Content deleted Content added
→‎Licensing: new section
Gbleem (talk | contribs)
Line 332:
 
Hello - if you have a problem with multi-licensing in addition to GFDL by default, the best place to take it is the discussion page here: [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing]]. Going after the Galbijim Wiki is not going to do much good since we have the same agreement as the one here: GFDL by default, CC or public domain if the editor states so on his/her talk page. [[User:Mithridates|Mithridates]] ([[User talk:Mithridates|talk]]) 17:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
:I don't have a problem with multi-licensing. The issue is that the Galbijim policy is not stated clearly on the website. For example the editing window in Wikipedia says "You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL." Because Galbijim does not have this then any contributer could claim that they never agreed to placing their contribution under the GFDL. Therefore, contributions to Galbijim are not under the GFDL. --[[User:Gbleem|Gbleem]] ([[User talk:Gbleem#top|talk]]) 10:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)