This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kanada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have long thought this article didn't make a lot of sense on Wikipedia, it is a very long, in depth article on an organisation that does not even have an article itself. I would be fine with this forming part of an article on the Institute, but I think otherwise it is frankly, rather weird to have an entire article on one little ad controversy if we don't think we should have an article on the organisation itself. What does everyone think though? Threadnecromancer (talk) 04:39, 22 October 2015 (UTC)ThreadnecromancerReply