ThatDohDude

:::What are you talking about? Yes, sure, this is in English Wikipedia. But when an article is on a foreign; You have to implement the native name of the content in question, both after their English name on the article, which is now done as a note, as you have definitely noticed, AND below their English names on the article's infobox.<br/>You've clearly been on Wikipedia for a while; there's no way you haven't noticed this convention- I mean, take a look at any country, or their leaders' articles? It's all the same.<br/>So uhh.. Why do you seem to always draw the line the second the article in question enters the Turco-Mongol or Turco-Persian sphere; This isn't the first time you've taken problem with a seemingly harmless language add-in.<br/>At least in the context of my Golden Horde-related edits, I noticed that a lot of the rulers' actual name spellings (in Arabic) were seriously getting lost to time. Either there was no known form, or their spellings would be inconsistent across Wikipedia. These rulers **used** Arabic script to write their own names, however, so the spellings weren't actually lost. Going through coin listing sightswebsites, you can see exactly how the rulers would have written their names- not in Persian, Chagatai or Arabic, but in their native Cuman/Kypchak tongue.<br/>Kypchak is NOT a made up language (literally check Wiktionary, the language is documented decently well there, with noticeable differences from Chagatai), nor am I making out the spellings. They're all literally from Golden Horde coin databases straight from the era.<br/>I understand sometimes it can cause clutter, so I'd be down to make these spelling notes; as is the current convention, but in any case, just write me out a reply and tell me what you think.<br/>Golden Horde Coins Database: https://xn----8sbanh2blw.xn--p1ai/articles/litera/silver-coins-khans-golden-horde.html [[User:ThatDohDude|ThatDohDude]] ([[User talk:ThatDohDude#top|talk]]) 15:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)