Content deleted Content added
Rinconsoleao (talk | contribs) |
Rinconsoleao (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 266:
::Perhaps you should review [[WP:NPA]]; there is no violation of it in noting that the explanation to your restoring a personal attack was either in having made a sloppy reading of it or in willfully restoring an attack, nor was there a violation of [[WP:NPA]] in chosing to [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] and thus assume that the reading was sloppy.
::You might also review [[WP:IDONTHEARTHAT]]. No objective editor would have difficulty in seeing the personal attack in such expressions as “your characteristically grandiloquent, yet inaccurate and unfocused ad hominem attack”, and you're unlikely to get a sympathetic treatment by refusal to acknowledge that if this moves to a complaint against you. (It is on the cusp of doing so.) —[[User:SlamDiego|SlamDiego]]<sub><font size="-2">[[User_talk:SlamDiego|←T]]</font></sub> 08:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
:::I fail to understand why you believe the editor who referred to your response as 'grandiloquent' was making a personal attack. I agree that your characterization of my reading as 'sloppy' was not a personal attack either. Both seem to me reasonable attempts to describe the other's editing behavior in order to get closer to a decision about how and whether (or not) to change the article.
:::Since you have not been convinced by my argument that the sentence with the word 'grandiloquent' was not offensive, would you object to my restoring all the comments except that sentence? --[[User:Rinconsoleao|Rinconsoleao]] ([[User talk:Rinconsoleao#top|talk]]) 08:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||