Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. T. Eberhard (2nd nomination)
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:26, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- J._T._Eberhard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a WP:BLP of a student who is known for organizing a conference while in college (Skepticon) and for being an outspoken atheist blogger. There are very few secondary sources for his work on Skepticon despite 2011 being its 4th year. I have searched for other news articles about this subject but outside of his personal blog there is very little content available. I'm not sure what is best at this point - redirecting to Skepticon or deleting entirely. Allecher (talk) 01:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I applaud what he is described as having done, but per the article he does not appear to satisfy WP:BIO. Edison (talk) 02:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This page has had a lot of time to be corrected, with little improvement. If the sources needed existed, I'm sure they would have already been added by now. I won't argue with redirecting if that is what is agreed on in the end. Sgerbic (talk) 03:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.