Revision as of 13:15, 21 February 2016 edit Dan Polansky (talk \| contribs) Autopatrollers, Patrollers, Template editors 141,951 edits →‎Decision ← Go to previous edit		Revision as of 18:45, 21 February 2016 edit undo I'm so meta even this acronym (talk \| contribs) 23,919 edits →‎Support Go to next edit →
Line 41: # {{support}} [[User:Xbony2\|-Xbony2]] ([[User talk:Xbony2\|talk]]) 19:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC) # {{support}} --[[User:Vahagn Petrosyan\|Vahag]] ([[User talk:Vahagn Petrosyan\|talk]]) 21:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC) # {{support\|<u>I</u> support <u>the addition of the first two sentences but I oppose the addition of the third sentence.</u>}}, <s>although</s> [[User:Dan Polansky\|Dan Polansky]] is right in objecting to the use of the word "best"; proper modesty would require justifying these rules by appeal to the value of consistency, not to the optimality of the format they enforce. — [[User:I'm so meta even this acronym#NO BOLD\|I.S.]][[User talk:I'm so meta even this acronym#NO BOLD\|M.E.T.A.]] 00:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC) <small>— Post edited (underscored elements added, stricken element removed). — [[User:I'm so meta even this acronym#NO BOLD\|I.S.]][[User talk:I'm so meta even this acronym#NO BOLD\|M.E.T.A.]] 18:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)</small> #: @[[User:I'm so meta even this acronym]]: So what makes you support? The addition has no practical policy impact, which makes it dispensable, and is misleading. It does not even codify existing practice. --[[User:Dan Polansky\|Dan Polansky]] ([[User talk:Dan Polansky\|talk]]) 11:09, 20 February 2016 (UTC) #:: {{reply to\|Dan Polansky}} I agree with Rationale point 1 ("Quickly states [w]hat [[WT:EL]] is and what it does, for those unacquainted with the policy."); preambles like this are a good idea, IMO. — [[User:I'm so meta even this acronym#NO BOLD\|I.S.]][[User talk:I'm so meta even this acronym#NO BOLD\|M.E.T.A.]] 12:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2015-12/EL introduction: difference between revisions