Content deleted Content added
→Removal of paragraph about Aleister Crowley: add Pasi to the list for completeness; ce for clarity |
|||
Line 173:
:Also, accusing me of "censorship" is just low. Be better. [[Special:Contributions/208.87.236.180|208.87.236.180]] ([[User talk:208.87.236.180|talk]]) 01:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::First, Crowley was not just "an occultist", a glance at the lead paragraph of his article is enough to establish that. Second, Crowley's work was extremely political throughout. Third, he is indeed recognized for the political elements of his work: the recent independent third-party source cited is specifically about the political elements of Crowley's works. As you point out, you've never heard of George, but you're heard of Crowley. The fact that Crowley is indeed well-known and that there are independent third-party sources argue for his inclusion.
::The work cited is not the only source that treats of politics in Crowley's works. These several works focus his politic theories. There are
::*Bolton, K. R., Crowley, A., Johnson, G. R. (2010). ''Aleister Crowley As Political Theorist''. New Zealand: Renaissance Press.
::*Lingan, E. B. (2016). A Disturbing Mix of Religion and Politics: Aleister Crowley’s The Savior. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, 38(3), 90–93. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26386811
::* Nilsson, J. (2023). “If the Kingdom be Ruled According to the Tao”: Politics as “Eastern Wisdom” in Aleister Crowley’s Reception of the Daodejing. Numen, 71(1), 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685276-20231716
::* {{cite book |last=Pasi |first=Marco |title=Aleister Crowley and the Temptation of Politics |publisher=Routledge |year=2014}}
::Now that you have been informed that multiple works specifically discuss politics in Crowley's works, the title of one even calling him a political theorist, I hope you will desist. [[User:Skyerise|Skyerise]] ([[User talk:Skyerise|talk]]) 08:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||