Content deleted Content added
Line 52:
==Criticism==
Polaris Project has been criticized by journalists, sex workers and some public health advocates. ''Reason'' magazine editor Elizabeth Nolan Brown referred to Polaris as "one of the biggest purveyors of bad statistics dressed up as 'human trafficking awareness'".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Nolan Brown |first1=Elizabeth |title=Super Bowl Sex Trafficking Myths Return |url=https://reason.com/2020/01/10/super-bowl-sex-trafficking-myths-return/ |access-date=10 January 2020 |work=Reason |publisher=Reason Foundation |date=January 10, 2020}}</ref> Sex worker advocates have stated the human trafficking hotline operated by Polaris is not confidential, and that calls to the hotline are referred to police who then arrest [[
The accuracy of Polaris’ data on human trafficking has been questioned by multiple sources. In 2011, Polaris was criticized for knowingly using false and misleading data to exaggerate the number of trafficked sex workers and understate their age of entry into sex work.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/21/1047597/-Why-are-Sex-Worker-and-Public-Health-Advocates-Annoyed-with-Google# |title=Why are Sex Workers and Public Health Advocates Annoyed with Google? |publisher=Dailykos |date=2011-12-21 |access-date=2015-01-29}}</ref> Polaris later partnered with data analysis firm [[Palantir Technologies]] to improve the organization of data reported to the [[National Human Trafficking Resource Center]] and the accuracy of statistics released to the public.<ref>{{Cite web|title = How Big Data Battles Human Trafficking|url = https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/01/14/how-big-data-is-being-used-in-the-fight-against-human-trafficking|access-date = 2015-08-26|first = Tierney|last = Sneed}}</ref>
|