This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Toxic (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Toxic (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
Toxic (song) is part of the In the Zone series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
#1 On U.S. Billboard Hot 100?
In 'The Single's Collection' CD the cover page with all of the tracks and their composers and producers (I don't know the proper name for this) it says 'Toxic' was #1 on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100 for 4 weeks. So, what do you think...? #1 or #9?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by InTheZon (talk • contribs) 02:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- It was number one in Pop Songs for four weeks. A printing mistake. Xwomanizerx (talk) 02:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
144 BPM?
I tested that on Logic Pro 9 and it's actually 143 BPM. Not that it's that big of a deal. Just thought I'd say that it's 143 BPM on my music software. --Rainbowroad6w (talk) 18:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's listed as 144 on the source. Xwomanizerx (talk) 18:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Well, ok. It's 143 on Logic Pro 9, though. But ok. It's a small difference. --Rainbowroad6w (talk) 23:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)