Content deleted Content added
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 767:
:::Sigh. It's in your own diff. I really don't have time for this. I've spent too much time on Wikipedia already today. [[User:Elinruby|Elinruby]] ([[User talk:Elinruby#top|talk]]) 21:02, 11 July 2024 (UTC) PS if you don't want to give people the impression you are angry, maybe don't accuse them of stuff, in bold font yet, forsooth, meanwhile (edit conflict) I was trying to say this;
{{tq|OK I see I did cut your comment. I apologize for that as it was not deliberate and apparently there was even more after the ridiculous accusation that I would misrepresent anything anywhere. You accused me of pretty much the worst thing an editor can do, based pretty much on your own confirmation bias, as far as I can tell. I will read the rest of the wild accusations later, and take a good look at what you are trying to say here as well. I have to say that right now it does not feel like a dispassionate administrative suggestion, and I have stuff to do,}} [[User:Elinruby|Elinruby]] ([[User talk:Elinruby#top|talk]]) 21:06, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
 
== Clarification request closed ==
 
The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment/Archive_127#Clarification_request:_Noleander|Noleander clarification request]], in which you may have been involved, has been closed and archived. The request was related to that case's [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Noleander#References to fellow editors|principle 9]], which states:
{{blockquote|Editors are expected to refrain from making unnecessary references to the actual or perceived racial, religious, or ethnic background of fellow editors. Such references should be made only if they clearly serve a legitimate purpose. In the context of a noticeboard discussion or dispute resolution, it will rarely serve a valid purpose to seek to classify the participants in the discussion on this basis.}}
Among the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment/Archive_127#Noleander:_Arbitrator_views_and_discussion|participating Arbitrators]], there was a rough consensus that this principle remains true with current policies and guidelines and that there is not an exemption from this principle for asserting that an editor has a [[WP:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]]. For the Arbitration Committee, [[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]] [[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]] 05:39, 12 July 2024 (UTC)