Revision as of 18:38, 14 December 2023 edit Horse Eye's Back (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 47,835 edits →‎"Characterizing editors who don't follow WP:DRNC as "revert ninjas who weaponize WP:ONUS" is a fair and legitimate characterization, and I fully stand by it." ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:42, 14 December 2023 edit undo Where is Matt? (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 938 edits →‎"Characterizing editors who don't follow WP:DRNC as "revert ninjas who weaponize WP:ONUS" is a fair and legitimate characterization, and I fully stand by it." Next edit →
Line 107: ::::#If thats the definition of weaponization then isn't following ONUS weaponizing it as it inherently gives one side the upper hand? ::::[[User:Horse Eye's Back\|Horse Eye's Back]] ([[User talk:Horse Eye's Back\|talk]]) 18:38, 14 December 2023 (UTC) :::::#Are you saying that if I used the term "Ninja type edits", as opposed to "revert ninjas" everything would be cool? :::::#Apparently you're not following my logic. I'm saying that if we re-wrote [[WP:ONUS]], the essay would be followed (even by editors who are not aware of this essay). :::::#Yes. Does that mean we are in agreement that the word "weaponization" is a fair word to use? :::::[[User:Where is Matt?\|Where is Matt?]] ([[User talk:Where is Matt?#top\|talk]]) 18:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Where is Matt?