Plurality voting: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m c/e
m It's (contraction) > Its (possessive)
Line 387:
 
==== Simplicity and familiarity ====
Plurality voting is generally considered one of the simplest methods and of the most widely known. Because of it'sits widespread use, in situations where people become voters, it will not be a new concept for most and may even be expected. Other systems may specifically need to be explained to the voters and may be perceived as more complicated.
 
Widespread familiarity with the system does not imply widespread familiarity with the effects. Voters may not be aware of the issues in plurality voting, therefore they may vote sincerely even in situations where voting theory would suggest they should vote tactically, thereby voting against their rational interests. {{Citation needed|date=April 2024}}
 
Another counter-argument is that plurality voting is partially considered simple because of it'sits familiarity, which in turn results from its prevalence. Such argument is made by proponents of another plurality-based system, approval voting, where unlike usual plurality voting, voters may vote for any amount of candidates. If approval voting is default, plurality voting (where voters only cast one otherwise fixed amount of votes) would be seen at least equally unfamiliar to voters.
 
==== Ease of balloting ====