Content deleted Content added
→Role of previous convictions in sentencing proceedings: layout; use {{quote}} template |
KolbertBot (talk | contribs) m Bot: HTTP→HTTPS (v485) |
||
Line 20:
The '''Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974''' (c.53) of the [[UK Parliament]] enables some [[Criminal law|criminal]] [[conviction (law)|conviction]]s to be ignored after a [[rehabilitation (penology)|rehabilitation]] period.<ref>{{Cite web|url = https://www.nacro.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/rehabilitation-of-offenders-act-1974-guide.pdf|title = NACRO Changing Lives, Reducing Crime|date = 2015-12-12|accessdate = 2015-12-12|website = Nacro|publisher = NACRO|last = Smith|first = William}}</ref> Its purpose is that people do not have a lifelong blot on their records because of a relatively minor offence in their past. The rehabilitation period is automatically determined by the sentence. After this period, if there has been no further conviction the conviction is "spent" and, with certain exceptions, need not be disclosed by the ex-offender in any context such as when applying for a job, obtaining [[insurance]], or in [[Civil law (common law)|civil]] proceedings. A conviction for the purposes of the ROA includes a conviction issued outside Great Britain (see s1(4) of the 1974 Act) and therefore foreign convictions are eligible to receive the protection of the ROA.<ref name="hub.unlock.org.uk">http://hub.unlock.org.uk/knowledgebase/rehabilitation-offenders-act-1974-2/</ref>
Under the [[Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012]] (section 139), the Act as it applies in England and Wales was updated to provide new rehabilitation periods – with most convictions becoming spent in a shorter amount of time.<ref>{{Cite web|title = Hundreds of thousands of criminals to get clean slate in law change|url =
A conviction that is spent under British law may not be so considered elsewhere. For example, criminal convictions must be disclosed when applying to enter the [[United States]]; spent convictions are not excluded for US immigration purposes under US law.
Line 54:
* by the [[Financial Conduct Authority]], [[Prudential Regulation Authority (United Kingdom)|Prudential Regulation Authority]] and certain other bodies involved in finance, when asked to assess the suitability of a person to hold a particular status in the financial and monetary sectors.
* to assess a person’s suitability to adopt children, or a particular child, or a question about anyone over the age of 18 living with such a person.
However, it should be noted that disclosure of a criminal conviction where necessary, i.e. not covered by the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, or after the 2014 change, which introduced protected convictions, does not automatically bar a particular individual from employment in a given profession. For instance, notable cases include Khalid Missouri, a former robber turned successful and respected solicitor;<ref>{{Cite web|title = Becoming a solicitor - Information Hub by Unlock - Online self-help information for people with convictionsInformation Hub by Unlock – Online self-help information for people with convictions|url = http://hub.unlock.org.uk/knowledgebase/becoming-a-solicitor/|website = hub.unlock.org.uk|accessdate = 2015-11-14}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title = Robber allowed to qualify as a solicitor in the same court that jailed him|url = http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2290940/Robber-allowed-qualify-solicitor-court-jailed-him.html|website = Mail Online|accessdate = 2015-11-14}}</ref> Gary Bell, a former fraudster turned high-profile successful barrister and Queen's Counsel;<ref>{{Cite web|title = Gary was a fraudster. Now he's a barrister with a TV show|url =
===ROA where profession or employment is not subject to the exceptions or exemptions===
|