Revision as of 21:42, 10 July 2016 edit FourViolas (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 7,749 edits →‎Removal of "one of the most prestigious": edit conflict: some policies and ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:44, 10 July 2016 edit undo First Lord of Downing Street (talk \| contribs) 410 edits →‎Removal of "one of the most prestigious" Next edit →
Line 271: :::Do not fuck with others' posts again, as you did here [https://en.wikipedia.org/?diff=729216369&oldid=729215683] (now corrected by me), ''ever''. '''[[User:EEng#s\|<font color="red">E</font>]][[User talk:EEng#s\|<font color="blue">Eng</font>]]''' 20:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC) ::::{{ec}}Slightly more politely: there's no question of "[[WP:SYNTH]]esizing from rankings" here, because as the quotes in the refs show, this language is directly supported without OR from multiple high-quality sources. Reviewing past discussions is advisable, to avoid having to rehash old discussions when policy-based consensus was reached (or to see which policies, if any, have been seriously overlooked). And we have [[WP:TPON\|a guideline instructing editors not to change others' talk page comments except in a few specific cases]]. [[User:FourViolas\|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas\|talk]]) 21:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC) ::::: ~~Both~~Some ~~of you~~editors need to calm down. I made the first revert on the article with the same reasoning as presented above. I agree that Harvard is prestigious and I am more thank okay with including the entice in the "ranking and reputation" section; its inclusion as the first sentence just seems ridiculous. There is a reason this article has been failed as a Good Article twice. I think we all know why. (Hint: take a look at [[Dartmouth College]], and [[Columbia University]].) '''♔[[User:First Lord of Downing Street#s\|<font color="#002147">First Lord of Downing Street</font>]]♔''' 21:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Harvard University: Difference between revisions