Content deleted Content added
→Please stop: add; diff |
→Please stop: Reply |
||
Line 15:
::And sorry I really find your post [[WP:TLDR|too long]]. If every editor who misunderstand policies keep following me, reverting my edits, asking me to read their long posts, and even making untrue claims about me, and asking me to respond, (likely because of [[WP:WIN]], although you already WIN at the suicide articles but still seem unsatisfied), it’s just a time sink and I find it really harassing and it’s tiring for me to satisfy such needs. Again, that’s enough. --[[User:Dustfreeworld|<span style="color: navy">'''Dustfreeworld'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Dustfreeworld|talk]]) 01:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
::Just to help you understand, PRESERVE doesn’t mean you can’t disagree with an edit, but what you should do is discuss on talk page first, '''instead of reverting outright'''. Besides the war article, your reverts at the suicide articles and [[David Pui]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Pui&diff=prev&oldid=1241192503] are obvious violations of PRESERVE. I believe I’m gentle enough not adding the warning templates here, but just adding a link to them in my comment above. But not only that you didn't strike out your untrue claims. You are not self-reverting your problematic/ policy-violating edits. You are following me around and are keeping on with the same problematic behaviour. All these are really exhausting my patience. --[[User:Dustfreeworld|<span style="color: navy">'''Dustfreeworld'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Dustfreeworld|talk]]) 01:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Dustfreeworld|Dustfreeworld]] It's funny how ''you'' tell me that I {{green|should do is discuss on talk page first}} when you are the one that tells everyone that BRD is optional. I'll say it once more - '''PRESERVE is not your one-way ticket to ensuring that everything you add onto this site will remain how you want it.''' I didn't "win" anything - you have the full ability to re-add the crisis hotline image but you have chosen not to. Multiple editors have shown that they disagree with the link additions, yet you insist on keeping them. Is this what you call consensus? Or will you keep fighting and saying that '''only''' ''your'' editorial judgement and consensus is correct? Even though multiple editors disagree with your addition of the links (which once again, isn't content), are you trying to "WP:WIN" by keeping those links on there at all costs? <span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <span style="font-weight:bold">[[User:Karnataka|<span style="color:black; font-style:italic">Karnataka</span>]]</span></span> 15:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
== Question from [[User:Diegomelendez.co|Diegomelendez.co]] (17:15, 16 August 2024) ==
| |||