Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Dutch Revolt/Archive 2) (bot |
Marcocapelle (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 96:
::::For the moment I don't know what to do with external links to other wikipedias. I don't want to mess up the existing links to the Dutch Revolt article. In any case, I think the articles could be made complementary and there could be an amicable division.--[[User:Ereunetes|Ereunetes]] ([[User talk:Ereunetes|talk]]) 21:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
::::The question is really, would you write historical articles primarily split by ''aspects'' (like this proposal suggests splitting off the military aspect) or would you write historical articles primarily split by natural ''time periods'' (e.g. up to Union of Utrecht, from Union of Utrecht to Twelve Years' Truce) while covering all aspects within each time period. My personal feeling, for what it's worth, is that readers like the latter much better. [[User:Marcocapelle|Marcocapelle]] ([[User talk:Marcocapelle|talk]]) 13:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
== Bulut Book ==
| |||