Polaris Project: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 52:
 
==Criticism==
Polaris Project has been criticized by journalists, sex workers and some public health advocates. ''Reason'' magazine editor Elizabeth Nolan Brown referred to Polaris as "one of the biggest purveyors of bad statistics dressed up as 'human trafficking awareness'".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Nolan Brown |first1=Elizabeth |title=Super Bowl Sex Trafficking Myths Return |url=https://reason.com/2020/01/10/super-bowl-sex-trafficking-myths-return/ |access-date=10 January 2020 |work=Reason |publisher=Reason Foundation |date=January 10, 2020}}</ref> Sex worker advocates have stated the human trafficking hotline operated by Polaris is not confidential, and that calls to the hotline are referred to police who then arrest [[prostitutessex worker|adult sex workers]].<ref>{{cite web |last1=D |first1=Robin |title=Big Mother is Watching You: The Polaris Project & Rhode Island |url=http://titsandsass.com/big-mother-is-watching-you-the-polaris-project-rhode-island/#comment-921592 |website=Tits and Sass |date=25 June 2015 |access-date=10 January 2020}}</ref> However, at least as of 2022, The National Human Trafficking Hotline is confidential, except in cases where an call is made about someone under 18 suspected of abuse, in which case reporting to law enforcement may be required by law.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Confidentiality Policy {{!}} National Human Trafficking Hotline |url=https://humantraffickinghotline.org/en/confidentiality-policy |access-date=2023-05-30 |website=humantraffickinghotline.org |language=en}}</ref> Others have criticized Polaris for providing no services to alleged victims.{{Citation needed|date=November 2021}} Critics argue that Polaris Project fails to distinguish between consenting adults who choose to participate in sex work from those who are actual victims of coercion. They also state that because Polaris advocates law enforcement solutions to abolish sex work, sex workers themselves are harmed, face arrest, or may be driven further underground.
 
The accuracy of Polaris’ data on human trafficking has been questioned by multiple sources. In 2011, Polaris was criticized for knowingly using false and misleading data to exaggerate the number of trafficked sex workers and understate their age of entry into sex work.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/12/21/1047597/-Why-are-Sex-Worker-and-Public-Health-Advocates-Annoyed-with-Google# |title=Why are Sex Workers and Public Health Advocates Annoyed with Google? |publisher=Dailykos |date=2011-12-21 |access-date=2015-01-29}}</ref> Polaris later partnered with data analysis firm [[Palantir Technologies]] to improve the organization of data reported to the [[National Human Trafficking Resource Center]] and the accuracy of statistics released to the public.<ref>{{Cite web|title = How Big Data Battles Human Trafficking|url = https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/01/14/how-big-data-is-being-used-in-the-fight-against-human-trafficking|access-date = 2015-08-26|first = Tierney|last = Sneed}}</ref>