Prisoner of war: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎Middle Ages and Renaissance: Those poor, innocent Muslims, who had a squeaky-clean track record since the year 700. Do try to contain your biases.
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 32:
 
King [[Henry V of England|Henry V]]'s English army killed many French prisoners of war after the [[Battle of Agincourt]] in 1415.<ref>"But when the outcries of the lackies and boies, which ran awaie for feare of the Frenchmen thus spoiling the campe came to the kings eares, he doubting least his enimies should gather togither againe, and begin a new field; and mistrusting further that the prisoners would be an aid to his enimies, or the verie enimies to their takers in deed if they were suffered to live, contrarie to his accustomed gentleness, commended by sound of trumpet, that everie man (upon pain and death) should uncontinentlie slaie his prisoner. When this dolorous decree, and pitifull proclamation was pronounced, pitie it was to see how some Frenchmen were suddenlie sticked with daggers, some were brained with pollaxes, some slaine with malls, others had their throats cut, and some their bellies panched, so that in effect, having respect to the great number, few prisoners were saved." [[Raphael Holinshed]], ''Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland'', quoted by Andrew Gurr in his introduction to {{cite book | last1 = Shakespeare | first1 = William | last2 = Gurr | first2 = Andrew | title = King Henry V | publisher = Cambridge University Press | year = 2005 | page = 24 | isbn = 0-521-84792-3}}</ref> This was done in retaliation for the French killing of the boys and other non-combatants handling the baggage and equipment of the army, and because the French were attacking again and Henry was afraid that they would break through and free the prisoners who would rejoin the fight against the English.
 
In the later [[Middle Ages]] a number of [[religious war]]s aimed to not only defeat but also to eliminate enemies. Authorities in [[Christian Europe]] often considered the extermination of [[Heresy|heretics]] and [[paganism|heathens]] desirable. Examples of such wars include the 13th-century [[Albigensian Crusade]] in [[Languedoc]] and the [[Northern Crusades]] in the [[Baltic region]].<ref>{{cite book |title = Europe: A History |page = [https://archive.org/details/europehistory00davi_0/page/362 362] |author-link = Norman Davies |first = Norman |last = Davies |isbn = 0-19-520912-5 |publisher = Oxford University Press |date = 1996 |url = https://archive.org/details/europehistory00davi_0/page/362}}</ref> When asked by a Crusader how to distinguish between the Catholics and [[Cathars]] following the projected capture (1209) of the city of [[Béziers]], the papal legate [[Arnaud Amalric]] allegedly replied, "[[Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.|Kill them all, God will know His own]]".{{efn|According to the ''Dialogus Miraculorum'' by [[Caesarius of Heisterbach]], Arnaud Amalric was only ''reported'' to have said that.}}
 
Likewise, the inhabitants of conquered cities were frequently massacred during Christians' [[Crusades]] against [[Muslim]]s in the 11th and 12th centuries. [[Noblemen]] could hope to be [[ransom]]ed; their families would have to send to their captors large sums of wealth commensurate with the social status of the captive.
 
[[Feudal Japan]] had no custom of ransoming prisoners of war, who could expect for the most part summary execution.<ref>[http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/journal_of_japanese_studies/v031/31.2lamers.html "Samurai, Warfare and the State in Early Medieval Japan"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304124715/http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=%2Fjournals%2Fjournal_of_japanese_studies%2Fv031%2F31.2lamers.html |date=4 March 2016 }}, ''The Journal of Japanese Studies''.</ref>