Talk:Actor model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 125:
::I made a relatively minimal edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Actor_model&diff=575150611&oldid=574306264]. (1) I removed the robust11.org reference, which has no publication info apart from appearing on a website for which the WHOIS information is very relevant. (2) I removed a reference to a "Middle History" paper which, according to its Arxiv page, was submitted in 2009 but has no publication info, and I was unable to find publication info anywhere else. (3) I combined two references to the "A Computable Universe" paper, so that they share the same reference details, but I removed a link from it to a webpage. This reference does appear to be published by World Scientific. The remaining reference info for it is still sufficient to verify printed the reference.
 
:::As something of a logician, you may not be aware that the action in Computer Science is in the refereed conferences (i.g. [http://robust11.org Inconsistency Robustness 2011]). Also, [http://arxiv.org arXiv] is becoming an increasingly important publisher. Other areas of Wikipedia have recognized this reality. Why not here? [[Special:Contributions/171.65.249.4|171.65.249.4]] ([[User talk:171.65.249.4|talk]]) 20:38, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 
::In particular, these edits are based solely on the lack of publication info, and if such info was available I would reinstate the references. I invite you to continue editing the article, if you are knowledgeable, to make sure that the remaining references are accurate in terms of the content of the referenced article, which I have not had the opportunity to verify myself at this point. &mdash;&nbsp;Carl <small>([[User:CBM|CBM]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:CBM|talk]])</small> 21:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)