Content deleted Content added
→"Characterizing editors who don't follow WP:DRNC as "revert ninjas who weaponize WP:ONUS" is a fair and legitimate characterization, and I fully stand by it.": If each and every word needs to be justified, so be it. |
|||
Line 100:
::Its a long way from not a violation of [[WP:CIVILITY]] to fair and legitimate, a very long way. How do you get there? Note that the vast majority of editors don't follow WP:DRNC, most don't even know that obscure essay exists. You also haven't explained the difference between following ONUS and weaponizing ONUS. [[User:Horse Eye's Back|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back|talk]]) 18:23, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
:::#behavior that (I consider to be) repugnant can be characterized using derogatory terms
:::#Ignorance about the essay
:::#Using [[WP:ONUS]] to get the upper hand = "weaponization".
:::[[User:Where is Matt?|Where is Matt?]] ([[User talk:Where is Matt?#top|talk]]) 18:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
|