Revision as of 18:28, 14 December 2023 edit Where is Matt? (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 938 edits →‎"Characterizing editors who don't follow WP:DRNC as "revert ninjas who weaponize WP:ONUS" is a fair and legitimate characterization, and I fully stand by it.": If each and every word needs to be justified, so be it. ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:33, 14 December 2023 edit undo Where is Matt? (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 938 edits →‎"Characterizing editors who don't follow WP:DRNC as "revert ninjas who weaponize WP:ONUS" is a fair and legitimate characterization, and I fully stand by it." Next edit →
Line 100: ::Its a long way from not a violation of [[WP:CIVILITY]] to fair and legitimate, a very long way. How do you get there? Note that the vast majority of editors don't follow WP:DRNC, most don't even know that obscure essay exists. You also haven't explained the difference between following ONUS and weaponizing ONUS. [[User:Horse Eye's Back\|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back\|talk]]) 18:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC) :::#behavior that (I consider to be) repugnant can be characterized using derogatory terms :::#Ignorance about the essay ~~does~~is not an excuse for what (I consider to be) bad behavior :::#Using [[WP:ONUS]] to get the upper hand = "weaponization". :::[[User:Where is Matt?\|Where is Matt?]] ([[User talk:Where is Matt?#top\|talk]]) 18:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Where is Matt?