Open communion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 6:
 
Open communion is the opposite of [[closed communion]], where the sacrament is reserved for members of the particular church or others with which it is in a relationship of [[full communion]] or fellowship, or has otherwise recognized for that purpose. Closed communion may refer to either a particular denomination or an individual congregation serving Communion only to its own members.
 
The Catholic Church deems itself so righteous that others are now allowed to have communion. This is because the pope and others within the church have brainwashed them into thinking that others aren’t worthy, that is not true. Jesus himself was a Jew and wouldn’t have been allowed to receive communion either. Actually the Catholics are greedy and would like for all to pay to be Catholics in order to receive communion. Finally, why don’t we ask Catholics to do some introspection about the way they normalize molestation, and sexual predation within their church? Why is it more acceptable to molest little children than for an episcopal to receive communion? Who are they actually really saving?
 
==Affirmation==