Ealdgyth

Joined 27 May 2007

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Borsoka (talk | contribs) at 03:36, 24 June 2024 (→‎FAR: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 29 days ago by Borsoka in topic FAR

FACs needing feedback
viewedit
Ethics Review it now
Susanna Hoffs Review it now
Aston Martin Vanquish (2012) Review it now
Jozo Tomasevich Review it now


Featured article removal candidates
PowerBook 100 Review now
1981 Irish hunger strike Review now
Battle of Red Cliffs Review now
Mariah Carey Review now
Pokémon Channel Review now
Concerto delle donne Review now
The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask Review now
Geography of Ireland Review now



WikiCup 2022 September newsletter

Signups open for The Core Contest

The Core Contest—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—will take place this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is £300 of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". Signups are open now. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24.

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

WikiCup 2023 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with anyone scoring less than 673 points being eliminated. It was a high scoring round with all but one of the contestants who progressed to the final having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

  •   Epicgenius, with 2173 points topping the scores, gained mainly from a featured article, 38 good articles and 9 DYKs. He was followed by
  •   Sammi Brie, with 1575 points, gained mainly from a featured article, 28 good articles and 50 good article reviews. Close behind was
  •   Thebiguglyalien, with 1535 points mainly gained from a featured article, 15 good articles, 26 good article reviews and lots of bonus points.

Between them during round 4, contestants achieved 12 featured articles, 3 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 126 good articles, 46 DYK entries, 14 ITN entries, 67 featured article candidate reviews and 147 good article reviews. Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them and within 24 hours of the end of the final. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

I will be standing down as a judge after the end of the contest. I think the Cup encourages productive editors to improve their contributions to Wikipedia and I hope that someone else will step up to take over the running of the Cup. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), and Cwmhiraeth (talk)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Ealdgyth! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:46, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).

  Administrator changes

  Graham Beards
 

  Bureaucrat changes

 
 

  Oversight changes

  Dreamy Jazz

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
454   Wand (talk) Add sources
153   Oda Nobutada (talk) Add sources
640   Azuchi–Momoyama period (talk) Add sources
85   Sanada Masayuki (talk) Add sources
131   Tirunelveli district (talk) Add sources
647   French Wars of Religion (talk) Add sources
68   People of the Sengoku period in popular culture (talk) Cleanup
812   Honnō-ji Incident (talk) Cleanup
427   Battle of Khanwa (talk) Cleanup
4   1565 in Sweden (talk) Expand
31   Gunshi Kanbei (talk) Expand
16   Military history of Norway (talk) Expand
348   Udai Singh II (talk) Unencyclopaedic
5,099   Shōgun (novel) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
9   Naitō Nobunari (talk) Unencyclopaedic
6   Beglerbegi (talk) Merge
231   Monster Hunter World: Iceborne (talk) Merge
94   2024 Iranian missile strikes in Pakistan (talk) Merge
26   Siege of Groenlo (1627) (talk) Wikify
14   Remigius de Fécamp (talk) Wikify
196   Lanyard (talk) Wikify
9   Campaign of Tahmasp I (1552) (talk) Orphan
2   Sabaji Koli (talk) Orphan
3   CALLUP net (talk) Orphan
31   Sassa Narimasa (talk) Stub
4   Argideen River (talk) Stub
11   Myōki (talk) Stub
12   Milan police headquarters bombing (talk) Stub
51   Hōjō Ujinao (talk) Stub
14   Hōjō Ujiteru (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

FAR

I have nominated Middle Ages for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Borsoka (talk) 03:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply