Talk:William Hodgson (RAF officer)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Djmaschek in topic GA Review
William Hodgson (RAF officer) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 26, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:William Hodgson (RAF officer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 05:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Initial comment
editI plan to review this article. Djmaschek (talk) 05:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Review 1
edit@Zawed: Sorry, I got distracted for a few days. Normally, I find numerous errors, but your grammar and syntax are excellent. There is only one issue to fix for GA class. Djmaschek (talk) 19:15, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- In the London Gazette quote, it reads, "and damaged a Heinkel in." Shouldn't this read, "and damaged a Heinkel 111"? If this typo was in the original article, you might want to add "[sic]". Otherwise, please fix.
- Thanks, Djmaschek. Yes, the "in" was a typo (possibly an OCR issue) in the html version of the citation that I cut and pasted. It should be 111, and I have now fixed. Thanks again, Zawed (talk) 21:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- GA class. Djmaschek (talk) 21:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)