Talk:2007 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Explained Finals

edit

I felt it was important to note not just results of the finals, but significant details that affected the competition. This is a practice that needs to be observed when posting results of major gymnastics competitions. If a gymnast is injured or scratches, the results of the entire competition will be changed. Posting results verbatium is a misleading representative of what actually happened.

Also, it's important to distinguish that only eight teams performed at finals and the other teams scores were from previous days. --69.136.10.51 19:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2007 World Artistic Gymnastics Championships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Reply