Content deleted Content added
Rinconsoleao (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 254:
:By 'grandiloquent', he probably meant your tendency to use uncommon, sophisticated language. And since his criticism related to the inaccessible style of the article, it is perfectly on point. Perhaps he could have found a gentler way of stating it, but I don't see a personal attack there. I see commentary on your style of writing. --[[User:Rinconsoleao|Rinconsoleao]] ([[User talk:Rinconsoleao#top|talk]]) 07:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
::That's hardly the meaning of “grandiloquent”, and it's hardly plausible that he would misuse the word in such a manner given the expression in which it participates. Again, it's a plain violation of [[WP:NPA]], and its restoration is likewise a violation of [[WP:NPA]]. If you want to counsel the editor on how to express his points without personal attack, feel free. Again, I would welcome the opportunity to show that the remainder of the criticism doesn't hold water. But restoring the original comments placed you in violation of [[WP:NPA]]. —[[User:SlamDiego|SlamDiego]]<sub><font size="-2">[[User_talk:SlamDiego|←T]]</font></sub> 07:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||