Talk:AMIA bombing
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 18, 2012. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Inside Job
editThis article presents the carbomb theory as a fact, when it is in fact only a theory put forth by corrupt intelligence services and the corrupt judiciary of my country. Things like the absence of the two policemen that were meant to be close to the building, the unclear practices of the security apparatus when it came to the production of "evidence" (the van's motor). The article in its current state only obliquely points toward the unreliability of the narrative in sections liek the one on Berro, but the main part of the article deceptively states as fact things that are dubious at best 2803:9800:9504:7B33:4B6C:CC1A:D8EF:BD67 (talk) 01:58, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 August 2022
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= oder |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace dead hyperlink in reference 18
Change: http://www.worldpolicy.org/what-nisman-said-about-iran[1]
To: http://www.rhesq.com/What_Nisman_Said_About_Iran.pdf[2] 206209nyc (talk) 18:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ Richard Horowitz. "What Nisman Said About Iran – World Policy Institute". World Policy. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
- ^ Richard Horowitz. "What Nisman Said About Iran – World Policy Institute" (PDF). World Policy. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 April 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= oder |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The article is outdated, please update it.
In April 2024, 30 years after the attack, the Argentine justice finally confirmed that the government of Iran was the mastermind behind the attack and ordered its execution. The Criminal Cassation Chamber established that Iran orchestrated the massacre and classified it as a crime against humanity. The judges of the second instance, Carlos Mahiques, Diego Barroetaveña, and Ángela Ledesma, ruled that the attack was part of Iran's political and strategic design and was executed by the terrorist organization Hezbollah.
Sources:
- Argentine Court Says Iran Was Behind Israeli Embassy and Jewish Center Attacks
- Argentine high court rules Iran behind AMIA bombing, calls it ‘crime against humanity’
- AMIA bombing: Argentina court holds 'terrorist state' Iran, Hezbollah responsible
- Argentina court blames Iran for deadly 1994 bombing of Jewish center
- "Atentado a la AMIA: de Javier Milei a la oposición, la reacción tras el fallo que culpó a Irán". LA NACION (in Spanish). 2024-04-12. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
- Centenera, Mar (2024-04-12). "La justicia argentina declara "crimen de lesa humanidad" el atentado contra la mutual judía AMIA". El País Argentina (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-04-12.
- >Press, Por DÉBORA REY y ALMUDENA CALATRAVA Associated (2024-04-12). "Milei y la comunidad judía argentina celebran el fallo que señala a Irán por el ataque a la AMIA". Los Angeles Times en Español (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-04-12.
In 2023, on appeal, the Federal Chamber of Cassation revoked the dismissal that Cristina Fernández de Kirchner had benefited from and ordered her to be tried for the alleged cover-up for which Alberto Nisman accused her regarding the Argentina-Iran Memorandum of Understanding. The relatives of the victims of the AMIA attack had demanded that the oral trial against the former president be held.The reasons are that "the accused persons are attributed to the organization of a complex criminal plan to achieve or favor the impunity of the Iranian citizens suspected of having participated in the terrorist attack on the AMIA headquarters through two parallel channels, one formal - with the signing of the memorandum of understanding - and another informal, with unofficial negotiations."
Sources:
- "AMIA | Argentina confirma responsabilidad de Irán en el caso de la mutual judía: ¿por qué no ha ido a juicio el peor atentado en la historia del país?". BBC News Mundo (in Spanish). 2024-04-12. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
- Criales, José Pablo (2023-09-19). "La justicia argentina reabre dos causas contra Cristina Kirchner y la envía a juicio oral". El País Argentina (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-04-12.
- "Memorándum con Irán: Cristina Kirchner también irá a juicio por el encubrimiento del ataque a la AMIA". infobae (in European Spanish). 2023-09-18. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
- Salinas, Lucía (2024-04-12). "Los efectos de un fallo histórico por la AMIA: la Corte tiene en sus manos la última carta de Cristina para evitar el juicio por el Pacto con Irán". Clarín (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-04-12.
Jalu (talk) 23:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Erledigt The second part. The first part was already done by others. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Interpol
editCall to Arrest the irainan minister
https://www.kan.org.il/content/kan-news/global/741616/ 2A0D:6FC0:B6D:E300:C42E:D898:45E:B42E (talk) 07:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)