Talk:Toxic (song)

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thevampireashlee (talk | contribs) at 04:53, 19 May 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rainbowroad6w in topic 144 BPM?
Good articleToxic (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starToxic (song) is part of the In the Zone series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 14, 2010Good article nomineeListed
April 27, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
August 10, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

#1 On U.S. Billboard Hot 100?

In 'The Single's Collection' CD the cover page with all of the tracks and their composers and producers (I don't know the proper name for this) it says 'Toxic' was #1 on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100 for 4 weeks. So, what do you think...? #1 or #9?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by InTheZon (talkcontribs) 02:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

It was number one in Pop Songs for four weeks. A printing mistake. Xwomanizerx (talk) 02:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

144 BPM?

I tested that on Logic Pro 9 and it's actually 143 BPM. Not that it's that big of a deal. Just thought I'd say that it's 143 BPM on my music software. --Rainbowroad6w (talk) 18:41, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

It's listed as 144 on the source. Xwomanizerx (talk) 18:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Antwort
Well, ok. It's 143 on Logic Pro 9, though. But ok. It's a small difference. --Rainbowroad6w (talk) 23:17, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply