Revision as of 02:50, 1 March 2010 edit Amaury (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 98,005 edits m Reverted edits by 75.70.139.161 to last revision by 98.117.34.180 (HG) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:54, 10 May 2010 edit undo 67.64.156.1 (talk) →‎Image Next edit →
Line 22: A more anatomic photo would be better suited to the nature of wikipedia, but this unexpected image did have me laughing out loud. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/60.240.36.216\|60.240.36.216]] ([[User talk:60.240.36.216\|talk]]) 13:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> I don't think a totally shaven or waxed mons pubis is appropriate or encyclopedic. Surely an adult mons pubis should be shown in it's unaltered state. ==Pioneer plaque==

Talk:Mons pubis: Difference between revisions