= Jerrold T. Lundquist |work= Aviation Week & Space Technology}}</ref>