- Ali Khedery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough. Minor foreign adviser whose name was mentioned among thousands others in WikiLeaks.--Kathovo talk 13:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Photo caption: "Ali Khedery standing behind George W Bush, with Nouri al Malaki"... op-ed piece in the NY Times... and WashPo too... significant mentions in multiple books... clearly had a lot of power. Wikileaks was a small part of his notability. Article in Foreign Policy... --Elvey(t•c) 21:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Standing behind Bush in a photograph is not a criterion for notability.
- He clearly fails WP:AUTHOR, co-eding aryicles is obviously not a valid reason to establish notability as a notable author. He also fails WP:POLITICIAN for that matter.
- Mention 1st is a brief description in one sentence among a long list of minor advisers, 2nd is somewhat a lengthy personal description, author also describes many others, hundreds of names are found in the index. 3rd Khedery is acknowledged for proofreading parts of the book.
- Wikileaks are basically email correspondences, you can find tens of thousands of names in database, nothing special here.--Kathovo talk 06:48, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GNG, numerous reliable news sources demonstrate notability. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 01:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see that he receives significant media coverage.--Kathovo talk 10:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- That's because you have to make a small effort, like checking Google News. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 11:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- No this is not media coverage of him. He is a media commentator, his articles and their mirrors results in X hits when googling his name. You will find also thousands of commentators[1][2] and journalists [3][4] whose name also appear quite often in news search results, this is simply no criteria for an entry in Wikipedia unless they accomplished something of note.--Kathovo talk 11:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- That's because you have to make a small effort, like checking Google News. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 11:08, 3 April 2015 (UTC)