Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiTree (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Removed vote since my number of WP contributions is insignificant, replaced with comment. |
Belle Fast (talk | contribs) →WikiTree: Reply |
||
Line 109:
'''Comment''' Most of the debate here centers on the quality of Wikitree itself rather on whether it meets the ''admissibility'' criteria. Agree with [[User:KarenJoyce|KarenJoyce]]. [[User:Violette Martin|Violette Martin]] ([[User talk:Violette Martin|talk]]) 13:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
:You are right, Violette. But if the quality of WikiTree's organisation and data is imperfect, shouldn't the Wikipedia article address this?
:It is illuminating to read comments by the admittedly small sample of disappointed users at <nowiki>https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/wikitree.com</nowiki> The site's summary reads: “WikiTree has a rating of 1.87 stars from 15 reviews, indicating that most customers are generally dissatisfied …. WikiTree ranks 54th among genealogy sites.” [[User:Belle Fast|Belle Fast]] ([[User talk:Belle Fast|talk]]) 07:46, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
| |||