Revision as of 03:19, 17 February 2024 edit 84.203.151.5 (talk) →‎Merge articles: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:19, 17 February 2024 edit undo 84.203.151.5 (talk) No edit summary Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Next edit →
Line 112: Every other ethno-linguistic group of Europe has it's ancient and modern history written in a single article. There is no reason for an article discussing celts in the past tense to exist, the Celts are a European ethno-linguistic group and we are still here. No body will erase us and modern Celtic culture has become more unified compared to before but that is no reason to claim we are an ancient people who no longer exist. The Balts have one article, the Slavs so why then do you find it justifiable to say "the celts were"? The Celts ARE, and that's final. It's so racist to separate the history our ancestors from us. [[Special:Contributions/84.203.151.5\|84.203.151.5]] ([[User talk:84.203.151.5\|talk]]) 03:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC) ~~== Merge articles ==~~ Every other European ethno-linguistic group has a single article recording their ancient and contemporary history except the Celts who are still being denied their very existence by racists. Calling or referencing any source that claims our group is a modern construct is racist. These two articles should be united and people should learn to stop talking about a race of people in the past tense. Celtic nationalism is a modern concept, OUR EXISTENCE IS NOT. [[Special:Contributions/84.203.151.5\|84.203.151.5]] ([[User talk:84.203.151.5\|talk]]) 03:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Celts (modern): Difference between revisions