Revision as of 19:52, 22 September 2023 edit BilCat (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 214,918 edits →‎Criticisms Section: Comments ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:16, 22 September 2023 edit undo Nbauman (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 12,296 edits →‎Example of bad design: new section Tag: New topic Next edit →
Line 97: Just want to head off any use of [https://web.archive.org/web/20230918135052/https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/18/us/missing-f35-military-jet-charleston.html this article] for financial info on the F-35B. The NYT is normally top-tier, but this reporter has misunderstood the term base year (BY) in [https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Selected_Acquisition_Reports/FY_2019_SARS/20-F-0568_DOC_32_F-35_SAR_Dec_2019_Full.pdf her source] and refers to a cost "as low as $70 million in 2012" which makes no sense. "$72.1M (BY 2012)" in 2023 dollars would be closer to $100 million. [[User:GordonGlottal\|GordonGlottal]] ([[User talk:GordonGlottal\|talk]]) 21:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC) == Example of bad design == Here's a lecture at the Norwegian Developers Conference by a computer user interface designer who uses the F-15 as an example of bad design. The title, "Wouldn't it be cool..." refers to the F-15's replacing mechanical switches with a touch screen, whose buttons fail 20% of the time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGUqyb6mzDw “Wouldn’t it be cool…” and other bad design approaches - Billy Hollis - NDC London 2023 NDC Conferences May 16, 2023 [[User:Nbauman\|Nbauman]] ([[User talk:Nbauman\|talk]]) 21:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II: Difference between revisions