Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
I think it makes sense to change "the temple" to "a temple" given the footnote's uncertainty on which temple it is. Feel free to revert if you disagree
Slightly reword the lede — The phrase "part of Gnosticism" sounds awkward.
Line 5:
{{Gnosticism}}
{{New Testament Apocrypha}}
The '''Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter''', also known as the '''Coptic Apocalypse of Peter''' and '''Revelation of Peter''', is the third [[Masekhet|tractate]] in [[Codex]] VII of the [[Nag Hammadi library]]. The work is partassociated ofwith [[Gnosticism]], a sect of [[early Christianity]], and is considered part of the [[New Testament apocrypha]] and a work of [[apocalyptic literature]]. It was likely originally written in the [[Koine Greek]] language and composed around 200 CE. The surviving manuscript from Nag Hammadi is a poor-quality translation of the Greek into [[Coptic language|Coptic]], and likely dates from the [[4th century]].
 
The work's author is unknown, although it is purportedly written by the disciple [[Saint Peter|Peter]] ([[pseudepigrapha]]) describing revelations given to him during [[Holy Week]] by the Savior Christ. Jesus tells Peter "through you I have begun a work for the [[Remnant (Bible)|remnant]] whom I called to knowledge (''[[gnosis]]'')"<ref name="meyer71">Gnostic Apocalypse of Peter 71.19-21. Translation is Marvin Meyer's; see {{harvnb|Meyer|2007|pp=488, 491&ndash;492}}.</ref> and reveals secrets of the future. The work criticizes other Christian groups, comparing them to the blind and deaf. Jesus says that false Christians (presumably the [[Proto-orthodox Christianity|proto-orthodox]] movement) will hold power for a time, and that they will be haughty, oppose the truth, set up [[bishop]]s and [[deacon]]s to rule, mislead their followers, and so on. In contrast, certain blessed ones (presumably Gnostics) have immortal souls, and Jesus reassures Peter that they will eventually reign over the others. Peter has a vision of the coming crucifixion, and Christ explains its true meaning in conversation. The text then propounds [[docetism]]: that the divine Christ was invulnerable and never suffered the pains of the mortal world, and certainly did not die during the [[Death of Jesus|apparent crucifixion]]. Rather, only Jesus-the-man suffered in a variant of the [[substitution hypothesis]].